[1]杜园园,李祖佩.项目进村背景下的村庄权力结构再造[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(06):34-41.
　DU Yuanyuan,LI Zupei.Reconstructing Village Power Structure under Village Project Background[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(06):34-41.
点击复制

项目进村背景下的村庄权力结构再造()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
15
期数:
2015年06期
页码:
34-41
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2015-11-26

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reconstructing Village Power Structure under Village Project Background
作者:
杜园园1;  李祖佩2
1. 中山大学 哲学系/华南农村研究中心 广东 广州 510275;
2. 华中农业大学 社会学系, 湖北 武汉 430074
Author(s):
DU Yuanyuan1;  LI Zupei2
关键词:
项目进村; 村庄权力再造; 私人治理; 去公共性
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
项目下乡背景下,为吸引项目进村,村庄以提高项目承载力为核心进行了各种努力.通过对广西A村的调查发现,村庄为加强干部团结,提供治理能力,对村庄权力结构进行了两级再造,即将经济精英吸纳为村委干部,将灰黑势力发展为村民小组长,并将其改造成一种依附关系.权力的两级构造带来了治理资源和手段的两级分化.村庄治理呈现依靠传统治理资源进行试探性治理,依靠私人资源进行应急性治理,依靠象征暴力资源进行常规治理的治理秩序.然而,这种治理模式过度依赖私人资源,造成村庄治理去公共性的严重后果.项目越推进,村民越对村庄政治生活绝望.村级权力出现合法性危机.笔者认为,村级治理权力结构的再造,应嵌入到村庄自身的社会网络中.将多数普通村民组织起来参与村庄治理,才是提高村庄项目承载力的合理之道.
Abstract:
Under the background of village project,villages are making every effort to upgrade the capacity of accepting and upholding the project in order to attract more projects to enter the villages. Our survey found that for the purpose of enhancing the village leadership unity and its capacity of governance, the village power structure had been reshaped into two levels, i.e. Economic elites were recruited as village leaders and local black and evil forces were enlisted as group leaders of villagers, and transformed as a subordinate relationship. The two level structure of power caused the polarization of governance resources and vehicles. The village governance was conducted in a form of trial and probing administration with reliance on traditional governance resources, emergency administration with resorting to individual violence, and regular administration with reliance on symbolic violence resources. However, this kind of village governance over-depended on private resources, causing the loss of public administration in the village governance. The more the project was promoted, the more hopeless the villagers feel about the village political life—a legitimate crisis of village powers. The author believed that the recreation of village governance power should be inserted in the social web of the village itself. The mobilization and organization of ordinary villagers into the village governance is the most rational and ultimate way to improve the project accepting and upholding capacity.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周飞舟.财政资金的专项化及其问题 兼论"项目治国"[J].社会,2012(1):1-37.
[2] 申端峰.村庄权力研究:回顾与前瞻[J].中国农村观察,2006(5):51-58.
[3] 曹海林.乡村权力机构的演变与新农村建设的再组织化[J].社会科学,2008(3):77-84.
[4] 金太军.村庄治理中三重权力互动的政治社会学分析[J].战略与管理,2002(2):105-114.
[5] 李祖佩.项目进村和乡村治理重构——一项基于村庄本位的考察[J].中国农村观察,2013(4):2-13.
[6] 仝志辉,贺雪峰.村庄权力结构的三层分析——兼论选举后村级权力的合法性[J].中国社会科学,2002(1):159-167.
[7] 谢小芹,简小鹰.从"内向型治理"到"外向型治理":资源变迁背景下的村庄治理[J].广东社会科学,2014(3):208-218.
[8] 折晓叶,陈婴婴.项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑[J].中国社会科学,2012(4):126-223.
[9] 陈锋.从连带式制衡反思农民非正式治理实践[N].中国社会科学报,2012-09-14(B02).
[10] 曾红萍.去公共性化的乡村治理及其后果——以利益密集型村庄为例[J].学习与实践,2013(2):87-92.
[11] 李祖佩."资源消解自治"——项目下乡背景下的村治困境及其逻辑[J].学习与实践,2012(11):82-87.

相似文献/References:

[1]马良灿.组织治理抑或村庄治理——系统论视域下项目进村研究的学术理路及其拓展[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(03):37.
　MA Liangcan.Organizational Governance or Rural Governance? Academic Theories and Theoretical Expansion of the Study on Projects Entering the Village Under the System Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):37.
[2]梁琦.“新经营村庄”：乡村振兴背景下村庄项目经营的治理逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(02):33.
　LIANG Qi.“New Village Management”: The Governance Logic of Village Project Management under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(06):33.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-2-4;改回日期:。
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2662014BQ072)
作者简介:杜园园,女,中山大学哲学系博士生,研究方向为农村社会学.E-mail:pingxiang.dyy@163.com;李祖佩,男,华中农业大学社会学系讲师,博士,研究方向为政治社会学,农村社会学.
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01