[1]邱亚彪,王巨光,李睿.互动与重塑:乡村现代化转型的行动逻辑——基于广西S村的案例研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(04):24-38.
　QIU Yabiao,WANG Juguang,LI Rui.Interaction and Remodeling: The Action Logic of Rural Modernization and Transformation——A Case Study of S Village in Guangxi[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):24-38.
点击复制

互动与重塑:乡村现代化转型的行动逻辑——基于广西S村的案例研究()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
24
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
24-38
栏目:
乡村振兴的理论与实践
出版日期:
2024-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Interaction and Remodeling: The Action Logic of Rural Modernization and Transformation——A Case Study of S Village in Guangxi
作者:
邱亚彪1;  王巨光1;  李睿2
1. 广西大学 公共管理学院, 南宁 530004;
2. 厦门大学 管理学院, 厦门 361005
Author(s):
QIU Yabiao1;  WANG Juguang1;  LI Rui2
关键词:
乡村系统; 乡村振兴; 乡村现代化
Keywords:
Rural System; Rural Revitalization; Rural Modernization Transformation
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
实现农业农村现代化是全面建设社会主义现代化国家的重大任务。乡村融入开放市场的现代化转型是实现乡村振兴与现代化的关键路径之一,但实践中缺乏可行的行动逻辑和指导框架。本文从乡村系统理论视角出发,结合广西S村现代化转型实践案例,引入组织管理领域中的资源依赖理论,并将该理论修正为中国乡村现代化情境下的双向资源依赖理论,这为乡村现代化转型中乡村内外部系统互动的起底逻辑提供了一种解释。同时,结合复杂适应系统理论解构乡村系统在城乡互动中的演变机制,构建了“互动与重塑”乡村现代化转型的行动逻辑框架。乡村内外部系统互动,通过改变乡村系统外部环境的机制,促使其内部系统中农民主体性、资源与制度的适应性改变,进而推动乡村系统演变。乡村系统演变在乡村社会结构和经济结构重塑的过程中,以农民生活生产方式、社会交往方式、就业方式、消费观念、村庄归属感与身份认同感、对村级治理组织的态度转变为表征,最终实现乡村现代化转型的目标。这为乡村内外部系统互动、乡村系统演变与乡村现代化转型提供了完整的行动逻辑链条。
Abstract:
The modernization of agriculture and rural spaces constitutes a pivotal undertaking in the holistic construction of a modern socialist nation. The metamorphosis of villages towards integration with the open market is a crucial conduit toward the achievement of rural revitalization and modernity. However, the existing literature and practice herald a deficiency in a coherent action logic and a guiding framework for such transformations. Drawing from the tenets of rural systems theory, this scholarly inquiry adapts the resource dependence theory from the domain of organizational management. It interfaces this adaptation with the empirical case of S village in Guangxi’s trajectory of modernization to forge a bidirectional resource dependence theory that is contextualized within the paradigm of rural modernization in China. This modified theoretical framework elucidates the foundational interactional logic underpinning the modernization and transformation of the rural milieu, accounting for the dynamic interplay between its internal and external systems. In conjunction with the theory of complex adaptive systems, the study decomposes the systemic evolutionary mechanisms of the rural complex. It simultaneously constructs an action logic framework characterized by "interaction and remodeling" for the modernization transformation of rural spaces. This framework posits that the interactivity between the rural internal and external systems will instigate modifications within the system’s external environmental mechanisms. Consequently, these alterations will prompt adaptive shifts in the subjectivities of farmers, the deployment of resources, and the structuring of institutions within the rural internal system, thereby catalyzing the evolutionary trajectory of the rural system itself. The transformation of the rural system is marked by the reconfiguration of the social and economic architecture of the rural landscape, as well as by the adoption of market-oriented characteristics in the lifestyles and production methods of farmers, their social interactions, employment patterns, consumption behaviors, communal affiliations, and identities, and their perspectives on village governance structures. Ultimately, these changes signify the outcomes of the modernization process undergone by rural areas. This phenomenon delineates a comprehensive chain of action logic underpinning the interplay between the internal and external systems of the village, the systemic evolution of the village, and the transition towards the modernization of rural spaces.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈锡文.当前农业农村的若干重要问题[J].中国农村经济,2023(8):2-17.
