[1]赵微,杨钢桥,江颖慧.公共部门绩效管理视角下农地整理管护绩效的影响因素研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):119-127.
 ZHAO Wei,YANG Gangqiao,JIANG Yinghui.Impact Factors Analysis of Performance of Supervision and Maintenance of Rural Land Consolidation Based on Performance Management of Public Sector[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):119-127.
点击复制

公共部门绩效管理视角下农地整理管护绩效的影响因素研究()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
119-127
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2017-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact Factors Analysis of Performance of Supervision and Maintenance of Rural Land Consolidation Based on Performance Management of Public Sector
作者:
赵微 杨钢桥 江颖慧
华中农业大学 公共管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430070
Author(s):
ZHAO Wei YANG Gangqiao JIANG Yinghui
关键词:
农地整理管护绩效绩效棱柱模型增强回归树
分类号:
F301.2
摘要:
论文从公共部门绩效管理的视角出发,基于改进的绩效棱柱模型开展农地整理管护绩效研究,运用有序Logistic回归模型和增强回归树模型,揭示农地整理管护绩效的影响因素并探讨其提升机制。实证地区的研究结果表明:(1)有序Logistic回归模型中管护制度类变量、管护流程类变量、管护投入类变量、管护措施类变量及农民满意类变量的回归系数均通过显著度水平检验;(2)有序Logistic回归模型和增强回归树模型中影响因素对管护绩效的贡献度排序基本一致,依次为农民满意类变量、管护制度类变量、管护流程类变量、管护措施类变量、管护投入类变量。基于理论和实证研究结果,建议既要鼓励利益相关者对管护工作的贡献,也要承认利益相关者满意程度的重要性,同时还要统筹制度安排、流程设置、管护投入等关键要素以提升管护绩效。
Abstract:
This paper is aiming to reveal the significant impact factors and the improvement approach of supervision and maintenance performance of rural land consolidation, from the viewpoint of performance management of public sectors. In order to gain that goal,a performance prism model has been adopted to analyze the theoretical cause and effect and explore the key impact factors. Thereafter, Ordered Logistic Regression Model and Boost Regression Tree Model have been successively employed to examine the surveyed data. The results show that in Ordered Logistic Regression Model, the regression coefficients of the different variables—institution dimensionality, flow-path dimensionality, investment dimensionality, measures dimensionality and farmers’ satisfaction dimensionality—all have undergone their significance levels verification; impact factors share coincident contribution degree sequence to dependent variable both in Ordered Logistic Regression Model and Boost Regression Tree Model and their order is ranked as farmers’ satisfaction dimensionality, institution dimensionality, flow-path dimensionality, measures dimensionality and investment dimensionality. Based on the theoretical and empirical research results, It is concluded that it is vitally important to encourage stakeholders’ contribution and value their satisfaction degree; moreover, institution arrangement, flow-path adjustment and investment increasing should be put more emphasis.

参考文献/References:

[1] 廖建桥.中国式绩效管理:特点、问题及发展方向[J].管理学报,2013,10(6):781-788.
[2] 汪玉凯,黎映桃.公共部门绩效评估——从标准、指标和制度视角的分析[J].中国行政管理,2007(12):16-18.
[3] 聂英,王守臣.农地后备资源开发整理效益评价及分析——以吉林省西部土地开发整理重大项目为例[J].农业技术经济,2013(4):108-116.
[4] 金晓斌,周寅康,李学瑞,等.中部土地整理区土地整理投入产出效率评价[J].地理研究, 2011,30(7):1198-1206.
[5] 罗文斌,吴次芳,倪尧,等.基于农户满意度的土地整理项目绩效评价及区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(8):68-74.
[6] 郑华伟,张锐,刘友兆.利益相关者视角下农村土地整理项目绩效评价[J].中国土地科学, 2014,28(7):54-61.
[7] 张俊凤,花盛,刘友兆,等.基于改进灰靶模型的土地整治可持续性评价研究——以江苏省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(2):153-160.
[8] 汪文雄,李敏,杨钢桥,等.标杆管理视角下农地整治项目后期管护效率测度研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,14(4):75-84.
[9] 胡珍,杨钢桥,汪文雄,等.基于农户视角的农地整理项目后期管护绩效评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):198-204.
[10] 杨丽娜,何多兴,杨庆媛.土地整治后期管护影响因素及保障体系分析——以三峡库区云阳县为例[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,38(5):134-141.
[11] 赵微,吴诗嫚."结构—行为—绩效"框架下农地整理的管护绩效研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(2):249-256.
[12] 赵微,杨钢桥,李金玉,等.基于OLS和分位数回归的农地整理管护绩效研究[J].中国土地科学,2016,33(8):72-80.
[13] Neely A, Adams C. The New Spectrum: How the Performance Prism Framework Helps[J]. Business Performance Management, 2003 (2): 39-47.
[14] 贾云洁, 王会金. 价值取向与政府绩效审计评价体系构建研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2012(1): 146-149.
[15] 倪星, 余琴. 地方政府绩效指标体系构建研究——基于 BSC, KPI 与绩效棱柱模型的综合运用[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009,62(5):702-710.
[16] 彭兰香,李佳丽,刘婷. 基于绩效棱柱和PSR模型的水环保绩效审计评价体系构建研究——以浙江省"五水共治"为例[J]. 财经论丛,2015(5):67-73.
[17] 卓越.公共部门绩效评估的主体建构[J].中国行政管理,2004(5):17-20.
[18] Elith J,Leathwick J R,Hastie T.A Working Guide to Boosted Regression Trees[J].Journal of Animal Ecology,2008,77 (4): 802-813.
[19] Prasad A M,Iverson L R,Liaw A. Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction [J]. Ecosystems,2006,9( 2):181-199.
[20] 蔡文华,杨健,刘志华,等.黑龙江省大兴安岭林区火烧迹地森林更新及其影响因子[J].生态学报,2012,32(11) :3303-3312.
[21] Chen M, Lu Y, Ling L, et al. Drivers of Changes in Ecosystem Service Values in Ganjiang Upstream Watershed[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015(47): 247-252.
[22] 李春林,刘淼,胡远满,等.基于增强回归树和Logistic 回归的城市扩展驱动力分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(3):727-737.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘家成,纪月清,徐志刚.农地整理地块权属调整:多主体行动逻辑、农户需求与政策方向[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(05):130.
 LIU Jiacheng,JI Yueqing,XU Zhigang.Agricultural Land Consolidation and Land Ownership Adjustment: Exploring the Logic of Multi-subject Actions, Farmer Demands, and Policy Direction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(04):130.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-12-02。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目"农地整理项目建后管护模式的绩效及其影响机理研究:‘结构—行为—绩效’的范式"(71403094)
作者简介:赵微,男,华中农业大学公共管理学院副教授。E-mail:zhaow@mail.hzau.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-20