[1]黄炳凯,耿献辉.补贴和环境规制提高生猪供给稳定性了吗？——基于规模经济和成本效率视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2026,26(01):167-180.
　HUANG Bingkai,GENG Xianhui.Has Subsidy and Environmental Regulation Improved the Stability of Hog Supply?——From the Perspective of Economies of Scale and Cost Efficiency[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2026,26(01):167-180.
点击复制

补贴和环境规制提高生猪供给稳定性了吗？——基于规模经济和成本效率视角()

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2026年01期
页码:
167-180
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2026-01-27

文章信息/Info

Title:
Has Subsidy and Environmental Regulation Improved the Stability of Hog Supply?——From the Perspective of Economies of Scale and Cost Efficiency
作者:
黄炳凯1;  耿献辉2
1. 山东财经大学 国际经贸学院, 济南 250014;
2. 南京农业大学 经济管理学院, 南京 210095
Author(s):
HUANG Bingkai1;  GENG Xianhui2
关键词:
补贴; 环境规制; 生猪供给; 稳定性; 规模经济
Keywords:
Subsidies; Environmental Regulations; Hog Supply; Stability; Economies of Scale
分类号:
F326
摘要:
基于面板数据,分析补贴和环境规制在提升生猪供给稳定性方面的作用机制,探讨其在规模经济和成本效率视角下的政策效果。研究发现,生猪补贴和环境规制强度提升都能对生猪供给稳定性产生显著正向影响,并且补贴的作用要优于环境规制。在分别考虑规模经济和成本效率后,补贴强度提升仍然对生猪供给稳定性具有显著正向影响,而环境规制对生猪供给稳定性的影响不显著。此外,补贴强度提升会降低成本效率,环境规制强度提升则有助于解决生猪养殖规模不经济的问题。因此生猪补贴政策和环境规制政策各有优劣,不能急于否定任何一项政策的价值,在政策实施过程中,两种政策要相互配合,把握好政策实施的强度,稳步推进生猪产业的健康发展。
Abstract:
This article analyzed the mechanism of subsidies and environmental regulations in improving the stability of hog supply based on panel data, and explored their policy effects from the perspectives of economies of scale and cost efficiency. Research had found that the increase in the intensity of hog subsidies and environmental regulations can have a significant positive impact on the stability of pig supply, and the role of subsidies was superior to that of environmental regulations. After considering economies of scale and cost efficiency separately, the increase in subsidy intensity still had a significant positive impact on the stability of hog supply, while the impact of environmental regulations on hog supply stability was not significant. In addition, increasing subsidy intensity will reduce cost efficiency and be detrimental to the stability of pig supply, while increasing environmental regulation intensity will help solve the problem of diseconomies in hog farming scale and significantly improve the stability of pig supply. Therefore, the hog subsidy policy and environmental regulation policy each had their own advantages and disadvantages, and we cannot rush to deny the value of either policy. In the process of policy implementation, the two policies should cooperate with each other. We should grasp the intensity of policy implementation and steadily promote the healthy development of the pig industry.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨少华,王凯.规模经营对中国生猪生产波动的稳定效应研究——基于调节效应和门槛效应模型的双重检验[J].农业经济问题,2022(7):81-96.
[2] 胡向东,石自忠,张合成.中国生猪市场调控政策:历史演变与未来选择[J].农业经济问题,2022(4):4-14.
[3] 周晶,陈玉萍,丁士军."一揽子"补贴政策对中国生猪养殖规模化进程的影响——基于双重差分方法的估计[J].中国农村经济,2015(4):29-43.
[4] 王刚毅,贾亦蕾,申玉琢.生猪良种补贴政策缓解了生猪种业"卡脖子"问题吗?——基于良种化水平视角[J].农业现代化研究,2025(2):248-259.
[5] 谭永风,徐戈,陆迁."一揽子"补贴促进规模养殖户环境污染治理了吗?——以畜禽粪污资源化利用为例[J].农村经济,2022(2):62-71.
