[1]赵新龙.集体成员诉权的组织法配置: 法理、实践和解释性构造[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(05):121-134.
　ZHAO Xinlong.Judicial Examination and Litigation Disposition of the Rules of Collective Members’ Right of Revocation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(05):121-134.
点击复制

集体成员诉权的组织法配置: 法理、实践和解释性构造()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
24
期数:
2024年05期
页码:
121-134
栏目:
农村集体经济组织法专题
出版日期:
2024-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Judicial Examination and Litigation Disposition of the Rules of Collective Members’ Right of Revocation
作者:
赵新龙
安徽财经大学 法学院, 蚌埠 233030
Author(s):
ZHAO Xinlong
关键词:
农村集体经济组织法; 集体成员诉权; 代表诉讼; 自益权诉讼; 共益权诉讼
Keywords:
Rural Collective Economic Organization Law; The Litigious Right of Collective Number; Representative Litigation; Self-interest Litigation; Shared Interest Litigation
分类号:
D922.4
摘要:
《农村集体经济组织法》从体系性视角初步构建集体成员诉权机制,但仍然存在粗疏遗漏和诉权克减现象。运用组织法逻辑配置集体成员诉权并构设诉讼规则,纵向维度上应当尊重其不同诉讼阶段动态递进的三阶构造,横向维度上适用以诉讼目的为依据划分形成的三种类型。《农村集体经济组织法》主要沿着以撤销权保护成员权益、以代表诉权保护组织权益、以行政行为监督决议合法性的进路展开,尚存撤销诉讼规则错裂、代表诉讼规则疏漏、决议纠纷可诉性不明的问题,在司法实践的具体适用仍有极大解释空间。应结合集体成员诉权原理构设侵权诉讼、代表诉讼和决议诉讼,通过出台司法解释或法官采取扩张性解释拓展细化具体规则。
Abstract:
The Rural Collective Economic Organization Law has initially established a litigation rights mechanism for collective members from a systemic perspective, yet there remain issues of incomplete and diminished litigation rights. By employing organizational logic, the law allocates litigation rights to collective members and establishes corresponding litigation rules. Vertically, the law should acknowledge the dynamic and progressive three-tier structure at different stages of litigation; horizontally, it should apply the three types of litigation formed based on the purpose of the action. The Rural Collective Economic Organization Law has evolved along a path that protects members’ rights and interests through the right of cancellation, safeguards the interests of organizations with the right of representative litigation, and upholds the legitimacy of resolutions through administrative remedies. However, there are still challenges such as the fragmented right of cancellation, oversights in the rules of representative litigation, and ambiguity regarding the justiciability of resolution disputes, leaving considerable room for interpretation in judicial practice. Representative litigation, tort litigation, and resolution litigation should be established in accordance with the principle of collective members’ right to action. The rules governing these should be expanded and refined through the issuance of judicial interpretations or by judges adopting an expansive interpretation approach.

参考文献/References:

[1] 管洪彦.农村集体经济组织法人治理机制立法建构的基本思路[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(1):51-60.
[2] 梁君瑜.行政诉权本质之辨:学术史梳理、观念重构与逻辑证成[J].政治与法律,2017(11):77-89.
[3] 孙森焱.论诉权学说及其实用[M]//民事诉讼法论文选辑:下册.台北:五南图书出版公司,1984:56.
[4] 任重.赫尔维格的法律保护请求权[M]//民事程序法研究:第16辑.厦门:厦门大学出版社,2016:108.
[5] 陈荣宗,林庆苗.民事诉讼法:上册[M]//台北:三民书局股份有限公司,2013:81.
[6] 王甲乙,杨建华,郑健才.民事诉讼法新论[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,1984:497.
[7] 戴锐.民事诉权学说探析[J].国家检察官学院学报,2008(2):137-143.
[8] 中村英郎.新民事诉讼法讲义[M].陈刚,林剑锋,郭美松,译.北京:法律出版社,2001:152.
[9] 江伟,单国军.关于诉权的若干问题的研究[M]//诉讼法论丛:第1卷.北京:法律出版社,1998:215-216.
[10] 江必新,梁凤云.最高人民法院新行政诉讼法司法解释理解与适用[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2015:8.
[11] 相庆梅.民事诉权论[D].北京:中国政法大学,2006:63.
[12] 汤维建.当事人适格的现代化转型[J].法治现代化研究,2022(3):18-34.
[13] 梁君瑜."诉权层次论"视域下的行政诉权要件探析[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):129-136.
[14] Hornstein G D.The Death Knell of Stockholders Derivative Suits in New York[J].California Law Review,1944(2):144.
[15] 韩松.论农民集体土地所有权的集体成员受益权能[J].当代法学,2014(1):50-57.
[16] 王雷.农民集体成员权、农民集体决议与乡村治理体系的健全[J].中国法学,2019(2):128-147.
[17] 薛刚凌.行政公益诉讼类型化发展研究[J].国家检察官学院学报,2021(2):81-99.
[18] 孟勤国. 物权法如何保护集体财产[J].法学,2006(1):73-77.
[19] 王利明,周友军.论我国农村土地权利制度的完善[J].中国法学,2012(1):45-54.
[20] 王杏飞.对我国民事诉判关系的再思考[J].中国法学,2019(2):279-302.
[21] 杨仁寿.法学方法论[M].北京:法律出版社,1999:72.
[22] 赵新龙.农村集体成员代表诉讼的法理逻辑与制度构造[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):90-100.
[23] 徐银波.决议行为效力规则之构造[J].法学研究,2015(4):164-183.
[24] 赵新龙.农村集体经济组织章程的法律性质及其效力认定[J].农业经济问题,2018(7):57-69.
[25] 丁文,陈源媛.乡村治理共同体视角下农民集体决议法治化的双重样态与实现路径[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(1):141-152.
[26] 殷秋实.公司决议无效制度的类型区分与漏洞填补[J].法学,2024(3):107-122.

相似文献/References:

[1]房绍坤,袁晓燕.关于制定农村集体经济组织法的几点思考[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(01):70.
　FANG Shaokun,YUAN Xiaoyan.Reflections on the Formulation of the Rural Collective Economic Organization Law[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(05):70.
[2]宋天骐.论农村集体收益分配的法律逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(05):135.
　SONG Tianqi.On the Legal Logic of the Distribution of Rural Collective Income[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(05):135.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-4-23。
基金项目:安徽高校人文社会科学研究重大项目“‘三治融合’背景下农村集体经济组织法人治理机制的立法建构研究”(SK2021ZD0042);国家社会科学基金项目“股份化改革后农村集体经济组织治理机制的法律构造研究”(22BFX076)
作者简介:赵新龙,男,安徽财经大学法学院教授,法学博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01