[1]江光辉,胡浩.偏好异质性、农户参与式方案创设与养殖废弃物资源化利用——来自养殖户种养结合的选择实验[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(03):161-173.
　JIANG Guanghui,HU Hao.Heterogeneous Preferences, Farmers Participatory Schemes Design and Livestock Manure Recycling:A Choice Experiment from Swine Farmers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(03):161-173.
点击复制

偏好异质性、农户参与式方案创设与养殖废弃物资源化利用——来自养殖户种养结合的选择实验()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
24
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
161-173
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2024-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Heterogeneous Preferences, Farmers Participatory Schemes Design and Livestock Manure Recycling:A Choice Experiment from Swine Farmers
作者:
江光辉1;  胡浩2
1. 安徽财经大学 金融学院, 蚌埠 233030;
2. 南京农业大学 经济管理学院, 南京 210095
Author(s):
JIANG Guanghui1;  HU Hao2
关键词:
养殖废弃物资源化利用; 种养结合; 生态补偿; 偏好异质性; 离散选择实验
Keywords:
Livestock Manure Recycling; Crop-livestock Integration; Agri-environmental Scheme; Heterogeneous Preference; Discrete Choice Experiment
分类号:
F326.3
摘要:
生态补偿政策构成的农业环境方案对于废弃物资源化利用具有激励作用,但现行补偿政策方案可能存在推广瓶颈,突破瓶颈的关键在于了解农户的政策选择偏好。以养殖废弃物肥料化还田为例,通过选择实验法构建了由4个政策属性组合而成的备选政策情境,结合江苏省346户生猪养殖户实验数据,运用Mixed Logit模型检验了补偿政策的选择偏好及协同互补效应。结果表明:(1)养殖户对选择实验方案中的服务类、收入类和价格类补偿政策的偏好程度更高,而对于技术支持类补偿政策不具备明显偏好;(2)养殖户环保认知与风险特征是上述政策偏好异质性的重要来源,风险偏好型和环保认知水平高的养殖户对各类补偿政策方案的接受意愿更高;(3)技术支持、外包服务同收入类、价格类补偿政策之间呈现显著的互补性。根据"重视多元化补偿,强化正协同效应"原则,本文创设了针对养殖废弃物还田利用的推广方案,旨在优化和完善现行的生态补偿政策体系,打好相关政策措施的"组合拳"。
Abstract:
The agricultural environmental program, which includes ecological compensation policies, exerts an incentive effect on the utilization of waste resources. However, the existing compensation policy framework may have reached a promotional bottleneck, and the key to overcoming this obstacle lies in understanding farmers’ policy preferences. Using livestock manure recycled as fertilizer as a case study, an alternative policy scenario was developed using four policy attributes through a choice experiment method. The Mixed Logit model was applied to analyze the data from 346 swine farmers in Jiangsu Province, testing the preferences for compensation policies and their synergistic and complementary effects. The findings indicated that: (1) Farmers favored service, income, and price compensation policies in the experimental scheme, showing no clear preference for technical support compensation policies; (2) Farmers’ environmental awareness and risk characteristics significantly influenced their policy preferences, with those having a higher risk preference and environmental awareness being more receptive to various compensation policies and schemes; (3) There was a significant complementarity between technical support and service outsourcing, and income and price compensation policies. Drawing on the principle of "promoting diversified compensation and enhancing positive synergistic effects", this study proposes a plan for the recycling of aquaculture waste to fields, aimed at optimizing and improving the current ecological compensation policy system to create a cohesive set of policies and measures.

参考文献/References:

