[1]杨美春,黄腾,刘天军.公共基础设施如何影响农地转入增收效应？——基于生产决策与市场接入视角的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(04):110-122.
　YANG Meichun,HUANG Teng,LIU Tianjun.How does Public Infrastructure Affect the Income-generating Effect of Agricultural Land Transfer?——Empirical Analysis Based on Production Decision and Market Access[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):110-122.
点击复制

公共基础设施如何影响农地转入增收效应？——基于生产决策与市场接入视角的实证分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
24
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
110-122
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2024-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
How does Public Infrastructure Affect the Income-generating Effect of Agricultural Land Transfer?——Empirical Analysis Based on Production Decision and Market Access
作者:
杨美春1;  黄腾2;  刘天军1
1. 西北农林科技大学 经济管理学院, 杨凌 712100;
2. 厦门大学 邹至庄经济研究院, 厦门 361005
Author(s):
YANG Meichun1;  HUANG Teng2;  LIU Tianjun1
关键词:
农地转入; 公共基础设施; 生产决策; 市场接入; 农业收入
Keywords:
Agricultural Land Transfer; Public Infrastructure; Production Decisions; Market Access; Farm Income
分类号:
F323.8
摘要:
基于陕川渝三省(市)的1436份农户调查数据,对公共基础设施与农户生产决策和市场接入的内在联系进行探讨,进一步厘清在不同公共基础设施水平下农地转入对农户农业收入的影响。结果表明,农地转入促进了家庭农业收入的增长,且生产性公共基础设施和交易效率公共基础设施均能增强农地转入的增收效应。机制分析发现,生产性基础设施通过影响要素投入和种植行为两方面的生产决策提高增收效应,具体包括种子、化肥和农业机械投入的提升,以及减少玉米、增加水稻种植的结构调整。交易效率基础设施尽管对农户的要素投入决策无影响,但能够优化其种植行为决策,表现为既提高种植类型调整频率和经济作物种植概率,又能提升农户的市场接入水平,主要是增强对粮价的关切及拓宽农业销售渠道。异质性分析表明,生产性基础设施强化青年农户与高学历农户的农地转入增收效应更为显著,而交易效率基础设施增强了传统小农和市场型农地转入的增收效应。因此,应进一步完善农村生产性与交易效率等公共基础设施的建设,以充分释放其在农地增收效应中发挥的重要促进作用。
Abstract:
Utilizing survey data from 1436 farm households across Shaanxi, Sichuan, and Chongqing, this study delves into the intrinsic connections between public infrastructure and farmers’ production decisions and market access, aiming to elucidate the impact of farmland transfers on farmers’ agricultural incomes against varying levels of public infrastructure. The findings indicate that farmland transfers facilitate an increase in household agricultural income, with both productively and transactionally efficient public infrastructure augmenting the income-boosting effects of such transfers. Mechanism analysis reveals that productive infrastructure amplifies the income effect by influencing production decisions related to both factor inputs and planting behavior, notably through increased inputs of seeds, fertilizers, and agricultural machinery, as well as structural adjustments such as reducing maize and increasing rice cultivation. Conversely, while transaction efficiency infrastructure does not impact farmers’ factor input decisions, it does optimize their planting behavior decisions, evident in the higher frequency of planting type adjustments and the increased likelihood of cash crop planting. Additionally, it aids in enhancing farmers’ market access levels, primarily by heightening their awareness of food prices and expanding agricultural marketing channels. Heterogeneity analysis suggests that productive infrastructure more significantly enhances the income effects of farmland transfers for younger and more educated farmers, whereas transaction efficiency infrastructure amplifies the income effects more for traditional smallholder and market-oriented farmland transfers. Consequently, the study underscores the necessity to further improve the construction of public infrastructure, such as productive and transaction efficiency facilities, in rural areas to fully harness its instrumental role in bolstering the income-generating impacts of farmland transfers.

