[1]李永萍.基层党建、基层治理与村庄公共性——基于对佛山市南海区禾村党建创新的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):59-68.
　LI Yongping.Party Construction, Grassroots Governance and Village Publicity: Based on the Investigation of Party Construction Innovation in Village He, Nanhai District, Foshan City in Guangdong Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(02):59-68.
点击复制

基层党建、基层治理与村庄公共性——基于对佛山市南海区禾村党建创新的考察()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
59-68
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2020-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Party Construction, Grassroots Governance and Village Publicity: Based on the Investigation of Party Construction Innovation in Village He, Nanhai District, Foshan City in Guangdong Province
作者:
李永萍
南开大学 周恩来政府管理学院, 天津 300350
Author(s):
LI Yongping
关键词:
基层党建; 基层治理; 群众路线; 村庄公共性; 治理转型
Keywords:
Party Construction; Grassroots Governance; Mass Line; Village Publicity; Transition of Governance Pattern
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
基层党建与基层治理之间具有相辅相成的关系。文章以南海区禾村的党建创新为例,探讨新时期基层党建与基层治理结合的可行路径。基层治理的核心是事务的解决,而基层党建的核心是对人的组织和动员,基层治理与基层党建存在相辅相成的关系。一方面,基层治理是基层党建的依托,在具体的治理过程中,治理事务构成了激活基层党建的载体,量化的考核体系构成激活基层党建的动力,党员联系群众构成了激活基层党建的路径,因此,基层治理重塑了基层党建的生命力,强化了基层党建引领的治理效能；另一方面,基层党建的政治引领则通过对群众的教育、组织和动员,重塑村庄的公共性,为村庄的公共性注入社会主义的政治原则,从而强化了基层治理的政治基础。因此,上述交互关系既包含以"事"为载体对人的动员和组织,也包含以"人"为主体对"事"的治理。可见,基层党建的生命力蕴含在群众路线的实践过程之中,基层党建不仅涉及党组织建设和党员作风问题,更要以基层治理为归宿,突出党员的代表性、积极性和先进性,在基层治理的实践中激活基层党员的身份意识。因此,以基层治理激活基层党建,以基层党建引领基层治理,最终形成基层党建与基层治理的良性循环,是应对转型期乡村社会复杂治理格局的基本路线。
Abstract:
The relationship between grass-roots Party construction and grassroots governance is complementary. This paper takes the innovation of the Party construction in Village He of Nanhai District as an example to discuss the feasible path of the combination of Party construction and grassroots governance in the new era. The core of grassroots governance is the settlement of affairs, while the core of grassroots Party construction is the organization and mobilization of people. Grass-roots governance and grass-roots Party building involve complementary relationship. On the one hand, basic-level management is the support of basic-level Party building, in the process of specific governance, governance issues constitute the activation of the carrier, the quantitative evaluation system forms the active power for the Party, the Party members’ ties with the masses constitutes the active path for the Party, therefore, basic-level governance has reshaped the vitality of basic-level Party building and strengthened the governance efficiency guided by Party building; On the other hand, through education, organization and mobilization of the masses, the political guidance of Party building has reshaped the public character of villages and injected socialist political principles into the public character of villages, thus strengthening the political foundation of grass-roots governance. Therefore, the above interactive relationship not only includes the mobilization and organization of people with “things” as the carrier, but also includes the governance of “things” with “people” as the subject. The vitality of grassroots Party building is contained in the practice of the mass line. Visible Party building not only involves Party organization building and Party members’ style of work, but also there should be an end-result with basic-level management, which could highlight the representativeness of Party member, enthusiasm and advancement, activate the identity consciousness of Party members in the practice of basic-level management. Therefore, to activate Party construction by grass-roots governance, and lead the grass-roots governance by Party construction, and finally form a virtuous circle of grass-roots Party construction and grass-roots governance should be a basic path to deal with the complicated rural governance problems in the transitional period.

