[1]安永军.政权“悬浮”、小农经营体系解体与资本下乡——兼论资本下乡对村庄治理的影响[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):33-40.
　AN Yongjun.Regime “Suspension”, Disintegration of Small-Scale Operating System and Capital Downward to Rural Units: the Latter’s Influence on Village Governance[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):33-40.
点击复制

政权“悬浮”、小农经营体系解体与资本下乡——兼论资本下乡对村庄治理的影响()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
18
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
33-40
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2018-01-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Regime “Suspension”, Disintegration of Small-Scale Operating System and Capital Downward to Rural Units: the Latter’s Influence on Village Governance
作者:
安永军
华中科技大学 中国乡村治理研究中心, 湖北 武汉 430074
Author(s):
AN Yongjun
关键词:
资本下乡; 水利; 小农经营体系; 村庄治理; 公共性
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
资本下乡是近年农业发展中的热点现象，既有研究主要从自上而下的视角即资本和政府的角度进行研究。以鄂北均村的个案调查为例，采用自下而上的视角，从农户与村级组织的角度来分析资本何以能够下乡。研究发现：资本下乡表面上是农户基于自身利益的理性决策，但深层原因却是政权"悬浮"导致小农经营体系解体，进而使得小农经营效益降低；此外，政权"悬浮"也使村庄治理能力弱化，村级组织为了治理卸责推动了资本下乡。资本下乡之后，村庄治理被资本利益所吸纳，公共性面临解体。
Abstract:
The capital downward to the countryside is a hot spot in agricultural development in recent years, and existing research on it is mostly conducted from the top-down perspective——the capital and the government point of view. Based on a case study of Jun Village of the northern Hubei Province, this paper takes the bottom-up perspective to analyze the way the capital downward to the countryside. The research finds that on the surface, the capital downward to the countryside is the result of rational decision of peasants based on their own interests, but the underlying reason is the regime "suspension" leading to the disintegration of small-scale operating system, which makes the small-scale operation inefficient; in addition, the regime "suspension" also weakens the village governance, and in order to shirk responsibility, village organization promotes the capital downward to the countryside. After the capital downward to the countryside, capital interests absorb village governance so that village publicness is disintegrated.

参考文献/References:

[1] 韩俊.大规模农场不适合中国[EB/OL].(2015-05-17)[2017-02-23]. http://business.sohu.com/20150517/n413221301.shtml.
[2] 人民网.农业部农村经济体制与经营管理司司长张红宇就引导农村土地有序流转答记者问[EB/OL].(2014-02-23)[2017-02-23].http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2014/0223/c70731-24438668.html.
[3] 北京天则经济研究所"中国土地问题"课题组.土地流转与农业现代化[J].管理世界, 2010(7).
[4] 胡鞍钢,吴群刚.农业企业化:中国农村现代化的重要途径[J].农业经济问题, 2001(1).
[5] 涂圣伟.工商资本下乡的适宜领域及其困境摆脱[J].改革,2014(9).
[6] 陈义媛.资本下乡:农业中的隐蔽雇佣关系与资本积累[J].开放时代,2016(5).
[7] 焦长权,周飞舟."资本下乡"与村庄的再造[J].中国社会科学, 2016(1).
[8] 王海娟.资本下乡的政治逻辑与治理逻辑[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2015(4).
[9] 曾红萍.地方政府行为与农地集中流转——兼论资本下乡的后果[J].北京社会科学, 2015(3).
[10] 郭亮.资本下乡与山林流转——来自湖北S镇的经验[J].社会,2011(3).
[11] 周飞舟.从汲取型政权到"悬浮型"政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响[J].社会学研究,2006(3).
[12] 吕德文. "拿钱的办事员"和"集体化"的消解——税费改革后的乡村治理状况[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(6).
[13] 贺雪峰. 乡村的去政治化及其后果——关于取消农业税后国家与农民关系的一个初步讨论[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012(1).
[14] 申端锋. 乡村治权与分类治理:农民上访研究的范式转换[J]. 开放时代, 2010(6).
[15] 董正华.中外农业生产中的家庭经营与小农传统——农业资本主义还是"农民的生产方式"[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2014(2).
[16] 冯小.资本下乡的策略选择与资源动用——基于湖北省S镇土地流转的个案分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014(1).
[17] 张良."资本下乡"背景下的乡村治理公共性建构[J].中国农村观察, 2016(3).
[18] 罗伯特贝茨.热带非洲的市场与国家[M].长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2011.
[19] 孙新华.再造农业[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2015.
[20] 贺雪峰,印子. "小农经济"与农业现代化的路径选择——兼评农业现代化激进主义[J]. 政治经济学评论, 2015(2).

相似文献/References:

[1]陈阿江,吴金芳.社会流动背景下农村用水秩序的演变——基于安徽蒋村的个案研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(06):33.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(01):33.
[2]冯小.资本下乡的策略选择与资源动用——基于湖北省S镇土地流转的个案分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(01):36.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(01):36.
[3]陈振,郭杰,欧名豪.资本下乡过程中农户风险认知对土地转出意愿的影响研究——基于安徽省526份农户调研问卷的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):129.
　CHEN Zhen,GUO Jie,OU Minghao.On the Effects of Farmers’ Risk Perception on Their Out-Transference Willingness in the Process of Capital Downward the Countryside[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):129.
[4]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):19.
　HE Xuefeng.Some Issues in Rural Thriving Strategy Implementation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):19.
[5]徐宗阳.资本下乡的农业经营实践——一个公司型农场内部的关系与风气[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(06):49.
　XU Zongyang.The Agricultural Management Practice of Capital Going to the Countryside: the Relations and “Fengqi” within an Agriculture Enterprise[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):49.
[6]许悦,陈卫平.资本下乡如何嵌入本地农村社区？——基于117家生态农场的实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):69.
　XU Yue,CHEN Weiping.How Is Capital Going to the Countryside Embedded into Local Rural Community? An Empirical Study Based on 117 Eco-Farms[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(01):69.
[7]望超凡.资本下乡与小农户农业收入稳定性研究——兼论农村产业振兴的路径选择[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(01):11.
　WANG Chaofan.Capital Going to Countryside and Stability of Agricultural Income ofSmall Farmers: On Path Selection of Rural Industry Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(01):11.
[8]何毅.资本下乡与经营“脱嵌”[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(03):118.
　HE Yi.Capital to the Countryside and “De-embedding” of Operation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(01):118.
[9]仇叶.乡村旅游的景观制造逻辑与乡村产业发展路径——基于赣南C县梯田景观开发的实证调研[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(02):10.
　QIU Ye.Landscape Manufacturing Logic of Rural Tourism and the Development Path of Rural Industry: Study on the Development of a Terrace Landscape[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(01):10.
[10]杨人豪,杨庆媛.资本下乡、经营土地与农政变迁——以成都市郫都区为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(03):128.
　YANG Renhao,YANG Qingyuan.Impact of Farmland Certification and Lineage Network on the Transfer of Farmland:Substitute or Complement[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(01):128.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-02-28。
基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究项目"完善基层社会治理"（14JZD030）
作者简介:安永军,男,华中科技大学中国乡村治理研究中心博士生。E-mail:anyongjun2008@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01