[1]仇童伟.土地确权如何影响农民的产权安全感知?——基于土地产权历史情景的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):95-109.
　Qiu Tongwei.Impacts of Registration of Rural Land on Farmers’ Land Tenure Security Perception: Based on Historical Scenes of Land Tenure[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):95-109.
点击复制

土地确权如何影响农民的产权安全感知?——基于土地产权历史情景的分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
95-109
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2017-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impacts of Registration of Rural Land on Farmers’ Land Tenure Security Perception: Based on Historical Scenes of Land Tenure
作者:
仇童伟
华南农业大学 国家农业制度与发展研究院, 广东 广州 510642
Author(s):
Qiu Tongwei
关键词:
土地产权; 土地确权; 产权安全感知; 产权经历; 产权历史情景
分类号:
F301.1
摘要:
文章在建构土地产权经历、产权历史情景与土地产权安全感知逻辑关联性的基础上，利用江苏省和江西省的1410户农户调查数据，分析了在不同土地产权历史情景中，土地确权对农民土地产权安全感知的影响。理论分析表明，土地确权的作用受产权历史情景和农民产权经历的影响，表现出情景依赖和经验依赖特征。在土地调整感知和失地风险感知表征土地产权安全感知的基础上，模型估计结果表明：第一，在土地调整较少而征地较多的产权情景中，土地确权抑制了经历过土地调整农民的产权安全感知，但对与征地相关的感知影响不显著。第二，在土地调整较多而征地较少的产权情景中，土地确权抑制了未经历过土地调整农民的产权安全感知，并提高了持有土地法律文书的农民的产权安全感知。文章还发现，由于所处产权历史情景的差异，土地产权经历会扩大农民土地产权安全感知的差异，土地确权在降低农民土地产权安全感知差异方面的作用尚不明显。据此，文章从明晰土地法律、优化产权实施和强化农民的土地权属认知等方面提出了政策建议。
Abstract:
The paper firstly analyzes the logical relevance among land tenure experience, historical scene and land tenure security perception, and then employs 1410 households survey data collected in Jiangsu Province and Jiangxi Province to analyze the impacts of registration of rural land on farmers’ land tenure security perception in different historical scenes. The theoretical result indicates that the influence of registration of rural land, impacted by historical scene of land tenure and farmers’ land tenure experiences, presents the characteristics of situation dependence and experience dependence. Based on the fact that land tenure security perception is characterized by land adjustment perception and land-losing perception, the model estimation result indicates that, firstly, the registration of rural land hinders the land right security perception of farmers with land adjustment experiences, but does not significantly affect the land acquisition-related cognition in the situation of less land adjustment and more land acquisition; secondly, the registration of rural land hinders the land right security perception of farmers without land adjustment experience and increases the land right security perception of farmers with land certificates in the situation of more land adjustment and less land acquisition; thirdly, due to the historical difference in land right, land right experience expands the difference of land tenure security perception between farmers. So far, the effect of land registration on reducing the differences in farmers’ land right security perception is not obvious. Therefore, the paper puts forward some policy suggestions to clarify land laws, perfect tenure implementation and strengthen farmers’ land ownership awareness to develop farmers’ land tenure security perception.

参考文献/References:

[1] Wang H, Tong J, Su F, et al. To Reallocate or not: Reconsidering the Dilemma in China’s Agricultural Land Tenure Policy[J]. Land Use Policy, 2011, 28(4): 805-814.
[2] Lohmar B, Zhang Z, Somwaru A. Land Rental Market Development and Agricultural Production in China[R]. Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, 2001. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/20683/1/sp01lo01.pdf.
[3] Broegaard R J. Land Tenure Insecurity and Inequality in Nicaragua[J]. Development and Change, 2005, 36(5): 845-864.
[4] de La Rupelle M, Quheng D, Shi L, et al. Land Rights Insecurity and Temporary Migration in Rural China[R]. IZA Discussion Paper No.4668, Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2010. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=153067IZA.
[5] Reerink G, van Gelder J L. Land Titling, Perceived Tenure Security and Housing Consolidation in the Kampongs of Bandung, Indonesia[J]. Habitat International, 2010, 34(1): 78-85.
