[1]赵祥云.土地托管中的关系治理结构与小农户的组织化——基于西安市C区土地托管的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(03):44-52.
 ZHAO Xiangyun.Relational Governance Structure in Land Trusteeship and Organization of Small Farmers: Study on Land Trusteeship in Area C of Xi’an City[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):44-52.
点击复制

土地托管中的关系治理结构与小农户的组织化——基于西安市C区土地托管的分析()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
44-52
栏目:
专题:小农户与现代农业
出版日期:
2020-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relational Governance Structure in Land Trusteeship and Organization of Small Farmers: Study on Land Trusteeship in Area C of Xi’an City
作者:
赵祥云
南京大学 社会学院, 江苏 南京 210023
Author(s):
ZHAO Xiangyun
关键词:
土地托管小农户嵌入性治理结构
Keywords:
Land TrusteeshipSmall FarmersEmbeddednessGovernance Structure
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
受小农户数量仍然众多和目前城市化水平的影响,中国的农业转型必须强调小农户与现代农业发展的有机衔接。而推进小农户基础上的农业现代化,关键在于提高小农户的组织化程度,土地托管的实践在这方面表现出有效性。对土地托管的治理结构进行分析发现,在"半托"和"全托"的托管模式中,托管公司与小农户之间形成了市场和准纵向一体化的治理结构。但这两种治理结构在运行过程中都存在一定问题,包括与小农户的交易成本高,小农户的组织水平仍需要得到提高等。然而,托管公司与小农户间的交易行为嵌入政治环境和村庄社会,受到政策法规、风俗习惯、关系网络等正式制度和非正式制度的影响。在有利的政治环境中,托管公司可以获得政治合法性,减少政治阻力,顺利推进土地托管。同时,托管公司积极主动与村庄社会对接,满足农民利益,尊重农民习惯,在长期互动中,双方可以建立起双向信任关系,逐渐培育出关系治理结构。在关系治理结构下,村集体的统筹作用得到有效激活,小农户的组织化程度提高。此外,小农户对土地托管模式更加信任,有利于土地托管模式的稳定和进一步创新。在此基础上,农民建设农村和发展农业的积极性被激发,这为农业现代化和乡村振兴提供了有利条件。
Abstract:
Affected by the large number of small farmers and the current level of urbanization, China’s agricultural transformation must achieve the organic connection between small farmers and modern agricultural development. The key to promoting agricultural modernization based on small farmers is to improve the organization of small farmers and analyze the governance structure of land trusteeship. It is found that in the “semi-trust” and “full-trust” trust models, the market and quasi-predetermined period have formed. However, there is a unified governance structure between the hosting company and small farmers. There are also some problems in the operation of the two governance structures, including high transaction costs with small farmers, and the organizational level of small farmers still needs to be improved. Trading behavior is embedded in the political environment and village society, and will be affected by formal and exceptional systems such as policies and regulations, customs, networks of relationships. In a favorable political environment, the trusteeship company has political legitimacy, reduces political burden, and smoothly advances land trusteeship. At the same time, the hosting company actively connects with the village society to meet the interests of farmers and respect the habits of farmers. In the long-term interaction, the two sides can establish a two-way trust relationship and gradually develop a relationship governance structure. Under the relationship governance structure, the collective role of the village collective has been effectively activated, and the organization of small farmers has increased. In addition, small farmers have more trust in the land custody model, which is conducive to the stability and further innovation of the land custody model. On this basis, the enthusiasm of farmers to build rural areas and develop agriculture is stimulated, which provides favorable conditions for agricultural modernization and rural revitalization.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈锡文.实施乡村振兴战略,推进农业农村现代化[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,35(1):5-12.
[2] 蔡昉.遵循经济发展大逻辑深化农业供给侧结构性改革[N].中国社会科学报,2016-11-16(8).
[3] 叶敬忠,张明皓."小农户"与"小农"之辩——基于"小农户"的生产力振兴和"小农"的生产关系振兴[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(1):1-12.
[4] 仝志辉,侯宏伟.农业社会化服务体系:对象选择与构建策略[J].改革,2015(1):132-139.
[5] 孙凤莲.土地托管服务的现状、可能影响及发展对策研究——基于吉林榆树市的调查[J].农业经济,2014(8):74-76.
[6] 衡霞,程世云.农地流转中的农民权益保障研究——以土地托管组织为例[J].农村经济,2014(2):66-70.
[7] 赵晓峰,赵祥云.新型农业经营主体社会化服务能力建设与小农经济的发展前景[J].农业经济问题,2018(4):99-107.
[8] 孙新华.村社主导、农民组织化与农业服务规模化——基于土地托管和联耕联种实践的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(6):131-140.
[9] 陈义媛.土地托管的实践与组织困境:对农业社会化服务体系构建的思考[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(6):120-130.
