[1]罗竖元.返乡创业质量与农民工就地市民化——基于湖南、安徽与贵州三省调查数据的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):69-78.
　LUO Shuyuan.Returned Entrepreneurial Quality and the Local Citizenization of Migrant Workers: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Survey Data of Hunan, Anhui, and Guizhou Provinces[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(06):69-78.
点击复制

返乡创业质量与农民工就地市民化——基于湖南、安徽与贵州三省调查数据的实证分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
18
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
69-78
栏目:
农民问题
出版日期:
2018-12-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Returned Entrepreneurial Quality and the Local Citizenization of Migrant Workers: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Survey Data of Hunan, Anhui, and Guizhou Provinces
作者:
罗竖元
贵州师范大学 历史与政治学院, 贵州 贵阳 550001
Author(s):
LUO Shuyuan
关键词:
返乡农民工; 创业质量; 就地市民化; 生存型创业; 成长型创业
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
现阶段农民工就地市民化不仅是有效缓解大城市对农民工市民化的承载压力，促进中小城镇经济社会发展的重要途径，同时也是农民工除了留在大城市和返回传统农业之外的第三条道路。文章通过对返乡农民工的抽样问卷调查所获数据资料进行实证分析发现：农民工返乡创业是其实现就地市民化的有效载体。农民工生存性创业质量和成长性创业质量均对其就地市民化的4个因子有显著的正向影响。同时还发现，生存性创业质量和成长性创业质量对农民工就地市民化的影响程度呈现出明显的差异，具体而言，与生存性创业质量相比，成长性创业质量更能促进农民工的就地市民化进程。因此，在引导农民工返乡创业的同时，积极引导其从"生存型创业"向"成长型创业"的转变是顺利实现就地市民化的关键。
Abstract:
Local urbanization of migrant workers is not only an effective way to alleviate the bearing pressure on the urbanization of migrant workers in large cities, but also an important way to promote the economic and social development of small and medium-sized cities and towns at present. And it is another way, between staying in a large city and returning to the traditional agriculture, which could be called the "third way". The article conducts an empirical analysis on the data obtained from the questionnaire survey on returning rural migrant workers and finds that the returned entrepreneurial activity of migrant workers in their hometowns is an effective vehicle for migrant workers to achieve local citizenization. And both of the "survival-type" and "growth-type" entrepreneurial quality of migrant workers exert a significant positive influence on the four factors of the local citizenization. At the same time, It is also found that the "survival-type" and "growth-type" entrepreneurial quality have significant differences in the degree of impact on migrant workers’ local citizenship. Specifically, compared with the former, the latter one is more effective in promoting the quality level of local citizenization of rural migrant workers. Therefore, while guiding migrant workers to return home and start their own businesses actively, it is crucial to guide their transition from "survival-type entrepreneurship" to "development-oriented entrepreneurship" as soon as possible.

参考文献/References:

[1] 罗竖元.返乡创业视角下农民工就地市民化的群体差异——基于湖南、安徽与贵州三省调查数据的实证分析[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016(3):52-60.
[2] 普蓂喆, 郑风田, 傅晋华.农民工城市扎堆创业成因探析:基于创业自我效能视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(6):61-76.
[3] 李强.影响中国城乡流动人口的推力与拉力因素分析[J].中国社会科学,2003(1):125-136.
[4] 张秀娥,王冰,张铮.农民工返乡创业影响因素分析[J].财经问题研究,2012(3):117-122.
[5] Ma Z. Urban Labour-force Experience as a Determinant of Rural Occupation Change:Evidence from Recent Urban-rural Return Migration in China[J]. Environment & Planning A, 2001, 33(2):237-255.
[6] 唐有财.从打工到创业:农民工创业的发生学研究[J].人文杂志,2013(8):105-112.
[7] 石智雷,谭宇,吴海涛.返乡农民工创业行为与创业意愿分析[J].中国农村观察, 2010(5):25-37.
[8] 周广肃,谭华清,李力行.外出务工经历有益于返乡农民工创业吗?[J].经济学(季刊), 2017(1):793-814.
[9] 李培林.中国乡村里的都市工业[J].社会学研究,1995(1):20-29.
[10] 李强,王昊.什么是人的城镇化?[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(2):1-7.
[11] 瑞雪墨菲.农民工改变中国农村[M].黄涛,王静,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2009:47.
[12] Zhou M. The Development of Ethnic Economic Theory in America:Convergence and Dispute[J]. Thinking, 2004.30(5):44-50.
[13] 刘迎君.禀赋特质、农民工回流创业与地域分层意愿[J].贵州社会科学, 2017(3):133-140.
[14] 郭星华,郑日强. 农民工创业:留城还是返乡?——对京粤两地新生代农民工创业地选择倾向的实证研究[J].中州学刊,2013(2):64-69.
[15] 杨东升.促进人的全面发展研究[M].北京:中国文联出版社,2007:102.
[16] 费孝通.乡土中国生育制度[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998:7.
[17] 张雪筠.农民工与城市主体社会[M].天津:天津社会科学院出版社,2007:159.
[18] 胡荣, 叶丽玉.主观社会经济地位与城市居民的阶层认同[J].黑龙江社会科学,2014(5):90-96.
[19] 拉雷恩.意识形态与文化身份:现代性和第三世界的在场[M].戴从容,译.上海:上海教育出版社,2005:195.
[20] 方心清,王毅杰.现代生活方式前沿报告[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:27.
[21] 阿历克斯英格尔斯.人的现代化[M].殷陆君,译.成都:四川人民出版社,1995:10.
[22] 李萍.引导新生代农民工积极创业:主动型城市适应模式的路径选择[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2016(3):61-66.
[23] Chaganti R, Greene P G. Who Are Ethnic Entrepreneurs? A Study of Entrepreneursapos; Ethnic Involvement and Business Characteristics[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2002, 40(2):126-143.
[24] 罗竖元.农民工市民化意愿的模式选择:基于返乡创业的分析视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(2):70-81.
[25] 戚迪明,张广胜,杨肖丽,等.农民工"回流式"市民化:现实考量与政策选择[J].农村经济, 2014(10):8-11.
[26] 李培林,李炜.近年来农民工的经济状况和社会态度[J].中国社会科学, 2010(1):119-131.

相似文献/References:

[1]郑永君.生计风险约束下的返乡农民工创业实践——基于川北返乡农民工创业案例的比较[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(03):55.
　ZHENG Yongjun.Business-Pioneering of Returned Migrant Workers Under Livelihood Risk Restriction: A Comparative Study on Cases in the Northern Sichuan[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):55.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-03-01。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目"农民工返乡创业与就地市民化问题研究"（13CSH034）；贵州师范大学2016年博士科研启动项目"‘异地市民化’还是‘就地市民化’：农民工市民化实现路径研究".
作者简介:罗竖元,男,贵州师范大学历史与政治学院社会工作系教授,博士,博士生导师。E-mail:luoshuyuan1981@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01