[6] Van Gelder J L. Feeling and Thinking: Quantifying the Relationship between Perceived Tenure Security and Housing Improvement in an Informal Neighborhood in Buenos Aires[J]. Habitat International, 2007, 31(2): 219-231.
[7] Ma X, Heerink N, van Ierland E, et al. Land Tenure Security and Land Investments in Northwest China[J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2013, 5(2): 281-307.
[8] 谢利 泰勒, 戴维 西尔斯, 利蒂希亚 安妮 佩普卢. 社会心理学[M]. 崔丽娟, 王彦,等,译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2010.
[9] 马贤磊, 仇童伟, 钱忠好. 土地产权经历、产权情景对农民产权安全感知的影响——基于土地法律执行视角[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015(4): 111-121.
[10] McGuire W J. Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches[M]//Berkowitz L. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1964, 1:192-229 .
[11] North D C. Economic Performance through Time[J].American Economic Review, 1994, 84(3): 359-368.
[12] 程令国, 张晔, 刘志彪. 农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗?[J]. 管理世界, 2015(1): 88-98.
[13] 付江涛, 纪月清, 胡浩. 新一轮承包地确权登记颁证是否促进了农户的土地流转——来自江苏省3县(市、区)的经验证据[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(1): 105-113.
[14] 胡新艳, 罗必良. 新一轮农地确权与促进流转: 粤赣证据[J]. 改革, 2016(4): 85-94.
[15] 陈昭玖, 胡雯. 农地确权、交易装置与农户生产环节外包——基于"斯密—杨格"定理的分工演化逻辑[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016(8): 16-24.
[16] 黄季焜, 冀县卿. 农地使用权确权与农户对农地的长期投资[J]. 管理世界, 2012(9): 76-81.
[17] Holden S, Yohannes H. Land Redistribution, Tenure Insecurity, and Intensity of Production: A Study of Farm Households in Southern Ethiopia[J]. Land Economics, 2002, 78(4): 573-590.
[18] Deininger K, Jin S. Security Property Rights in Transition: Lessons from Implementation of China’s Rural Land Contracting Law [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009, 70(1): 22-38.
[19] 陈锡文, 赵阳, 陈剑波, 等. 2009中国农村制度变迁60年[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 41-42.
[20] 马贤磊, 仇童伟, 钱忠好. 农地产权安全性与农地流转市场的农户参与——基于江苏、湖北、广西、黑龙江四省(区)调查数据的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015(2): 22-37.
[21] Fiske S T, Taylor S E. Social Cognition (2nd ed.)[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
[22] von Hecker U. On Memory Effects of Heiderian Balance: A Code Hypothesis and an Inconsistency Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 29(4): 45-52.
[23] Heider F. Psychology of Interpersonal Relations[M]. New York: Wiley, 1958.
[24] Abelson R P. Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook[J]. Theories of Cognitive Consistency a Sourcebook, 1968.
[25] Stone J, Cooper J. A Self-standard Model of Cognitive Dissonance[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001, 37(3): 228-243.
[26] Lavine H, Huff J W, Wagner S H, et al. The Moderating Influence of Attitude Strength on the Susceptibility to Context Effects in Attitude Survey[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75(2): 359-373.
[27] Zhang Y, Wang X, Glauben T,et al. The Impact of Land Reallocation on Technical Efficiency: Evidence from China[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2011, 11(4): 495-507.
[28] 黄季琨, 陶然, 徐志刚. 制度变迁和可持续发展: 30年中国农业与农村[M]. 上海:格致出版社,2008.
[29] 钱忠好. 农村土地承包经营权产权残缺与市场流转困境: 理论与政策分析[J]. 管理世界, 2002(6): 35-45.
[30] Brandt A S, Gaspart F, Platteau J P. Land Tenure Security and Investment Incentives: Puzzling Evidence from Burkina Faso[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2002, 67(2): 373-418.
[31] Albarracin D, Wyer R S. The Cognitive Impact of Past Behavior: Influences on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Future Behavioral Decisions[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(1): 5-22.
[32] Ma X, Heerink N, Ierland E, et al. Land Tenure Insecurity and Rural-urban Migration in Rural China[J]. Papers in Region Science, 2016, 95(2): 383-406.
