[1]张梦琳.农村宅基地流转前后农户福利差异及其影响因素分析——以河南四市为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(02):92-101.
　ZHANG Menglin.Analysis on Farmers’ Welfare Differences and Their Influential Factors After Rural Residential Land Transfer: With Four Cities of Henan Province as Case Study[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(02):92-101.
点击复制

农村宅基地流转前后农户福利差异及其影响因素分析——以河南四市为例()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
92-101
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2017-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on Farmers’ Welfare Differences and Their Influential Factors After Rural Residential Land Transfer: With Four Cities of Henan Province as Case Study
作者:
张梦琳
河南理工大学 测绘与国土信息工程学院/土地经济与区域可持续发展研究中心, 河南 焦作 454000
Author(s):
ZHANG Menglin
关键词:
宅基地流转; 农户福利差异; 影响因素; 分位数回归
分类号:
F301
摘要:
在理论分析的基础上，对河南省4市宅基地流转农户进行实证研究，分析宅基地流转前后农户福利变化情况及农户之间福利差异，并运用分位数回归模型实证检验引起农户福利变化差异的影响因素。研究结果表明，宅基地流转后农户福利水平下降，且农户间福利差距加大。受教育水平、非农就业、参加社保、宅基地使用权证书、参与流转意愿以及整体满意度对农户福利变化具有显著的正向影响。分阶段分析发现，受教育水平对农户福利变化的影响在高分位点上不如低分位点上更为有力，非农就业对农户福利变化的影响整体呈现上升趋势，农村社保、宅基地使用权证书分位数回归系数值变化趋势分别是先减少后增加，先增加后减少，参与流转意愿对中低分位数上农户福利变化影响的边际效应较大。因此，在加快宅基地确权登记发证、加大农村社会保障支持力度和教育投入、实施非农就业指导培训、尊重农户流转意愿和提升农户对宅基地流转的整体满意度的基础上，对流转后福利变差的农户应给予更多的关注，增加其职业技能培训和受教育的机会，这对增加农户福利水平，缩减农户间福利差距具有重要意义。
Abstract:
Based on theoretical analysis, anempirical study was conducted on farmers of residential land transfer in some cities of Henan Province, this paper analyzed peasants’ welfare changes and welfare differences among farmers, and examined their influence factors of farmers welfare change differences by Quantile Regression Model. The results showed that the farmer’ welfare level decreased, while welfare differences among farmers increased. Farmers’ education level, non-agricultural employment, social security, residential land use certificate, participation willingness and overall satisfaction had significant positive impact on farmers’ welfare changes. Meanwhile, quantile regression analysis provided more reliable and more detailed information:Educational level had more effect on farmers’ welfare changes with lower quantile relative to higher quantile, non-agricultural employment had increasing effect on farmers’ welfare changes from the overall trend, the effect of rural social security had gone through a decreasing phase and then an increasing phase; the quantile regression coefficient of residential land usecertificate had opposite trend, and participation willingness had larger marginal effect on the middle-low quantile of farmers’ welfare changes.Therefore, we should accelerate residential land registration certification, increase rural social security support and education funds, implement non-agricultural employment guidance and training, respect farmers’ willingness and enhance the overall satisfaction of farmers on residential land transfer. Based on the above efforts, the farmers of worse welfare changes after transfer should be given more attention, to increase their professional skill training and education opportunities. All these measures are very important for increasing farmers welfare and reducing welfare difference among farmers.

参考文献/References:

[1] 关江华,黄朝禧,胡银根.不同生计资产配置的农户宅基地流转家庭福利变化研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(10):135-142.
[2] 龙开胜,刘澄宇,陈利根.农民接受闲置宅基地治理方式的意愿及影响因素[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(9):83-89.
[3] 郭贯成,李金景.经济欠发达地区农村宅基地流转的地域差异研究——以河北省张家口市为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(6):1229-1234.
[4] 黄文秀,杨卫忠,钱方明.农户"就地城镇化"选择的影响因素研究[J].浙江社会科学,2015(1):86-92.
[5] 吕军书,张文赟.农村宅基地使用权流转的风险防范问题分析[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,40(2):102-105.
[6] 关江华. 基于风险能力评价的农户宅基地流转福利变化研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2014.
[7] 张梦琳.农村宅基地流转模式分析与制度选择[J].经济体制改革,2014(3):85-89.
[8] 陈利根,成程.基于农民福利的宅基地流转模式比较与路径选择[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(10):67-74.
[9] 王丹秋,廖成泉,胡银根,等.微观福利视角下农户宅基地置换意愿及其驱动因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(11):40-47.
[10] 胡方芳,蒲春玲,马贤磊.欠发达地区农民宅基地流转意愿影响因素[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(4):116-126.
[11] 杨玉珍.农户缘何不愿意进行宅基地的有偿腾退[J].经济学家,2015(5):68-77.
[12] 陈小君, 蒋省三. 宅基地使用权制度:规范解析、实践挑战及其立法回应[J].管理世界,2010(10):1-12.
[13] 李文谦,董祚继.质疑限制农村宅基地流转的正当性[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(3):56-59.
[14] 陈利根,王琴,龙开胜.农民宅基地福利水平影响因素的理论分析[J].农村经济,2011(12):13-16.
[15] 阿玛蒂亚森.以自由看待世界[M].任姬,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[16] 高进云,乔荣锋.农地城市流转前后农户福利变化差异分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(1):99-105.
[17] 贾燕,李钢,朱新华.农民集中居住前后福利状况变化研究[J].农业经济问题,2009(2):30-36.
[18] 马贤磊,孙晓中.不同经济发展水平下农民集中居住前后的福利变化研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(2):8-15.
[19] 伽红凯,王树进.集中居住前后农户的福利变化及其影响因素分析[J].中国农村观察,2014(1):26-39.
[20] 赵京,杨钢桥,徐玉婷.湖北省农地整理对农户福利的影响研究[J].资源科学,2014,36(3):446-453.
[21] Cheli B.Totally Fuzzy and Relative Measures of Poverty in Dynamic Context:An Application to the British Household Panel Survey, 1991-1992[J]. Metron,1995,53(3):83-205.
[22] 高鸿业.西方经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.
[23] 孟凡强,邓保国.劳动力市场户籍歧视与城乡工资差异[J].中国农村经济,2014(6):56-64.
[24] 易丹辉.数据分析与EViews应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.

相似文献/References:

[1]彭长生,王全忠,钟钰.确权、农民分化与宅基地处置意愿——基于安徽、湖南两省农户调查数据的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(05):118.
　PENG Changsheng,WANG Quanzhong,ZHONG Yu.Rural Land Right Confirmation, Farmers’ Differentiation and Willingness of Homestead Disposal: An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey Data of Anhui and Hunan Provinces[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(02):118.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-10-17
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“农村宅基地流转：模式、效应与管理政策”（13YJCZH249）；河南省高等学校哲学社会科学创新团队支持计划（2016-CXTD-04）；江苏省社会科学基金项目“集体建设用地流转收益分配机制研究”（14GLC005）
作者简介:张梦琳,女,河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院讲师,博士后。E-mail:zmllxb@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01