[1]田雄,王伯承.单边委托与模糊治理:基于乡村社会的混合关系研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(02):64-73.
　TIAN Xiong,WANG Bocheng.Unilateral Delegation and Ambiguity Governing Mentality:Research on Hybrid Relationships Based on Rural Society[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(02):64-73.
点击复制

单边委托与模糊治理:基于乡村社会的混合关系研究()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
16
期数:
2016年02期
页码:
64-73
栏目:
转型与乡村治理中的政府行为
出版日期:
2016-03-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Unilateral Delegation and Ambiguity Governing Mentality:Research on Hybrid Relationships Based on Rural Society
作者:
田雄;  王伯承
Author(s):
TIAN Xiong;  WANG Bocheng
关键词:
混合关系; 利益主体; 村民自治; 单边委托; 模糊治理
分类号:
D523.5
摘要:
当前,乡村社会利益主体之间关系呈现出复杂多变而非理性合作的态势。其中,县乡干部与村干部形成"共事与共谋"关系,村干部与村民形成"支持、互利、冷漠和反对"等四种关系。乡村利益主体之间多种混合关系形成的原因在于村级组织"半国家半社会""半控制半自主",以及村干部"半干部半农民"的模糊特征,这使村干部能在不同的场景和规则之间自主切换角色。这些混合关系、模糊特征和角色切换正是因为国家在乡村社会采取的公共权力单边委托和"模糊治理术"而形成的。事实上国家已认识到了村民自治制度的缺陷和农村基层"小官巨腐"的严重性,然而,并未进行相关制度的重构,这不但与国家治理的有效性目标相矛盾,而且进一步加深了单边委托和"模糊治理术"的运用,形成了制度的非良性循环。
Abstract:
At present, interests bodies form complex, fast changing but irrational cooperation relationships in rural society. In the relationship, the cadres at village, town and county-town levels formed work and collusion relationships; the rural cadres and villagers formed four hybrid relationships of support, mutual benefit, indifference and opponents. The reasons of such hybrid relationships in the rural interest subjects are due to such ambiguous quality as semi-nation and semi-society, semi-control and semi-freedom in the village level organizations as well as identity ambiguity of being semi-cadres and semi-peasant for rural cadres. This situation facilitates the rural cadres using all kinds of tactics on different occasions and in different games. The hybrid relationships and ambiguity of village organizations and village cadres are the very result caused by unilateral delegation of ambiguity governing mentality which is used by the nation to address the village government dilemma. In fact, the state has learned the defect of villagers self-governance and severity of low-level officials’ corruption at rural cadres, however, the state has failed to rebuild the systems. This not only conflicts with the goal of state governance validity, but also further encourages the usage of unilateral trust and ambiguity governing mentality, which forms a non-virtuous circle on the system.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杜赞奇.国家、权力与文化网络[M].王福明,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,1996:238.
[2] 宿胜军.从"保护人"到"承包人"[M]//杨善华,王思斌.社会转型:北京大学青年学者的探索.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002:113.
[3] 徐勇.村干部的双重角色:当家人与代理人[J].二十一世纪(香港),1997(8).
[4] 卢福营.论村民自治运作中的公共参与[J].政治学研究,2004(1).
[5] 付英.村干部的三重角色及政策思考——基于征地补偿的考察[J].清华大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2014(3).
[6] 龚春明.精致的利己主义者:村干部角色及"无为之治"——以赣东D镇九村为例[J].南京农业大学学报:社会科学版,2015(3).
[7] 狄金华.从主体到规则的转向——中国传统农村的基层治理研究[J].社会学研究,2014(5).
[8] 塔尔科特帕森斯.社会行动的结构[M].张明德,夏遇南,彭刚,译.南京:译林出版社,2012:48-56.
[9] 张静.基层政权:乡村制度诸问题[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007:11.
[10] 肖瑛.从"国家与社会"到"制度与生活":中国社会变迁研究的视角转换[J].中国社会科学,2014(9).
[11] Scott J C. Patron-client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia[J].The American Political Science Review, 1972,66(1):91-113.
[12] 吴毅.小镇喧嚣[M].北京:三联书店出版社,2007:615.
[13] 周雪光.基层政府间的共谋行为——一个政府行为的制度逻辑[J].社会学研究,2008(6).
[14] Thomas H, Gunter S. County and Township Cadres as a Strategic Group:A New Approach to Political Agency in China’s Local State[J].Journal of Chinese Political Science,2012(17):221-249.
[15] 徐勇.村民自治的成长:行政放权与社会发育——1990年代后期以来中国村民自治发展进程的反思[J].华中师范大学报:人文社会科学版,2005(2).
[16] 贺雪峰.新乡土中国[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013:20.
[17] Anthony. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1957(2):559-582.
[18] 曹锦清.黄河边的中国[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,2013:107.
[19] 黄宗智.集权的简约治理——中国以准官员和纠纷解决为主的半正式基层行政[J].开放时代,2008(2).
[20] 乔尔S米格代尔.社会中的国家——国家与社会如何相互改变与相互构成[M].李杨,郭一聪,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2013:20.
[21] 狄金华.被困的治理:河镇的复合治理与农户策略(1980-2009)[M].北京:三联书店,2015:98.
[22] Wang G H. Tamed Village‘Democracy’Elections, Governance and Clientelism in a Contemporary Chinese Village[M]. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag Press,2014:90.
[23] He B G. Rural Democracy in China:The role of Village Elections[M].New York:Palgrave Macmillian Press.2007:152-154.
[24] 田雄.虚置与重构:村民自治的主体缺失与制度干预——以长三角北翼黄江县为例[J].南京农业大学学报:社会科学版,2015(3).
[25] 吴重庆.无主体熟人社会及社会重建[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014:169.
[26] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.关于深入推进农村社区建设试点工作的指导意见[N].人民日报,2015-06-01(01).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:田雄,男,华东理工大学社会学系博士生,中国城乡发展研究中心研究人员,E-mail:tianxiong2049@126.com;王伯承,男,华东理工大学社会学系博士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01