[2] 杨锦秀,刘敏,尚凭,等. 如何破解乡村振兴的内外联动而内不动——基于成都市蒲江县箭塔村的实践考察[J]. 农业经济问题, 2023, 44(3): 51-61.
[3] 徐勇."政党下乡": 现代国家对乡土的整合[J]. 学术月刊, 2007, 39(8): 13-20.
[4] 文军,陈雪婧.国家介入与地方行动:乡村内生发展的张力及其化解[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(1):1-13.
[5] 刘祖云,刘传俊.后生产主义乡村:乡村振兴的一个理论视角[J].中国农村观察,2018(5):2-13.
[6] 苏毅清, 邱亚彪, 方平."外部激活+内部重塑"下的公共事物供给:关于激活乡村内生动力的机制解释[J].中国农村观察, 2023(2): 72-89.
[7] 于健慧.农民(村民)参与乡村治理的主体意识:基于利益相关者角度的分析[J]. 理论探讨, 2021(4): 91-96.
[8] Long H L, Qu Y. Land Use Transitions and Land Management: A Mutual Feedback Perspective[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74: 111-120.
[9] 潘加军. 非正式制度视域下的乡村环境治理路径创新[J]. 求索, 2021(5): 170-181.
[10] 刘守英,陈航.马克思主义乡村转型理论及其对中国的启示[J].中国农村观察,2023(3):2-24.
[11] 彭小兵, 彭洋."参与-反馈-响应" 行动逻辑下乡村振兴内生动力发展路径研究——以陕西省礼泉县袁家村为例[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2021, 20(3): 420-428.
[12] 刘彦随.中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.
[13] 狄金华.乡村巨变:社会转型还是国家转型?——从《乡土中国》到《新乡土中国》再到《乡村社会关键词》[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2011,11(3):138-142.
[14] 冯必扬.人情社会与契约社会——基于社会交换理论的视角[J].社会科学,2011(9):67-75.
[15] 贺雪峰.共同富裕与三轮驱动的中国式现代化[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(4): 1-7.
[16] 林星.乡村社会治理的现代化转型: 基于结构、方式、目标的分析[J]. 科学社会主义,2023(4):115-121.
[17] 杨慧,吕哲臻.现代化转型与在地化实践:乡村振兴背景下农村社会工作价值与伦理建设论析[J].思想战线,2023,49(3):102-110.
[18] Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1978:123-133.
[19] Hillman A J, Withers M C. Collins B J. Resource Dependence Theory: A Review[J].Journal of Management, 2009,35(6): 1404-1427.
[20] 马迎贤.资源依赖理论的发展和贡献评析[J].甘肃社会科学,2005(1):116-119.
[21] 马克思恩格斯文集:第7卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:372.
[22] 约翰·H.霍兰.隐秩序:适应性造就复杂性[M]. 周晓牧, 韩晖,译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2019:7-11.
[23] 范冬萍,何德贵.基于CAS理论的社会生态系统适应性治理进路分析[J].学术研究,2018(12):6-11.
[24] 张占录,卫思夷.引入土地发展权构建城乡统一建设用地市场框架——基于复杂适应系统理论[J].中国人民大学学报,2022, 36(6): 147-161.
[25] International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Inclusive Assessment of Rural Poverty: Asia and the Pacific[R]. Rome,2016:12.
[26] 王欣瑞."组织"和"人"的现代化——民国乡村建设运动关于乡村社会和文化现代化的理论探索[J].科学·经济·社会, 2010, 28(1): 123-127.
[27] 王露璐.中国式现代化进程中的乡村振兴与伦理重建[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(12): 89-109.
[28] 陆益龙,周磊刚.中国式乡村治理现代化的重要关系问题[J]. 社会科学研究, 2024(1): 1-9.