参考文献/References:

[1] 建国以来毛泽东文稿(6册)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,1992.
[2] 蔡建国,蒋维兵.回顾·反思·展望——党群关系研究述评[J].理论学刊,2012,29(4):34-39.
[3] 王海军.建国以来中国化马克思主义党群关系理论发展基本经验探析[J].天府新论,2010,26(2):1-5.
[4] 祝灵君.党群关系:当代中国政治研究的视角[J].政治学研究,2008,24(2):22-29.
[5] 韩福国."开放式党建":基于群众路线与协商民主的融合[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2013,29(4):31-38.
[6] 王本文,刘爱莲.党群关系的现代性遭遇与超越之路[J].南京社会科学,2013,24(5):78-84.
[7] 赵士红.党群关系面临的新问题及其破解[J].中州学刊,2014,36(10):28-32.
[8] 吕德文.群众路线与基层治理——赣南版上镇的计划生育工作(1991—2001)[J].开放时代,2012,31(6):117-129.
[9] 吕德文.找回群众:基层治理的探索与重塑[J].领导科学,2016,32(10):4-6.
[10] 陈柏峰.群众路线三十年(1978—2008)——以乡村治安工作为例[J].北大法律评论,2010,11(1):88-116.
[11] 邓顺平.政党治理基层:合法性、现实行动与理论回应[J].公共管理与政策评论,2018,7(1):38-48.
[12] 陈明明.党治国家的理由、形态与限度:关于中国现代国家建设的一个讨论[J].复旦政治学评论,2008,6(1):192-255.
[13] 吴锦良.构建基层党建与基层治理良性互动的新格局——舟山市基层党建工作的实践创新[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2010,26(1):5-12.
[14] 代玉启,刘妍.党建+治理:党建引领基层社会治理的浙江探索[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2017,39(5):72-77.
[15] 李蔚.何谓公共性,社区公共性何以可能？[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,42(4):23-27.
[16] 高进,李兆友.治理视阈中的公共性[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2011,13(5):421-425.
[17] 张良.村庄公共性生长与国家权力介入[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,31(1):24-32.
[18] 贺雪峰.论中国农村的区域差异——村庄社会结构的视角[J].开放时代,2012,31(10):108-129.
[19] 杜鹏.村民自治的转型动力与治理机制——以成都"村民议事会"为例[J].中州学刊,2016,38(2):68-73.

相似文献/References:

[1]李祖佩. 项目下乡、乡镇政府“自利”与基层治理困境——基于某国家级贫困县的涉农项目运作的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(05):18.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(02):18.
[2]刘伟.治理转型中的“钉子户”及其抗争——反思既有讨论的争议与局限[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(05):123.
　LIU Wei.Discussion on ‘Nail Houses’ Protestation in the Transition of Governance:Rethinking on Related Debate and Its Limitation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(02):123.
[3]李永萍.基层小微治理的运行基础与实践机制——以湖北省秭归县“幸福村落建设”为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(05):46.
　LI Yongping.Operational Foundation and Practical Mechanism of Micro-Management at Grass-Roots Level: Taking ’Happy Village Construction’ in Zigui County, Hubei Province as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(02):46.
[4]冷波.基层规范型治理的基础与运行机制——基于南京市W村的经验分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):27.
　LENG Bo.Foundation and Operational Mechanism of Normative Governance at Grassroots Level: Empirical Analysis Based on W Village in Nanjing[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(02):27.
[5]冯川.中国农村基层治理的困境与“浑沌”的治理逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(05):41.
　FENG Chuan.The Dilemma of Grassroots Governance in Chinese Rural Areas and the Governance Logic of “Chaos”[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(02):41.
[6]高万芹.村社组织再造及其对集体产权制度改革的启示——基于广东Y市农村综合改革试验区的经验[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(02):11.
　GAO Wanqin.The Reorganization of Village Community Organization and Its Enlightenment to the Reform of Collective Property Rights System: Based on the Experience of Comprehensive Rural Reform in Y City of Guangdong Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):11.
[7]何雷,雷望红.基层党建实体化与乡村善治的形成[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(01):109.
　HE Lei,LEI Wanghong.The Substantialization of Grassroots Party Building and the Formation of Good Governance in Rural Areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(02):109.
[8]朱战辉.数字乡村建设背景下乡村精英再造与治理机制分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(06):126.
　ZHU Zhanhui.Analysis of the Reconstruction of Rural Elites and Governance Mechanisms in the Context of the Digital Rural Construction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(02):126.
[9]姜国俊,袁赞.找回群众与双向赋能:党建引领乡村治理有效的韧性机制——基于C村美丽屋场建设的个案考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(01):118.
　JIANG Guojun,YUAN Zan.Getting Masses Back and Two-way Empowerment: An Effective Resilience Mechanism for Party Building-led Rural Governance-A Case Study Based on the “Beautiful Residence Area Construction” in Village C[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(02):118.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-10。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目"新乡贤参与农村社区治理的模式和路径研究"（18CSH010）
作者简介:李永萍,女,南开大学周恩来政府管理学院助理研究员,博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01