[1]蔡荣.管护效果及投资意愿:小型农田水利设施合作供给困境分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(04):78-86.
点击复制

管护效果及投资意愿:小型农田水利设施合作供给困境分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
15
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
78-86
栏目:
农村公共产品供给
出版日期:
2015-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Maintaining Effect and Funding Willingness: Empirical Analysis on Collective Supply Willingness of Farmland Irrigation Canals in Rural Community
作者:
蔡荣
南京财经大学 粮食安全与战略研究中心, 江苏 南京 210003
关键词:
小型农田水利; 合作供给; 集体行动; 投资意愿
分类号:
F303.1
摘要:
作为农村地区最基础的生产性准公共物品,小型农田水利设施对稳定农业生产和确保国家粮食安全具有重要意义。本文以粮食主产区农田共用输水渠道为分析对象,利用实地调查数据和Logistic回归方法对小型农田水利设施合作供给困境进行了实证分析。研究表明:当前,小型农田水利设施管护效果整体较差,并且仅有不足40%的农户愿意参与小型农田水利设施的建设和维护,绝大多数并不具有任何形式的投资意愿;在稻作面积占耕地面积比例高和拥有较高社会资本的用户群体,小型农田水利设施管护效果相对较好;户主年龄大、受教育程度高、非耕作收入占比高、粮食售价落差大的农户对小型农田水利设施的投资意愿较低,而灌溉地块规模大、距河道距离远的农户对小型农田水利设施的投资意愿则较高。本文分析结论蕴含几点政策启示:一是鼓励地块相邻的农户在小范围内实行联合灌溉;二是加快耕地流转进程以促进种粮大户发展;三是重视农村地区社会资本的培育;四是加快培育新型职业农民来缓解劳动力老龄化困境;五是进一步规范粮食收购市场秩序,切实执行最低收购价政策。
Abstract:
As the basic production sub-public goods in rural communities, farmland irrigation canal is important for agricultural production and food security. Based on the survey data of rice farmers who share irrigation canals in major field crop production areas, this paper analyzed farmers’ willingness for irrigation canal management and its’ influence factors in the difficult supply situation with the help of field survey data and Logistic Regression Model. This survey found that the overall maintaining effect of small-size irrigation facilities was poor, and the proportion of respondents that had the willingness for farmland irrigation canal construction and maintaining is only 40%, and most of the respondents did not have any form of willingness to participate in this collective action. The maintaining effect of small size irrigation facilities was better among the user community with higher proportion of rice farming areas and those with high social capitals. The funding willingness was low among the user community of old-aged, higher education background, higher nonfarming income rate, and higher drop of food selling price, while the funding willingness was high among the user community with larger irrigation fields and bigger distance from canals or rivers. The analysis and conclusion of this paper contained several policy-making implications, the first is to encourage farming households with their fields next to each other to cooperate in irrigation within small scale, the second is to speed up farmland transfer process to boost the development of large-scale farming, the third is to cultivate the social capital in rural areas, the fourth is to train new-type professional farmers to alleviate the aging problems of rural labor, and the last one is to standardize the grain acquisition market order and ensure that the lowest purchasing price policy is in place.

参考文献/References:

[1] 巩前文, 郭丽楠. 中国西南地区水荒是"天灾"还是"人祸"[J]. 中国软科学, 2011(9): 108-121.
[2] 朱红根, 翁贞林, 康兰媛. 农户参与农田水利建设意愿影响因素的理论与实证分析——基于江西省619户种粮大户的微观调查证据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010(4): 539-546.
[3] 刘辉, 陈思羽. 农户参与小型农田水利建设意愿影响因素的实证分析——基于湖南省粮食主产区475户农户的调查[J]. 中国农村观察, 2012 (2): 54-66.
[4] 王昕, 陆迁. 农村社区小型水利设施合作供给意愿的实证[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012 (6): 115-119.
[5] 刘彬彬, 陆迁. 农村社区小型水利设施合作供给意愿及其影响因素分析——以陕西省泾阳县为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(6): 1159-1166.
[6] 蔡荣, 蔡书凯. 农田灌溉设施建设的农户参与意愿及其影响因素——以安徽省740户稻农为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013(8): 1661-1667.
[7] 夏莲, 石晓平, 冯淑怡, 曲福田. 涉农企业介入对农户参与小型农田水利设施投资的影响分析——以甘肃省民乐县研究为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报:社会科学版, 2013, 13(4): 54-60.
[8] 徐慧, 黄贤金. 土地利用政策与盐碱地农田水利设施管理农户参与意愿研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014(3): 154-160.
[9] Ostrom E. Governing the Commons[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[10] Poteete A, Ostrom E. Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management [J]. Development and Change, 2004, 35(3): 435-461.
[11] 黎红梅, 李明贤. 集体水管理对农户水稻生产技术效率的影响研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2009(3): 27-37.
[12] Ito J. Collective Action for Local Commons Management in Rural Yunnan, China: Empirical Evidence and Hypotheses Using Evolutionary Game Theory [J]. Land Economics, 2012, 88(1): 181-200.
[13] Naidu S. Heterogeneity and Collective Management: Evidence from Common Forests in Himachal Pradesh, India[J]. World Development, 2009, 37(3): 676-686.
[14] Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.
[15] Bardhan P. Irrigation and Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of 48 Irrigation Communities in South India[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2000, 48(4), 847-65.
[16] Araral J R. What Explains Collective Action in the Commons? Theory and Evidence from the Philippines[J]. World Development, 2009, 37(3): 687-697.
[17] Baland J, Platteau J. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[18] Kajisa K,Palanisami K, Sakurai T. Effects on Poverty and Equity of the Decline in Collective Tank Irrigation Management in Tamil Nadu, India[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2007, 36(1): 347-363.
[19] Kumar D, Palanisami K. An Economic Inquiry into Collective Action and Household Behavior in Watershed Management[J]. India Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009, 64(1): 108-122.
[20] 刘力, 谭向勇. 粮食主产区县乡政府及农户对小型农田水利设施建设的投资意愿分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2006 (12): 32-36.
[21] Baland J, Platteau J. The Ambiguous Impact of Inequality on Local Resource Management[J]. World Development, 1999, 27(35): 773-788.
[22] Yuko N, Keijiro O. Determinants of Household Contributions to Collective Irrigation Management: A Case of The Doho rice scheme in Uganda[C]. Contributed Paper presented at the Joint 3rd AAAE and 48th AEASA Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, 2010.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-12-8;改回日期:。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目"农业企业与合作农户间的治理机制与交易绩效研究"(71203088)
作者简介:蔡荣,男,南京财经大学粮食安全与战略研究中心副教授,博士,主要研究方向为农业经济与农村发展。E-mail:xiaopg918@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01