[33] Ma X. Does Tenure Security Matter? : Rural Household Responses to Land Tenure Reforms in Northwest China [D]. Wageningen U R, 2013.
[34] Duncombe W, Robbins M D, Stonecash J. Measuring Citizen Preferences for Service Using Surveys: Dose a ’Gray Peril’ Threaten Public Funding for Education?[J]. Public Budgeting and Finance, 2003, 23(1): 45-72.
[35] Lewis B D, Pattinasarany D. Determining Citizen Satisfaction with Local Public Education in Indonesia: The Significance of Actual Service Quality and Governance Conditions[J]. Growth and Change, 2009, 40(1): 85-115.
[36] 高琳. 分权与民生: 财政自主权影响公共服务满意度的经验研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012(7): 86-98.
[37] Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2008, 22(1): 31-72.
[38] Lanza S T, Moore J E, Butera N M. Drawing Causal Inferences Using Propensity Scores: A Practical Guide for Community Psychologists[J]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2013, 52(3-4): 380-392.
[39] 贺雪峰. 农地承包经营权确权的出路[J]. 党政视野, 2015(11): 61-61.
[40] 傅晨, 任辉. 农业转移人口市民化背景下农村土地制度创新的机理: 一个分析框架[J]. 经济学家, 2014(3): 74-83.
[41] 罗必良. 农地流转的市场逻辑——"产权强度—禀赋效应—交易装置"的分析线索及案例研究[J]. 南方经济, 2014(5): 1-24.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄金升,陈利根.土地产权制度与管制制度的制度均衡分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(01):82.
　HUANG Jinsheng,CHEN Ligen.An Institutional Equilibrium Analysison Land Property Rights System and Regulation System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):82.
[2]仇童伟,沈怡,马贤磊.土地产权环境对农民产权安全认知偏差的影响--基于不同类型农户的比较分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(01):92.
　QIU Tongwei,SHEN Yi,MA Xianlei.Impact of Land Tenure Environment on Farmers’ Tenure Security Cognition Bias: Based on a Comparative Analysis between Different Types of Households[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):92.
[3]付江涛,纪月清,胡浩.新一轮承包地确权登记颁证是否促进了农户的土地流转--来自江苏省3县(市、区)的经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(01):105.
　FU Jiangtao,JI Yueqing,HU Hao.Does New-Round Land Confirmation, Registration and Certification Boost the Land Transfer among Farmers? An Empirical Evidence from 3 Counties in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):105.
[4]陆剑,陈振涛.我国农村土地承包经营权确权:规则模糊及其厘清[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(03):95.
　LU Jian,CHEN Zhentao.Confirming Contracted Management Rights of Rural Land System:Fuzziness and Clarification[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):95.
[5]黄鹏进.产权秩序转型:农村集体土地纠纷的一个宏观解释[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):86.
　HUANG Pengjin.Transformation of Land Property Order: A Macroscopic Cognition on Large-Scale Land Disputes in Rural China[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):86.
[6]仇童伟.宗族如何影响村庄地权的实施?——基于村庄民主选举的情景界分与实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):72.
　QIU Tongwei.The Impacts of Clan on Rural Land Tenure Implementation: Based on the Situational Division and Evidential Studies of Village Democratic Election[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):72.
[7]孙新华,柳泽凡,周佩萱.“三权”分置中的地权整合与土地集中利用——以皖南河镇为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(01):2.
　SUN Xinhua,LIU Zefan,ZHOU Peixuan.Land Rights Integration in the “Three Rights” Separation and Centralized Use of Land: Evidence from River Town in the South of Anhui Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(04):2.
[8]许恒周,牛坤在.城乡土地融合发展：概念内涵、历史演进与机制设计[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(05):141.
　XU Hengzhou,NIU Kunzai.The Development of Urban-rural Land Integration: Conceptual Connotation, Historical Evolution, and Mechanism Design[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(04):141.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-01-27。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目"农村土地与相关要素市场培育与改革研究"（71333004）；国家自然科学基金项目"农地流转模式、流转契约与农业规模经营模式组合：驱动力、绩效与机制设计"（71373127）；"广东大学生科技创新培育专项资金"（pdjh2017a0077）
作者简介:仇童伟,男,华南农业大学国家农业制度与发展研究院博士生。E-mail:15150561782@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-20