[1] 郭庆海.渐行渐远的农牧关系及其重构[J].中国农村经济,2021(9):22-35.
[2] 何可,张俊飚,张露,等.人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿——以农业废弃物资源化为例[J].管理世界,2015(5):75-88.
[3] Li Y, Sun Z G, Accatino F, et al. Comparing Specialised Crop and Integrated Crop-livestock Systems in China with a Multi-Criteria Approach Using the Emergy Method[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 314: 127974.
[4] Han Z, Han C, Shi Z Z, et al. Rebuilding the Crop-livestock Integration System in China—Based on the Perspective of Circular Economy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 393: 136347.
[5] Jin S Q, Zhang B, Wu B, et al. Decoupling Livestock and Crop Production at the Household Level in China[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4: 48-55.
[6] Feng D M, Mao K, Yang Y J, et al. Crop-livestock Integration for Sustainable Agriculture in China: The History of State Policy Goals, Reform Opportunities and Institutional Constraints[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(4): 518-529.
[7] 胡浩, 江光辉, 戈阳. 中国生猪养殖业高质量发展的现实需求、内涵特征与路径选择[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022, 43(12): 32-44.
[8] 王娜娜,王志刚,罗良国.技术偏好异质性、农户参与式方案创设与政策绿色转型[J].中国农村经济,2023(3):136-156.
[9] 罗小娟,冯淑怡,Reidsma P,等.基于农户生物-经济模型的农业与环境政策响应模拟——以太湖流域为例[J].中国农村经济,2013(11):72-85.
[10] 陈秋红,张宽.新中国70年畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用演进[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(6):166-176.
[11] Fan M, Chen L. Spatial Characteristics of Land Uses and Ecological Compensations Based on Payment for Ecosystem Services Model from 2000 to 2015 in Sichuan Province, China. [J]. Ecological Informatics,2019, 50: 162-183.
[12] Taylor B M, Van Grieken M. Local Institutions and Farmer Participation in Agri-environmental Schemes[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2015, 37: 10-19.
[13] 陈琦.水产绿色健康养殖行动:养殖户的选择偏好及其异质性来源——基于最优-最劣选择实验法的分析[J].农业技术经济,2023(5):64-79.
[14] 龚亚珍,韩炜,Michael Bennett,等.基于选择实验法的湿地保护区生态补偿政策研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(2):241-251.
[15] 徐涛,赵敏娟,乔丹,等.农户偏好与"两型技术"补贴政策设计[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(4):109-118.
[16] 俞振宁,谭永忠,茅铭芝,等.重金属污染耕地治理式休耕补偿政策:农户选择实验及影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(2):109-125.
[17] 谢文宝,刘国勇,陈彤.耕地质量保护补偿标准测算及方案设计:新疆例证[J].农村经济,2019(6):32-39.
[18] 潘丹. 基于农户偏好的牲畜粪便污染治理政策选择——以生猪养殖为例[J].中国农村观察, 2016(2): 68-83.
[19] 王悦,闫佳惠,张越杰.肉牛养殖废弃物资源化利用生态补偿偏好研究[J].农业技术经济,2024(2):96-109.
[20] 黄炜虹,齐振宏,邬兰娅,等.农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定:市场收益还是政策激励?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(8):69-77.
[21] 孔祥智, 方松海, 庞晓鹏, 等. 西部地区农户禀赋对农业技术采纳的影响分析[J]. 经济研究, 2004, 39(12): 85-95.
[22] 杨义风. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳行为及生态补偿激励机制研究——以东北黑土区为例[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2021.
[23] 王建华,钭露露,马玲.农户融入农业绿色生产转型的驱动机制分析——以农户农业废弃物资源化利用为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(5):165-177.
[24] 刘馨月,周力,应瑞瑶.耕地重金属污染治理生态补偿政策选择与组合研究[J].中国土地科学,2021,35(1):88-97.
[25] Sun J, Zhou L, Lei L. Can Money always Talk? Implication for Environmental Compensation by International Agribusiness[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 215: 1014-1024.
[26] McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2000, 15(5): 447-470.
[27] 王建华,钭露露,王缘.环境规制政策情境下农业市场化对畜禽养殖废弃物资源化处理行为的影响分析[J].中国农村经济,2022(1):93-111.
[28] Obubuafo J, Gillespie J, Paudel K, et al. Awareness of and Application to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program by Cow-calf Producers[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2008, 40(1): 357-368.
[29] Tanaka T, Camerer C F, Nguyen Q. Risk and Time Preferences: Linking Experimental and Household Survey Data from Vietnam[J]. American Economic Review, 2010, 100(1): 557-571.
[30] 张园园,陈秋红.生猪养殖主体对制度激励型碳减排政策的选择偏好——基于选择实验法的分析[J].农业技术经济,2021(10):107-120.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-11-04。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“超大规模人口国家农业农村现代化建设研究”(23&ZD109)；安徽省自然科学基金青年项目“面向广域种养结合的畜禽养殖废弃物循环利用行为与生态补偿机制研究”(2308085QG239)；安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“农户种养结合型低碳农业生产行为与生态补偿政策研究”(22AH050553)
作者简介:江光辉,男,安徽财经大学金融学院讲师;胡浩,男,南京农业大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01