[1]郑佳鑫.村社统筹的土地细碎化治理:机制与效益——以安徽“小田变大田”为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(04):99-109.
 ZHENG Jiaxin.Fragmented Land Management Coordinated by Village Communities: Mechanism and Benefits——Taking “Small Fields Turning into Big Fields” in Anhui Province as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):99-109.
点击复制

村社统筹的土地细碎化治理:机制与效益——以安徽“小田变大田”为例()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
24
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
99-109
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2024-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Fragmented Land Management Coordinated by Village Communities: Mechanism and Benefits——Taking “Small Fields Turning into Big Fields” in Anhui Province as an Example
作者:
郑佳鑫
武汉大学 社会学院, 武汉 430072
Author(s):
ZHENG Jiaxin
关键词:
土地细碎化高标准农田建设村社统筹多元主体治理机制
Keywords:
Fragmentation of LandHigh-standard Farmland ConstructionOverall Planning of Villages and CommunitiesMultiple SubjectsGovernance Mechanism
分类号:
C912.82;F321.1
摘要:
单一的土地细碎化治理方式难以解决土地细碎化问题,结合高标准农田建设项目实现“小田并大田”的地方实践提供了治理机制融合的契机。实地调查发现,从村社统筹的视角出发,村社集体由于具有政经社合一的属性,在发挥自组织优势的基础上整合了行政机制和市场机制,是三位一体治理机制的承接载体。在具体实践中,村社集体能够实施土地整治项目、实现土地产权整合并有序流转土地经营权。统筹治理的机制在于村社集体通过整合地方政府的治理资源激活自组织,在发挥自组织动员能力的基础上改进行政机制的不足并降低市场主体的交易成本,使三种机制在实践中能够取长补短。村社统筹的土地细碎化治理有助于推动农业现代化转型以及提高乡村治理能力。因此,在土地细碎化治理的融合机制探索中,应充分重视村社集体在土地细碎化治理中的统筹功能,同时发挥政府的基础性作用和市场的资源配置作用。
Abstract:
The challenge of land fragmentation cannot be adequately addressed by a monolithic governance mechanism. However, the local initiative of "consolidating small plots into large plots" in conjunction with high-standard farmland construction projects offers an opportunity for the integration of governance mechanisms. Field research indicates that from the standpoint of village coordination, the village collective can amalgamate administrative and market mechanisms leveraging its self-organizational advantages, thereby serving as a carrier for a tripartite governance mechanism due to its amalgamation of political, economic, and social functions. In concrete terms, village collectives can execute land consolidation projects, resolve fragmentation of land property rights, and facilitate the orderly transfer of land management rights. The overarching governance mechanism operates by the village collective activating self-organization to integrate governance resources provided by local governments, thus compensating for the deficiencies of the administrative mechanism and reducing the transaction costs for market entities. This approach allows the three mechanisms to complement each other’s strengths and mitigate weaknesses in practical application. The comprehensive planning of land fragmentation management by village communities can catalyze the transition towards agricultural modernization and enhance rural governance capacities. Hence, in the quest to integrate mechanisms for governing land fragmentation, due regard should be given to the coordinating function of village collectives in land fragmentation governance, while simultaneously harnessing the foundational role of the government and the resource allocation function of the market.

参考文献/References:

[1] 吴海洋.农村土地整治:助推农业现代化[J].求是,2012(7):51-53.
[2] 苏旭霞,王秀清.农用地细碎化与农户粮食生产——以山东省莱西市为例的分析[J].中国农村观察,2002(3):22-28,80.
[3] 张红宇.中国农地调整与使用权流转:几点评论[J].管理世界,2002(5):76-87.
[4] 钱忠好.农村土地承包经营权产权残缺与市场流转困境:理论与政策分析[J].管理世界, 2002(6):35-45,154-155.
[5] 叶剑平,蒋妍,丰雷.中国农村土地流转市场的调查研究——基于2005年17省调查的分析和建议[J].中国农村观察,2006(4):48-55.
[6] 王兴稳,钟甫宁.土地细碎化与农用地流转市场[J].中国农村观察,2008(4):29-34,80.
[7] 陈江华,罗明忠,洪炜杰.农地确权、细碎化与农村劳动力非农转移[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(2):88-96.
[8] 吴海洋."十二五"时期中国土地整治工作思考[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(3):4-9.
[9] 杨昭熙,杨钢桥.农地细碎化对农户农地流转决策的影响研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(4):33-42.
[10] 吴次芳,费罗成,叶艳妹.土地整治发展的理论视野、理性范式和战略路径[J].经济地理,2011,31(10):1718-1722.
[11] 徐康,金晓斌,吴定国,等.基于农用地分等修正的土地整治项目耕地质量评价[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):247-255.
[12] 刘新卫,赵崔莉.农村土地整治的工程化及其成因[J].中国农村经济,2017(7):15-28.
[13] 于传岗.农村集体土地流转演化趋势分析——基于政府主导型流转模式的视角[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,13(5):10-21.
[14] 张一晗.村集体角色与土地流转秩序——两种组织化流转模式的比较[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(6):85-93.
[15] 王德福,桂华.大规模农地流转的经济与社会后果分析——基于皖南林村的考察[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2011,10(2):13-22.
[16] 桂华.项目制与农村公共品供给体制分析——以农地整治为例[J].政治学研究, 2014(4):50-62.
[17] 王海娟,胡守庚.自主治理:一种中国农地细碎化治理模式[J].中国土地科学,2019, 33(7):40-47.
[18] 孙新华,周佩萱,曾凡木.土地细碎化的自主治理机制——基于山东省W县的案例研究[J].农业经济问题,2020(9):122-131.
[19] 张蚌蚌,王数.群众自主式土地整治模式及其效应研究——以新疆玛纳斯县三岔坪村为例[J].经济地理,2013,33(5):131-136.
[20] 刘小红,陈兴雷,于冰.基于行为选择视角的农地细碎化治理比较分析——对安徽省"一户一块田"模式的考察[J].农村经济,2017(10):44-50.
[21] 魏程琳.土地细碎化治理与农地制度变革——基于桂北F县农村调研[J].北京社会科学,2015(5):90-97.
[22] 孙新华,宋梦霜.土地细碎化的治理机制及其融合[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(1):80-88.
[23] 梁伟.土地细碎化县域治理:体系构建与实践机制[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(2):36-45.
[24] 陈靖.村社理性:资本下乡与村庄发展——基于皖北T镇两个村庄的对比[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,30(3):31-39.
[25] 孙新华.村社主导、农民组织化与农业服务规模化——基于土地托管和联耕联种实践的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(6):131-140,166.
[26] 王海娟."三权分置"下土地整治的组织化路径[J].农村经济,2023(2):23-32.
[27] 高万芹.村社组织再造及其对集体产权制度改革的启示——基于广东Y市农村综合改革试验区的经验[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(2):11-21.
[28] 孙新华,柳泽凡,周佩萱."三权"分置中的地权整合与土地集中利用——以皖南河镇为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(1):2-12.
[29] 夏柱智.以地养老:应对农村人口老龄化的现实选择[J].南方人口,2018,33(5):63-71.
[30] 桂华.农村土地制度与村民自治的关联分析——兼论村级治理的经济基础[J].政治学研究,2017(1):99-110,128.
[31] 习近平.论"三农"工作[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2022:82-83.
[32] 孙新华.土地经营权整合与土地流转路径优化[J].经济学家,2023(3):120-128.

相似文献/References:

[1]夏柱智.虚拟确权:农地流转制度创新[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(06):89.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(04):89.
[2]展进涛,张燕媛,张忠军.土地细碎化是否阻碍了水稻生产性环节外包服务的发展?[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(02):117.
 ZHAN Jintao,ZHANG Yanyuan,ZHANG Zhongjun.Does Land Fragmentation Hinder the Implementation of Agricultural Production Links Outsourcing?[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):117.
[3]孙新华,柳泽凡,周佩萱.“三权”分置中的地权整合与土地集中利用——以皖南河镇为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(01):2.
 SUN Xinhua,LIU Zefan,ZHOU Peixuan.Land Rights Integration in the “Three Rights” Separation and Centralized Use of Land: Evidence from River Town in the South of Anhui Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(04):2.
[4]钱龙,杨光,钟钰.有土斯有粮:高标准农田建设提高了粮食单产吗?[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(01):132.
 QIAN Long,YANG Guang,ZHONG Yu.Land is the Mother of Grain: Does High-standard Farmland Construction Increase Grain Yield Per Unit Area?[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):132.
[5]孙学涛,张丽娟.高标准农田建设对农业技术进步偏向的影响[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(02):148.
 SUN Xuetao,ZHANG Lijuan.Influence of High Standard Farmland Construction on bias of Agricultural Technology Progress[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):148.
[6]张应良,龚燕玲.高标准农田建设参与对农民种粮收益的影响——基于农业新质生产力的中介作用[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(03):110.
 ZHANG Yingliang,GONG Yanling.Impact of High-standard Farmland Construction Participation on Farmer’s Grain Income: Based on the Intermediary Role of Agricultural New Quality Productive Forces[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):110.
[7]王术坤,林文声,杨国蕾.高标准农田建设的种植结构调整效应[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(03):125.
 WANG Shukun,LIN Wensheng,YANG Guolei.The Impact of Well-facilitated Farmland Construction on Adjustment of Grain Cropping Structure[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):125.
[8]王海娟.面向高标准农田建设的农地制度创新:小农户视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(04):89.
 WANG Haijuan.Innovations in Agricultural Land System Oriented to the High-standard Farmland Construction: Smallholder Perspectives[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):89.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-12-27。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“农业生产社会化服务与小农户的组织机制研究”(23BSH068)
作者简介:郑佳鑫,女,武汉大学社会学院博士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01