参考文献/References:

[1] 向书坚, 郑瑞坤, 杨璐瑶. 城乡居民收入差距对城镇化影响的地区差异及动态演进[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(7): 47-68.
[2] 方达,郭研.农村土地流转、资本有机构成与城乡收入差距——基于马克思政治经济学的经验与实证证据[J].经济学家,2020(11):107-115.
[3] 冒佩华,徐骥.农地制度、土地经营权流转与农民收入增长[J].管理世界,2015(5):63-74.
[4] 盖庆恩, 李承政, 张无坷, 等. 从小农户经营到规模经营:土地流转与农业生产效率[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(5): 135-152.
[5] 杜鑫,张贵友.土地流转对农村居民收入分配的影响——基于2020年10省份农户调查数据的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2022(5):107-126.
[6] 许恒周,牛坤在,王大哲.农地确权的收入效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(10):165-173.
[7] 钱忠好.农村土地承包经营权产权残缺与市场流转困境:理论与政策分析[J].管理世界,2002(6):35-45.
[8] 张广辉,张建.农村土地流转对农户收入的影响:内在机理与实证检验[J].经济学家,2023(2):120-128.
[9] 骆永民,樊丽明.中国农村基础设施增收效应的空间特征——基于空间相关性和空间异质性的实证研究[J].管理世界,2012(5):71-87.
[10] 谢申祥,刘生龙,李强.基础设施的可获得性与农村减贫——来自中国微观数据的经验分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(5):112-131.
[11] 张文忠.经济区位论[M].科学出版社,1998.
[12] 骆永民,骆熙,汪卢俊.农村基础设施、工农业劳动生产率差距与非农就业[J].管理世界, 2020,36(12): 91-121.
[13] 张亦弛, 代瑞熙. 农村基础设施对农业经济增长的影响——基于全国省级面板数据的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(3): 90-99.
[14] 朱晶,晋乐.农业基础设施与粮食生产成本的关联度[J].改革,2016(11):74-84.
[15] 张建, 诸培新, 南光耀. 不同类型农地流转对农户农业生产长期投资影响研究——以江苏省四县为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(3): 96-104.
[16] 罗必良. 小农经营、功能转换与策略选择——兼论小农户与现代农业融合发展的"第三条道路"[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020, 41(1): 29-47.
[17] 朱文珏, 罗必良. 农地价格幻觉: 由价值评价差异引发的农地流转市场配置"失灵"——基于全国9省(区)农户的微观数据[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(5): 67-81.
[18] 戚渊, 朱道林, 程建, 等. 农地资本化困境:粮食增产与农户增收[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2023, 33(5): 201-212.
[19] Wu Q H, Guan X L, Zhang J, et al. The Role of Rural Infrastructure in Reducing Production Costs and Promoting Resource-conserving Agriculture[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(18): 3493.
[20] 刘同山,陈晓萱,周静.中国的农地流转:政策目标、面临挑战与改革思考[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(4):176-186.
[21] Rogowski J C, Gerring J, Maguire M, et al. Public Infrastructure and Economic Development: Evidence from Postal Systems[J]. American Journal of Political Science, 2022, 66(4): 885-901.
[22] Vivalt E. Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Impact Evaluation[J]. American Economic Review, 2015, 105(5): 467-470.
[23] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
[24] 陶旭辉, 郭峰. 异质性政策效应评估与机器学习方法:研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(11): 216-237.
[25] 苏毅清, 秦明, 王亚华. 劳动力外流背景下土地流转对农村集体行动能力的影响——基于社会生态系统(SES)框架的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(7): 185-198.
[26] 耿鹏鹏,罗必良.农地确权是否推进了乡村治理的现代化?[J].管理世界,2022,38(12):59-76.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-01-11。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目“我国西部农业市场培育与开放研究”(71933005)
作者简介:杨美春,女,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院博士生;黄腾,男,厦门大学邹至庄经济研究院博士生;刘天军(通信作者),男,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01