[6] 曾昉,李大胜,谭莹.环境规制背景下生猪产业转移对农业结构调整的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021(6):158-166.
[7] 黄伟华,祁春节,杨朦.环境分权与生猪养殖业生态效率:影响机制与实证检验[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024(4):81-94.
[8] 朱润,何可,张俊飚.环境规制如何影响规模养猪户的生猪粪便资源化利用决策——基于规模养猪户感知视角[J].中国农村观察,2021(6):85-107.
[9] 邹锦鹏,唐宏,王欢,等.环境规制对农户环境设备追加投入行为的影响研究——基于782份四川省畜禽养殖场(户)调研问卷的实证分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2025(3):10-23.
[10] 江艳军,杨少华,王凯,等.环境规制、环境分权与生猪养殖规模化程度[J].农业技术经济,2023(12):78-95.
[11] 张士云,江惠,佟大建,等.环境规制、地区间策略互动对生猪生产发展的影响——基于空间计量模型的实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021(6):167-176.
[12] 黄炳凯,耿献辉,胡浩.中国生猪养殖规模结构变动是产业政策造成的吗？——基于马尔可夫链的实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2021(4):123-144.
[13] 李晗,赵敏娟,陆迁.畜禽禁养区政策降低了中国生猪产能吗——基于县域面板数据的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2021(8):12-27.
[14] 王长琴,周德.补贴政策与生猪平稳供给的灰色关联分析[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2019(16):20-23.
[15] Roe B,Irwin E G,Sharp J S. Pigs in Space: Modeling the Spatial Structure of Hog Production in Traditional and Nontraditional Production Regions[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2002(2): 259-278.
[16] 高雪莲,李阳阳.农业跑步机理论:研究述评与中国实践[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(2):35-43.
[17] Briguglio L, Cordina G, Farrugia N, et al. Economic Vulnerability and Resilience:Concepts and Measurements[J]. Oxford Development Studies, 2009(3):229-247.
[18] Ibarrarán M E, Malone E L, Brenkert A L. Climate Change Vulnerability and Resilience: Current Status and Trendsfor Mexico[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2010, 12:365-388.
[19] Di-Pietro F, Lecca P, Salotti S. Regional Economic Resilience in the European Union:A Numerical General Equilibrium Analysis[J]. Spatial Economic Analysis,2021(3):287-312.
[20] 刘晓星,张旭,李守伟.中国宏观经济韧性测度——基于系统性风险的视角[J].中国社会科学,2021(1):12-32.
[21] 郝爱民,谭家银.农村产业融合赋能农业韧性的机理及效应测度[J].农业技术经济,2023(7):88-107.
[22] 何小钢, 张宁. 中国经济增长转型动力之谜:技术、效率还是要素成本[J]. 世界经济, 2015(1): 25-52.
[23] Battese G E, Coelli T J. Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,1992(1):153-169.
[24] 王瑞峰,李爽.环境规制能否促进乡村产业高质量发展——基于动态演进视角的探讨[J].农业经济与管理,2025(5):104-116.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁洁,史安娜,马轶群.环境规制与中国宏观经济——基于动态随机一般均衡模型的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(02):93.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(01):93.
[2]葛继红,郑智聪,周曙东.中国农村化学品企业发展存在“污染天堂效应”吗?[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):128.
　GE Jihong,ZHENG Zhicong,ZHOU Shudong.Was There Pollution Heaven Effect in the Development of China’s Rural Chemical Enterprises?[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):128.
[3]朱战国,张彤.三重冲击下农业企业如何实现供应链韧性提升?——以温氏为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(05):178.
　ZHU Zhanguo,ZHANG Tong.Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience in Agricultural Enterprises under Triple Impacts: A Case Study of Wens[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(01):178.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-11-27。
基金项目:山东省人文社会科学课题一般项目"山东完善粮食和重要农产品生产的政策支持体系研究"
作者简介:黄炳凯,男,山东财经大学国际经贸学院讲师,博士;耿献辉(通信作者),男,南京农业大学经济管理学院教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01