[1]严俊,林伟挚.神圣空间与信仰规范的动态均衡——以雷州“香火屋”的变迁为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):69-80.
 YAN Jun,LIN Weizhi.The Dynamic Equilibrium of Sacred Space and Belief Norms: Taking the Changes of Xianghuo-house in Leizhou Peninsula as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):69-80.
点击复制

神圣空间与信仰规范的动态均衡——以雷州“香火屋”的变迁为例()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
19
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
69-80
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2019-03-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Dynamic Equilibrium of Sacred Space and Belief Norms: Taking the Changes of Xianghuo-house in Leizhou Peninsula as an Example
作者:
严俊 林伟挚
上海大学 社会学院, 上海 200433
Author(s):
YAN Jun LIN Weizhi
关键词:
香火屋神圣空间信仰规范动态均衡
Keywords:
xianghuo-housesacred spacebelief normsdynamic equilibrium
分类号:
C912.4
摘要:
空间的社会文化意义及其变迁过程是社会科学研究的重要议题。借助雷州半岛地区"香火屋"与家族信仰规范的丰富资料,本文提出了一个基于合法性约束下个体行动选择的"神圣空间——信仰规范"动态均衡分析框架,尝试说明当代急剧的社会变迁对传统空间与文化观念造成的影响。研究发现,村民在面对人地矛盾、城市化导致的经济激励和国家力量干预时,会采取不同的策略改造空间或观念,最终形成多样化的新均衡。对比既有研究范式,新的分析框架不仅有助于理解"香火屋"空间变迁的观念基础和决策机制,还为探索家族信仰规范演化的空间影响提供了思路。
Abstract:
The socio-cultural significance of space and its changing process are important topics in social science research. Using the rich material of the xianghuo-houses and family belief in the Leizhou Peninsula, this paper proposes a dynamic equilibrium analysis framework of "sacred space-belief norms" based on individual action choices under legal constraints and tries to illustrate the impacts of dramatic changes in contemporary society on traditional spaces and cultural ideas. The study found that when facing the contradictions between man and land, the economic incentives caused by urbanization, and the intervention of state power, the villagers will adopt different strategies to transform space or concepts, and eventually form a diversified new equilibrium. Contrasting existing paradigm, the new analytical framework not only helps to understand the conceptual basis and decision-making mechanism of the spatial changes of xianghuo-house, but also provides approaches for exploring the spatial impact on the evolution of family belief.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨庆堃.中国社会中的宗教[M].范丽珠,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2007:42.
[2] 阮晳鸣,梁林,陆琦.雷州市南兴镇东林村新旧村聚落空间特征延续性探析[J].南方建筑, 2013(5):74-79.
[3] 梁林.雷州民居[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2013:78.
[4] 王媛,曹树基.浙南山区明代普通民居发现的意义——以松阳县石仓为例[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(2):73-80.
[5] 赵巧艳.魂聚与魂移:侗族传统民居堂屋的共魂意象表征[J].宗教学研究,2016(1):145-151.
[6] 王媛."香火堂":血缘的依附与独立——石仓阙盛宗家族1710-1850年的住屋史[J].史林,2011(5):85-59.
[7] 黄卫.体与魂的双重居所——孟定"傣德"家屋研究[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(4):39-43.
[8] 叶涯剑.空间社会学的方法论和基本概念解析[J].贵州社会科学,2006(1):68-70.
[9] 爱弥儿涂尔干.宗教生活的基本形式[M].渠敬东,汲喆,译.北京:商务印书馆,2011:13.
[10] 郑震.空间:一个社会学的概念[J].社会学研究,2010(5):167-191.
[11] 路易斯亨利摩尔根.美洲土著的房屋和家庭生活[M].李培茱,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1985:111.
[12] 刘志扬.居住空间的文化建构:白马藏族房屋变迁的个案分析[J].民族研究,2011(3):25-34.
