[1]李尚蒲,张路瑶.转出抑或撂荒:外包服务对小农户的挤出效应——来自河南省麦农的证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(05):136-149.
　LI Shangpu,ZHANG Luyao.Transfer or Abandonment: The “Crowding out” Effect of Outsourcing Services on Small Farmers—Evidence from Wheat Farmers in Henan Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(05):136-149.
点击复制

转出抑或撂荒:外包服务对小农户的挤出效应——来自河南省麦农的证据()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
136-149
栏目:
专题:农地撂荒问题研究
出版日期:
2022-11-12

文章信息/Info

Title:
Transfer or Abandonment: The “Crowding out” Effect of Outsourcing Services on Small Farmers—Evidence from Wheat Farmers in Henan Province
作者:
李尚蒲;  张路瑶
华南农业大学 国家农业制度与发展研究院, 广东 广州 510642
Author(s):
LI Shangpu;  ZHANG Luyao
关键词:
农地转出; 农地撂荒; 外包服务; 农机服务市场; 农地流转市场
Keywords:
Land Transfer; Abandonment of Farmland; Outsourcing Services; Agricultural Machinery Service Market; Farmland Transfer Market
分类号:
F321.1
摘要:
小农户退出农地经营,不仅涉及中国农业经营主体转换与基本经营制度变革的基础性问题,而且关联到国家农业安全特别是粮食安全等重大议题。农机服务市场发育对小农户农地经营是否存在着"挤出"效应,尚未得到一致结论。利用河南省小麦种植样本农户数据进行实证分析,结果表明:(1)外包服务促进了小农户退出农地经营,主要表现为促进农地转出而不是农地撂荒,且对均值规模以下的农户退出行为的影响更为明显。(2)异质性分析并未改变外包服务对农地经营影响的主效应,且要素市场发育亦有利于推动农地转出,并有效抑制农地撂荒。(3)进一步的分析表明,服务价格上涨推动了农户退出农地经营,但外包服务的本地化则减缓了农地经营的退出。文章认为,应该关注外包服务的"双刃剑"作用,加快相关要素市场的发育及其匹配,搭建农机服务信息平台,稳妥推进小农户农地经营退出的相关制度建设。
Abstract:
The withdrawal of small farmers from farmland operation not only involves the fundamental issues of the transformation of agricultural operation subjects and the reform of basic operation system in China, but also relates to the national agricultural security, especially food security. On whether the development of agricultural machinery service market has "crowding out" effect on smallholders’ farmland management, a unanimous conclusion has not been reached.Based on the data of wheat farmers in Henan Province, this paper conducted an empirical analysis. The results showed that: (1) Outsourcing services promoted the withdrawal of smallholders from farmland management, mainly promoting the transfer of farmland rather than abandonment, and the impact on the withdrawal behavior of farmers below the mean size was more obvious. (2) Heterogeneity analysis did not change the main effect of outsourcing services on farmland management, and the development of factor market was also conducive to promoting farmland transfer and effectively inhibiting farmland abandonment. (3) Further analysis showed that the rising service prices promoted farmers’ withdrawal from farmland management, but the localization of outsourcing services slowed down the withdrawal from farmland management. The paper argued that we should pay attention to the double-edged sword function of outsourcing services, accelerate the development and matching of relevant factor markets, build agricultural machinery service information platform, and steadily promote the relevant system construction of small farmers’ land management withdrawal.

参考文献/References:

[1] 谢花林,黄萤乾.非农就业与土地流转对农户耕地撂荒行为的影响——以闽赣湘山区为例[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(2):408-423.
[2] 李升发,李秀彬,辛良杰,等.中国山区耕地撂荒程度及空间分布——基于全国山区抽样调查结果[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1801-1811.
[3] 张忠军,易中懿.农业生产性服务外包对水稻生产率的影响研究——基于358个农户的实证分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2015,36(10):69-76.
[4] 赵鑫,张正河,任金政. 农业生产性服务对农户收入有影响吗——基于800个行政村的倾向得分匹配模型实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(1):32-45.
[5] 卢华,陈仪静,胡浩,等.农业社会化服务能促进农户采用亲环境农业技术吗[J].农业技术经济,2021(3): 36-49.
[6] 罗必良.论服务规模经营——从纵向分工到横向分工及连片专业化[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(11):2-16.
[7] 周娟.土地流转背景下农业社会化服务体系的重构与小农的困境[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017,17(6):141-151.
[8] 陈义媛.土地托管的实践与组织困境:对农业社会化服务体系构建的思考[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017,17(6):120-130.
[9] 韩庆龄. 小农户经营与农业社会化服务的衔接困境——以山东省M县土地托管为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,19(2):20-27.
[10] 洪炜杰.外包服务市场的发育如何影响农地流转?——以水稻收割环节为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,19(4):95-105.
[11] 万晶晶,钟涨宝.非农就业、农业生产服务外包与农户农地流转行为[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020,29(10):2307-2322.
[12] 胡新艳,陈相泼,饶应巧. 农业服务外包如何影响农地流转?——来自河南麦区的分析[J]. 农村经济, 2021(9):44-52.
[13] 章丹,徐志刚,刘家成.外包与流转:作业服务规模化是否延缓农地经营规模化——基于要素约束缓解与地租上涨的视角[J].中国农村观察,2022(2):19-38.
[14] 罗必良,万燕兰,洪炜杰,等. 土地细碎化、服务外包与农地撂荒——基于9省区2704份农户问卷的实证分析[J]. 经济纵横, 2019(7):63-73.
[15] 陈超,唐若迪.水稻生产环节外包服务对农户土地转入的影响——基于农户规模分化的视角[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,20(5):156-166.
[16] 冯国强,李菁,孙瑞,等.村庄组织化程度能抑制农地抛荒行为吗?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(1):165-172.
[17] Qiu T W, Shi X J, He Q Y, et al. The Paradox of Developing Agricultural Mechanization Services in China: Supporting or Kicking out Smallholder Farmers?[J]. China Economic Review, 2021, 69:101680.
[18] 申红芳,陈超,廖西元,等. 稻农生产环节外包行为分析——基于7省21县的调查[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015(5):44-57.
[19] 李虹韦,钟涨宝.农户分化背景下农业生产社会化服务的供需失衡及其破解[J].农村经济,2021(6):112-119.
[20] 黄炎忠,罗小锋.跨区作业如何影响农户外包水平获取?[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(4):89-97.
[21] 方师乐,黄祖辉.新中国成立70年来我国农业机械化的阶段性演变与发展趋势[J].农业经济问题, 2019,40(10):36-49.
[22] Foster A D, Rosenzweig M R. Are there too Many Farms in the World? Labor-market Transaction Costs, Machine Capacities and Optimal Farm Size[R]. Journal of Political Economy,2022,130(3):636-680.
[23] 李宁,周琦宇,汪险生.新型农业经营主体的角色转变研究:以农机服务对农地经营规模的影响为切入点[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(7):40-58.
[24] 仇童伟, 何勤英, 罗必良. 谁更能从农机服务中获益——基于小麦产出率的分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2021(9):4-15.
[25] Qiu T, Choy S T B, Li Y, et al. Farmers’ Exit from Land Operation in Rural China: Does the Price of Agricultural Mechanization Services Matter?[J]. China & World Economy, 2021,29(2):99-122.
[26] Sheng Y, Ding J P, Huang J K. The Relationship between Farm Size and Productivity in Agriculture: Evidence from Maize Production in Northern China[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2019,101(3):790-806.

相似文献/References:

[1]吕晓,臧涛,张全景.土地政策的农户认知及其农地转出响应研究——基于山东省287份农户问卷调查的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(05):100.
　LV Xiao,ZANG Tao,ZHANG Quanjing.Farm Households’Cognition of Land Policy and Its Effect on Farmland Transfer:Based on the Investigation of 287 Farmer Households in Shandong Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(05):100.
[2]洪炜杰.外包服务市场的发育如何影响农地流转？——以水稻收割环节为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(04):95.
　HONG Weijie.How the Outsourcing Service Market Development Affects Land Transfer? Evidence from Rice Harvesting[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(05):95.
[3]周月书,汪曼.农地转出视角下农户生计模式与融资行为研究——基于湖南和四川两省20县的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(05):152.
　ZHOU Yueshu,WANG Man.Research on Farmers’ Livelihood Mode and Financing Behavior under the Farmland Outflow: Based on the Survey of 20 Counties in Hunan and Sichuan Provinces[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(05):152.
[4]牛坤在,许恒周,迟旭.农地确权和宗族网络对农地转出的影响:替代或互补[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(03):139.
　NIU Kunzai,XU Hengzhou,CHI Xu.Homestead Exit, Factor Allocation and Farmer’s Agricultural Production Efficiency[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(05):139.
[5]庄健,罗必良.务工距离如何影响农地撂荒——兼顾时间、性别和代际的差异性考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(05):112.
　ZHUANG Jian,LUO Biliang.How does Labor Distance Affect Farmland Abandonment: An Investigation in Consideration of the Differences of Time, Gender and Generation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(05):112.
[6]洪炜杰.自然禀赋与农地撂荒——基于对农户承包地规模的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(05):124.
　HONG Weijie.Initial Natural Endowment and Farmers’ Land Abandonment Behavior: Based on the Investigation of the Scale of Contracted Land[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(05):124.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-4-21;改回日期:。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目"生态振兴促进农民农村共同富裕的实现路径研究"(72141009)
作者简介:李尚蒲,女,华南农业大学国家农业制度与发展研究院副教授;张路瑶,女,华南农业大学国家农业制度与发展研究院硕士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01