[1]方超.义务教育改革、教育收益率与农村劳动力的工资差异——基于劳动力市场的教育政策效果评估[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(02):159-170.
　FANG Chao.Reform of Compulsory Education, Return on Education and the Wage Difference of Rural Labor Force: Effect Evaluation of Education Policy Based on Labor Market[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):159-170.
点击复制

义务教育改革、教育收益率与农村劳动力的工资差异——基于劳动力市场的教育政策效果评估()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
159-170
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2021-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reform of Compulsory Education, Return on Education and the Wage Difference of Rural Labor Force: Effect Evaluation of Education Policy Based on Labor Market
作者:
方超
南京财经大学 公共管理学院, 江苏 南京 210023
Author(s):
FANG Chao
关键词:
义务教育改革; 政策效果评价; 教育收益率; 工资差异; 黏地板效应
Keywords:
Reform of Compulsory Education; Policy Effect Evaluation; Return on Education; Wage Difference; Sticky Floor Effect
分类号:
F323.6
摘要:
利用中国家庭收入调查数据，基于《中华人民共和国义务教育法》提供的自然实验，通过因果性与异质性教育收益率的测量及工资差异的分解，实证评估了义务教育和义务教育改革对农村劳动力工资水平的影响，结果发现：（1）利用基准回归测得农村劳动力的教育收益率和义务教育收益率分别为4.6%和14.9%；（2）利用倾向得分匹配法与处理效应模型纠正了可观测和不可观测异质性后，发现农村劳动力的义务教育收益率约为14.2%~19.4%与33.6%~34.3%；（3）利用无条件分位数回归及其分解的研究方法揭示了义务教育改革的异质性增收特征表现为对低收入群体具有更强的个体增收效应，总体工资差异具有"黏地板效应"的鲜明特征。
Abstract:
Based on the data of CHIP 2014 and natural experiments provided by the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Compulsory Education, this paper analyzes the impact of compulsory education reform on the wage level of rural labor force by measuring the return rate of causality and heterogeneity education and the decomposition of wage difference, It is indicated that: according to the benchmark regression, the return on education and compulsory education of rural labor force are 4.6% and 14.9% respectively; it is found that the return rates of compulsory education of rural labor force are about 14.2%~19.4% and 33.6%~34.3% after correcting observable and unobservable heterogeneity by PSM and TEM; it reveals that the heterogeneity of compulsory education reform has a stronger individual income increase effect on low-income groups, while the overall wage difference has a distinct feature of "sticky floor effect" by using UQR and FFL.

参考文献/References:

[1] Psacharopoulos G, Patrinos H A. Returns to Investment in Education:A Further Update[J]. Education Economics, 2004, 12(2):111-134.
[2] 曹黎娟,颜孝坤.城乡居民教育收益率的差距——一个分阶段的考察[J].复旦教育论坛,2016,14(5):81-88.
[3] 邓峰,丁小浩.中国教育收益率的长期变动趋势分析[J].统计研究,2013,30(7):39-47.
[4] 方超,罗英姿.中国农村居民的教育回报及其变动趋势研究——兼论农村地区人力资本梯度升级的现实意义[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(3):74-85,157.
[5] Lu M, Zhang X. Towards an Intelligent Country:China’s Higher Education Expansion and Rural Children’s Senior High School Participation[J]. Economic Systems, 2019, 43(2):1-14.
[6] 杨娟,高曼.教育扩张对农民收入的影响——以文革期间的农村教育扩张政策为例[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015(6):48-58.
[7] 刘生龙,周绍杰,胡鞍钢.义务教育法与中国城镇教育回报率:基于断点回归设计[J].经济研究,2016,51(2):154-167.
[8] 赵西亮. 教育、户籍转换与城乡教育收益率差异[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(12):164-178.
[9] 贾婧,柯睿.免费义务教育政策与农村人力资本积累——基于CFPS的实证研究[J].教育与经济,2020(1):19-30.
[10] 方超,黄斌.教育扩张与农村劳动力的教育收益率——基于分位数处理效应的异质性估计[J].经济评论,2020(4):81-96.
[11] Blinder A S. Wage Discrimination:Reduced Form and Structural Estimates[J]. Journal of Human Resources, 1973, 8(4):436.
[12] 吴珊珊,孟凡强.农民工歧视与反歧视问题研究进展[J].经济学动态,2019(4):99-111.
[13] 张广胜, 陈技伟, 江金启, 等. 性别歧视、行业间隔与农民工的性别工资差异:基于改进的Brown分解[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2016, 15(3):290-299.
[14] 孟凡强,初帅,李艳.城乡工资差异的教育溯源:基于前市场歧视的视角[J].中央财经大学学报,2018(2):88-98.
[15] Autor D H, Katz L F, Kearney M S. Rising Wage Inequality:The Role of Composition and Prices[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, 2005.
[16] Chi W, Li B. Glass Ceiling or Sticky Floor? Examining the Gender Earnings Differential across the Earnings Distribution in Urban China, 1987-2004[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2008, 36(2):243-263.
[17] 屈小博.城镇本地与迁移劳动力工资差异的变化:"天花板"还是"黏地板"?[J].财经研究,2014(6):109-120.
[18] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods that Incorporate the Propensity Score[J]. The American Statistician, 1985, 39(1):33-38.
[19] 邓睿.身份的就业效应——"城市人"身份认同影响农民工就业质量的经验考察[J].经济体制改革,2019(5):91-104.
[20] 朱平芳, 邸俊鹏. 无条件分位数处理效应方法及其应用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2017, 34(2):139-155.
[21] Firpo S P, Fortin N M, Lemieux T. Decomposing Wage Distributions Using Recentered Influence Function Regressions[J]. Econometrics, 2018, 6(2):28.
[22] Imbens G W. Matching Methods in Practice:Three Examples[J]. Journal of Human Resources, 2015,50(2):373-419.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-12-16。
基金项目:2020年度江苏省社会科学基金课题"流动人口视角下经济转型时期教育扩张政策的收入分配效应研究"（20JYC007）；南京财经大学2020年度高等教育及改革发展重点课题"教育扩张政策的收入分配效应研究"（GJGF202006）
作者简介:方超,男,南京财经大学公共管理学院讲师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01