[1]班涛.失衡与重构：“单向度”治理、阶层结构与底层抗争——基于浙北S村的经验分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):48-56.
　BAN Tao.Unbalanced Rural Governance and Remodeling Rural Governance—Single Dimensional Governance, Class Structure and Underclass Struggle:Based on Empirical Studies of S County in Northern Zhejiang[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):48-56.
点击复制

失衡与重构：“单向度”治理、阶层结构与底层抗争——基于浙北S村的经验分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
48-56
栏目:
乡村治理
出版日期:
2017-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Unbalanced Rural Governance and Remodeling Rural Governance—Single Dimensional Governance, Class Structure and Underclass Struggle:Based on Empirical Studies of S County in Northern Zhejiang
作者:
班涛
武汉大学 社会学系, 湖北 武汉 430072
Author(s):
BAN Tao
关键词:
阶层分化; 底层抗争; “压制型”结构; 阶层之气
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
底层抗争的既有研究强调行动者的主观能动性，对行动与结构关系关注较少，文章从阶层关系结构角度分析底层抗争。在东部经济发达村庄阶层分化背景下，富人阶层成为村庄治理的单一主体，且依照私人化逻辑开展治理，形成"单向度"治理格局，底层成为村庄治理中被动的他者，在村庄利益分配结构中处于边缘地位。富人阶层主导的治理秩序产生的结果即为利益分配的失衡，底层作为利益分配格局中的不利一方，通过抗争行动调适利益分配秩序成为其合理选择。底层抗争实践包括正式行动与弱者的武器两种类型，然而底层抗争面临着被瓦解的困境，归根结底在于"压制型"阶层结构，即富人依托权力关系与文化象征双重网络将底层笼罩于其中，底层难以冲破这一结构之网。底层抗争的受阻以及底层在村庄社会生活的被区隔推动了阶层之气的积聚与升华，阶层间对抗行为几率增加。底层抗争从根本上得以缓解的路径在于重构村庄治理格局与阶层关系结构，重构上述结构主要依托外部国家力量，以最终实现村庄社会的和谐有序与良性运行。
Abstract:
The previous studies on underclass struggle lay particular stress on emphasizing actors’ subjective initiative, at the cost of attention to the relationship between action and structure. This paper aims to analyze the underclass struggle from the angle of stratum relation structure. In the background of stratum differentiation in some eastern developed villages, the rich become the only subject who govern villages according to their personal logic. So the underclass become passives in this process and they are weak in the benefits distribution structure. This paper calls this kind of village governance order as one dimensional governance. The governance order which is dominated by the rich must cause the unbalance of benefits distribution. In addition, the underclass, as the adverse side in the structure of benefits distribution, have to choose to adjust the benefits distribution order through struggle. Underclass struggle includes the formal action and the ‘weapons’ of the weak. However, underclass struggle is faced with being dissolved. The essential reason is the repressive stratum structure, that is, the rich use power relations and cultural symbols to build this structure and the underclass can’t break through it. Stratum struggle is mainly caused the underclass’ suffering from many obstacles from the rich and being often socially ghettoized in the villages, nursing the dissatisfaction and complaint feeling on the part of the underclass and intensifying the risk of struggle between the rich and the underclass. The basic way of alleviating the tension is to reconstruct the structure of village governance and stratum relation. The reconstruction must rely on the external power from the state government in order to realize the good operation of the village ultimately.

参考文献/References:

[1] 查尔斯 蒂利,道格 麦克亚当,西德尼 塔罗.斗争的动力[M].屈平,李义中,译.南京:译林出版社,2006:9.
[2] 李连江,欧博文.当代中国农民的依法抗争[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2008:2.
[3] 于建嵘. 当前农民维权活动的一个解释框架[J]. 社会学研究,2004(2):49-55.
[4] 陈锋.从抗争政治、底层政治到非抗争政治[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1):20-27.
[5] 董海军."作为武器的弱者身份":农民维权抗争的底层政治[J].社会,2008(4):34-58.
[6] 折晓叶.合作和非对抗性抵制——弱者的"韧武器"[J].社会学研究,2008(3):1-28.
[7] 罗亚娟.依情理抗争:农民抗争行为的乡土性[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2):26-33.
[8] 徐昕.为权利而自杀——转型中国农民工的"以死抗争"[J].中国制度变迁的案例研究,2008:255-305.
[9] 吴毅."权力—利益的结构之网"与农民群体利益的表达困境——对一起石场纠纷案例的分析[J].社会学研究,2007(5):21-45.
[10] 何绍辉.隐性维权与农民群体性利益表达及困境[J].人文杂志,2008(6):170-176.
[11] 田先红.阶层政治与农民上访的逻辑——基于浙北C镇的案例研究[J].政治学研究,2015(6):98-109.
[12] 詹姆斯 斯科特. 弱者的武器[M].郑广怀,张敏,何江穗,译.南京:译林出版社,2011:290.
[13] 杨华.农村阶层关系研究的若干理论问题[J].人文杂志,2013(4):108-116.
[14] 詹姆斯 斯科特.农民的道义经济学——东南亚的反叛与生存[M].程立显,刘健,译.南京:译林出版社,1976:13-14.
[15] 应星."气"与中国乡村集体行动的再生产[J].开放时代,2007(6):106-120.
[16] 陈柏峰.仪式性人情与村庄经济分层的社会确认[J].广东社会科学,2011(2):206-213.
[17] 袁松.农民分化与先富阶层的社会确认[J].人文杂志,2014(7):108-112.
[18] 徐加玉,左停.村级权力规范化中的治理动力问题——基于浙江N县的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(4):53-59.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘锐.土地流转、阶层分化与乡村治理转型——基于湖北省京山J村的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(02):92.
[2]杨华.农村阶层研究的范式论纲：实体论与关系论[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(03):11.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(04):11.
[3]李婷.阶层分化下的村庄派性选举与民主决策——基于浙东N县D村的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(01):40.
　LI Ting.Stratum of Villagers’ Autonomy: Factional Struggle and Democratic Decision: Based on Village D, County N, Zhejiang Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):40.
[4]陈锋.“气”与阶层的“生活政治”——基于浙东平镇西村的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(06):1.
　CHEN Feng.“Qi” and “Life Politics” of Rural Class Differentiation:Base on the Investigation of Xi Village of Ping Town in East Zhejiang[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):1.
[5]杨华,罗兴佐.阶层分化、资源动员与村级贿选现象——以东部地区G镇调查为基础[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):56.
　YANG Hua,LUO Xingzuo.Stratification, Resource Mobilization and Bribery in the Village Election: Based on the Survey of G Village in the Eastern Area[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):56.
[6]杨华.农村人情竞争的区域差异及其治理[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(02):71.
　YANG Hua.Regional Differences in Rural Social Etiquette Competition and Its Governance[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):71.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-06-25。
基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"完善基层社会治理机制研究"（14JZD030）
作者简介:班涛,男,武汉大学社会学系博士生。E-mail:553747773@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-20