[13] 丁传标,赵永琪,陶伟.城市化进程中家屋空间重构的过程、内容与逻辑——以广州珠村为例[J].地理科学,2017(9):1326-1336.
[14] Kong L. The Sacred and the Secular:Exploring Contemporary Meanings and Values for Religious Buildings in Singapore[J]. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 1992(1):18-42.
[15] 盖奥格尔西美尔.社会学:关于社会化形式的研究[M].林荣远,译.北京:华夏出版社,2002:460.
[16] 亨利列斐伏尔.空间:社会的产物与使用价值[M]//包亚明.现代性与空间的生产.上海:上海教育出版社,2003:47-58.
[17] 米歇尔福柯.不同空间的正文与上下文[M]//包亚明.后现代性与地理学的政治.上海:上海教育出版社,2001:18-28.
[18] 何雪松.社会理论的空间转向[J].社会,2006(2):34-49.
[19] 赵巧艳.空间实践与文化表征:侗族传统民居的象征人类学研究[M].北京:民族出版社,2014:43-48.
[20] 范可."再地方化"与象征资本:一个闽南回族社区近年来的若干建筑表现[J].开放时代,2005(2):43-61.
[21] 董敬畏.空间、家屋与人观——以关中邓村为例[J].北方民族大学学报,2011(2):119-124.
[22] 胡斌.试析西方人文社会学科中的"空间研究"问题——以列维·斯特劳斯的人类学研究为范本[J].浙江社会科学,2015(3):103-109.
[23] 郑向春.从家屋到客房:一个景颇村寨的房屋生命史研究[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2017(6):73-80.
[24] 丁传标,古恒宇,陶伟.空间句法在中国人文地理学研究中的应用进展评述[J].热带地理,2015(4):515-521.
[25] 陶伟,丁传标.家的解码:空间句法对家空间研究的内容与方法[J].地理科学,2015(11):1364-1371.
[26] Kong L. Geography and Religion:Trends and Prospects[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1990(3):355-371.
[27] Bunnell T, Kong L, Law L. Country Reports:Social and Cultural Geographies of South-East Asia[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2005(1):135-149.
[28] Kong L. Negotiating Conceptions of "Sacred Space":A Case Study of Religious Buildings in Singapore[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1993(3):342-358.
[29] Kong L. No Place, New Places:Death and Its Rituals in Urban Asia[J]. Urban Studies, 2012(2):415-433.
[30] Yeoh B S A, Hui T B. The Politics of Space:Changing Discourses on Chinese Burial Grounds in Post-War Singapore[J]. Journal of Historical Geography, 1995(2):184-201.
[31] Kong L. The Commercial Face of God:Exploring the Nexus between the Religious and the Material[M]//Rinschede G, Vossen J. Studies on the Geography of Religion 1995. Berlin:Reimer, 1996:123-141.
[32] Erb M. Tourism Space in Manggarai, Western Flores, Indonesia:the House as A Contested Place[J]. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 1998(2):177-192.
[33] Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance[M]. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1957.
[34] 陶伟,程明洋,符文颖.城市化进程中广州城中村传统宗族文化的重构[J].地理学报,2015(12):1987-2000.
[35] Tao J, Chen H, Zhang S, et al. Space and Culture:Isomerism in Vernacular Dwellings in Meizhou, Guangdong Province, China[J].Journal of Asian Architecture & Building Engineering, 2018(17):15-22.
[36] Low S. Spatializing Culture:An Engaged Anthropological Approach to Space and Place(2014)[M]//Gieseking J, Mangold W, Katz C, Low S, Saegert S. The People, Place, and Space Reader. New York:Routledge, 2014:34-38.
[37] 詹姆斯斯科特.国家的视角:那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].王晓毅,译.北京:社科文献出版社,2012.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-07-05。
基金项目:上海市人力资源和社会保障局资助项目"上海市浦江人才计划《财产起源与村落边界》"(14PJC052)
作者简介:严俊,男,上海大学社会学院讲师;林伟挚,男,上海大学社会学院博士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01