[1]徐涛,赵敏娟,乔丹.内陆河生态系统恢复效益评估——以黑河流域为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):127-136.
 XU Tao,ZHAO Minjuan,QIAO Dan.Ecological System Restoration Benefits Evaluation of the Continental River System in Northwestern China: Based on the Heihe River Basin[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):127-136.
点击复制

内陆河生态系统恢复效益评估——以黑河流域为例()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
18
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
127-136
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2018-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ecological System Restoration Benefits Evaluation of the Continental River System in Northwestern China: Based on the Heihe River Basin
作者:
徐涛 赵敏娟 乔丹
西北农林科技大学 经济管理学院/应用经济研究中心, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
XU Tao ZHAO Minjuan QIAO Dan
关键词:
生态系统恢复效益非市场价值选择实验偏好内陆河
分类号:
X171.1
摘要:
以黑河流域为例,详述基于选择实验法评估内陆河生态系统恢复效益的指标选取及问卷设计流程,运用RPL模型估计居民生态系统恢复偏好,并在此基础上对比城乡居民偏好差异,进而计算流域生态系统恢复效益总额。结果显示:①受访居民希望采取一定的恢复措施来改善流域生态环境,但城乡居民对恢复措施的侧重点存在偏好差异,城镇居民对河流水质、东居沿海面积和休闲娱乐条件的偏好较强,而农村居民仅对河流水质和农田灌溉保障率有较强偏好;②若在黑河流域采取一定的生态系统恢复措施,使各项生态指标达到问卷设计的最优状态,则城镇居民、农村居民及样本总体的家庭年均支付意愿分别为495.012元、277.319元和391.212元,根据样本总体估计结果计算得到的生态系统恢复效益总额为2.479亿元,高于根据城乡居民分别估计结果计算得到的2.318亿元。
Abstract:
Taking the Heihe River Basin as an example, this paper described the selection process of indicators and the questionnaire design to evaluate the ecological system restoration benefits of the continental river system by using the experiment method choosed, and the RPL model was used to estimate the utility function. Results showed that:Residents want to take some protection and restoration measures to improve the ecological environment, but there are some differences between the urban and rural residents’ choice preferences. The urban residents prefer river water quality, the area of the East Juyan Lake and the recreational conditions, while the rural residents only have a strong preference on the river water quality and farmland irrigation protection rate. If the ecological restoration measures are taken in the Heihe River Basin, so that the ecological indicators reach the optimal state, then the average annual willingness to pay for the urban residents, rural residents and the total sample are 495.012 yuan, 277. 319 yuan, and 391.212 yuan respectively, the estimated total ecological system restoration benefits are estimated to be 247.9 million yuan according to the total sample, higher than the calculated value of the urban and rural areas estimated at 231.8 billion yuan.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周立华, 王涛, 樊胜岳, 等. 内陆河流域的生态经济问题与协调发展模式——以黑河流域为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2005(1).
[2] 黄湘, 陈亚宁, 马建新. 西北干旱区典型流域生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011(8).
[3] 史恒通, 赵敏娟. 基于选择试验模型的生态系统服务支付意愿差异及全价值评估——以渭河流域为[J]. 资源科学, 2015(2).
[4] 姚柳杨, 赵敏娟, 徐涛. 耕地保护政策的社会福利分析:基于选择实验的非市场价值评估[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017(2).
[5] 孟丽红, 陈亚宁, 李卫红. 干旱区内陆河流域水资源可持续利用的生态经济研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011(S2).
[6] 张学斌, 石培基, 罗君, 等. 基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析——以石羊河流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014(3).
[7] Costanza R, de Groot R, Farber S, et al. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1).
[8] 谢高地, 张钇锂, 鲁春霞, 等. 中国自然草地生态系统服务价值[J]. 自然资源学报, 2001(1).
[9] Turner R K, Paavola J, Cooper P, et al. Valuing Nature:Lessons Learned and Future Research Directions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 46(3).
[10] 李东. 生态系统服务价值评估的研究综述[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(1).
[11] Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, et al. Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values:Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998, 80(1).
[12] Beharry-Borg N, Scarpa R. Valuing Quality Changes in Caribbean Coastal Waters for Heterogeneous Beach Visitors[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(5).
[13] Stithou M, Hynes S, Hanley N, et al. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ in the Boyne River Catchment in Ireland Using Choice Experiments[J]. The Economic and Social Review, 2013, 43(3).
[14] 张志强, 徐中民, 龙爱华, 等. 黑河流域张掖市生态系统服务恢复价值评估研究——连续型和离散型条件价值评估方法的比较应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004(2).
[15] 杜丽永, 蔡志坚, 杨加猛, 等. 运用Spike模型分析CVM中零响应对价值评估的影响——以南京市居民对长江流域生态补偿的支付意愿为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013(6).
[16] 许罗丹, 黄安平. 水环境改善的非市场价值评估:基于西江流域居民条件价值调查的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(2).
[17] Hanley N, Hanley R E, Adamowicz V. Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998, 11(3/4).
[18] McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior[M]//Zarembka P. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York:Academic Press, 1973.
[19] Hensher D, Shore N, Train K. Households’ Willingness to Pay for Water Service Attributes[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2005, 32(4).
[20] Hensher D A, Greene W H. The Mixed Logit Model:the State of Practice[J]. Transportation, 2003, 30(2).
[21] Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[22] Morrison M, Bennett J, Blamey R, et al. Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2002, 84(1).
[23] 傅颖秀, 张金龙, 陈英, 等. 黑河中游典型绿洲土地利用/覆盖变化及生态环境效应——以甘州、临泽、高台绿洲为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014(10).
[24] 李晓平, 史恒通, 赵敏娟. 黑河流域生态系统服务需求收入弹性分析[J]. 生态经济, 2016(11).
[25] 尤南山, 蒙吉军. 基于生态敏感性和生态系统服务的黑河中游生态功能区划与生态系统管理[J]. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(1).
[26] de Groot R, van der Perk J, Chiesura A, et al. Ecological Functions and Socioeconomic Values of Critical Natural Capital as a Measure for Ecological Integrity and Environmental Health[M]//Implementing Ecological Integrity. Dordrecht:Springer,2000:191-214.
[27] Kuhfeld W F. Marketing Research Methods in SAS:Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques[M]. Cary, NC, USA:SAS Institute Inc., 2010.
[28] Duke J M, Borchers A M, Johnston R J. Sustainable Agricultural Management Contracts:Using Choice Experiments to Estimate The Benefits of Land Preservation and Conservation Practices[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012(74).
[29] Johnston R J, Duke J M. Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Land Preservation and Policy Process Attributes:Does the Method Matter?[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 89(4).
[30] Johnston R J, Schultz E T, Segerson K, et al. Enhancing the Content Validity of Stated Preference Valuation:the Structure and Function of Ecological Indicators[J]. Land Economics, 2012, 88(1).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-05-26。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目"生态文明建设背景下自然资源治理体系构建:全价值评估与多中心途径"(15ZDA052);国家自然科学基金项目"西北地区水资源配置的多目标协同研究:全价值评估与公众支持"(71373209);清华大学中国农村研究院博士论文奖学金项目"全成本收益视角下节水灌溉技术补偿政策研究"(201621)
作者简介:徐涛,男,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院博士生,E-mail:xutao_2013@outlook.com;乔丹,女,西北农林科技
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01