[29] 马克思恩格斯文集:第8卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:123.
[30] 钟曼丽,杨宝强.再造与重构:基于乡村价值与农民主体性的乡村振兴[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(6):1-9.
[31] 秦中春.乡村振兴背景下乡村治理的目标与实现途径[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(2): 1-6.
[32] 陈晓莉,吴海燕.增权赋能:乡村振兴战略中的农民主体性重塑[J].西安财经学院学报,2019,32(6): 26-33.
[33] 望超凡.村社统筹视域下的农民组织化与农业现代化转型——以陕西洪村为例[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2023,41(5):66-76.
[34] 贺雪峰.农民组织化与再造村社集体[J].开放时代,2019(3):186-196.
[35] 苏毅清,游玉婷,王志刚.农村一二三产业融合发展:理论探讨、现状分析与对策建议[J].中国软科学,2016(8):17-28.

相似文献/References:

[1]王景新,支晓娟.中国乡村振兴及其地域空间重构——特色小镇与美丽乡村同建振兴乡村的案例、经验及未来[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):17.
　WANG Jingxin,ZHI Xiaojuan.Rural Revitalization in China and its Regional Spatial Reconstruction: Case Study and Prospects of “Building up Characteristic Towns with Beautiful Countryside” to Revitalize Chinese Countryside[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):17.
[2]陈美球,廖彩荣,刘桃菊.乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):27.
　CHEN Meiqiu,LIAO Cairong,LIU Taoju.Rural Revitalization, Collective Economic Organization and Land Use System Innovation: Based on Analysis of Huangxi Village, Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):27.
[3]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):19.
　HE Xuefeng.Some Issues in Rural Thriving Strategy Implementation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):19.
[4]刘祖云,王丹.“乡村振兴”战略落地的技术支持[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):8.
　LIU Zuyun,WANG Dan.The Technical Support for Implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):8.
[5]张艺颉.乡村振兴背景下村民自治制度建设与转型路径研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):47.
　ZHANG Yijie.Villager Self-governance System Construction and Transformation Path under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):47.
[6]王肖芳.农民工返乡创业集群驱动乡村振兴:机理与策略[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):101.
　WANG Xiaofang.A Study of Migrant Workers Returning Home to Start Businesses Cluster Drive Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):101.
[7]张勇.农村宅基地制度改革的内在逻辑、现实困境与路径选择——基于农民市民化与乡村振兴协同视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):118.
　ZHANG Yong.The Internal Logic, Realistic Predicament and Path Choice of the Rural Homestead System Reform: Based on the Coordination Perspective of Peasant’s Citizenship and Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):118.
[8]叶敬忠,张明皓.“小农户”与“小农”之辩——基于“小农户”的生产力振兴和“小农”的生产关系振兴[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):1.
　YE Jingzhong,ZHANG Minghao.Differences Between Smallholders and Peasants: Smallholders Based Vitalization of Productive Forces and Peasants Based Vitalization of Productive Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):1.
[9]吴重庆,张慧鹏.小农与乡村振兴——现代农业产业分工体系中小农户的结构性困境与出路[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):13.
　WU Chongqing,ZHANG Huipeng.Small Farmers and Rural Revitalization: Structural Dilemma and Outlet of Small Farmers in Modern Agricultural Industry Division System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):13.
[10]杜园园.社会经济:发展农村新集体经济的可能路径——兼论珠江三角洲地区的农村股份合作经济[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(02):63.
　DU Yuanyuan.Social Economy: Possible Paths to Develop New Collective Economy in Rural Areas With a Discussion of the Rural Share Cooperation Economy in the Pearl River Delta Region[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):63.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-12-18。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“乡村振兴战略下滇桂黔地区农民发展能力提升路径与社会支持研究”(22AMZ004)
作者简介:邱亚彪,男,广西大学公共管理学院博士生;王巨光(通信作者),男,广西大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师;李睿,女,厦门大学管理学院博士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01