[10] 韩庆玲.小农户经营与农业社会化服务的衔接困境——以山东省M县土地托管为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(2):20-27.
[11] 奥利弗E威廉姆森.资本主义经济制度:论企业签约与市场签约[M].段毅才,王伟,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018:69.
[12] 万俊毅.准纵向一体化、关系治理与合约履行——以农业产业化经营的温氏模式为例[J].管理世界,2008(12):93-102.
[13] 李贞芳.关于契约经济学的研究[J].社会科学动态,2000(6):18-21.
[14] 刘世定.嵌入性与关系合同[J].社会学研究,1999(4):75-87.
[15] 汪和建,李磊.通用劳动力市场的社会治理:也论《劳动合同法》的政策效果[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2011(5):138-149.
[16] Oliver E Williamson. The New Institutional Economics:Taking Stock, Looking Ahead[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000,38(3):595-613.
[17] 威廉姆森.效率、权力、权威与经济组织[M]//约翰克劳奈维根.交易成本经济学及其超越.朱舟,黄瑞虹,等,译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2002:23.
[18] Hamilton G G,Biggart N W. Market, Culture, and Authority:A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988,94(4):52-94.
[19] 波兰尼.大转型:我们时代的政治与经济起源[M].冯钢,刘阳,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2007:37-48.
[20] 马克格兰诺维特.镶嵌:社会网与经济行动[M].罗家德,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015:1-31.
[21] 诺思.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].杭行,译.上海:格致出版社,上海人民出版社,2008:51-64.
[22] 周飞舟.以利为利:财政关系与地方政府行为[M].上海:上海三联书店,2012:249-250.
[23] 张建雷,席莹.关系嵌入与合约治理——理解小农户与新型农业经营主体关系的一个视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(2):1-9.
[24] 赵晓峰,马锐.乡村治理的理论创新及其实践探索——"落实乡村振兴战略,推进乡村治理体制机制创新"研讨会综述[J].中国农村经济,2019(2):131-136.
[25] Poppo L, Zenger T. Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(8):707-725.
[26] 骆亚卓.项目契约治理与关系治理研究现状与评述[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2017(24):104-107.
[27] 周飞舟.从汲取型政权到"悬浮型"政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响[J].社会学研究,2006,21(3):1-38.
[28] 魏后凯.中国农业发展的结构性矛盾及其政策转型[J].中国农村经济,2017(5):2-17.
[29] 管珊.农业经营模式创新与演化的多重逻辑——基于土地托管模式的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(2):123-130.
[30] 陈靖,冯小.农业转型的社区动力及村社治理机制——基于陕西D县河滩村冬枣产业规模化的考察[J].中国农村观察,2019(1):2-14.
[31] Mahoney J. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology[J]. Theory and Society, 2000,29(4):507-548.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈义媛.土地托管的实践与组织困境:对农业社会化服务体系构建的思考[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(06):120.
 CHEN Yiyuan.The Practice and Organization Dilemma of Entrusted Land Management:Rethinking on Agri-cultural Social Service System Construction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):120.
[2]孙新华.村社主导、农民组织化与农业服务规模化——基于土地托管和联耕联种实践的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(06):131.
 SUN Xinhua.Village-led,Peasant Organization and Large-scale Agricultural Service:Analysis on Entrusted Land Management and Joint Farming[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):131.
[3]冯小.多元化农业经营背景下农业服务模式的创新与农业发展道路——基于三个典型案例的实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):75.
 FENG Xiao.Innovation of Agricultural Service Model and Agricultural Development Path under the Back-ground of Diversified Agricultural Management: A Three-Cases Empirical Study[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):75.
[4]叶敬忠,张明皓.“小农户”与“小农”之辩——基于“小农户”的生产力振兴和“小农”的生产关系振兴[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):1.
 YE Jingzhong,ZHANG Minghao.Differences Between Smallholders and Peasants: Smallholders Based Vitalization of Productive Forces and Peasants Based Vitalization of Productive Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):1.
[5]吴重庆,张慧鹏.小农与乡村振兴——现代农业产业分工体系中小农户的结构性困境与出路[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):13.
 WU Chongqing,ZHANG Huipeng.Small Farmers and Rural Revitalization: Structural Dilemma and Outlet of Small Farmers in Modern Agricultural Industry Division System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):13.
[6]张建雷,席莹.关系嵌入与合约治理——理解小农户与新型农业经营主体关系的一个视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(02):1.
 ZHANG Jianlei,XI ying.Relation Embedded and Contract Governance: A New Perspective of Understanding the Relationship Between Small Farm-households and New Type Agricultural Management Main-entities[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):1.
[7]陈航英.小农户与现代农业发展有机衔接——基于组织化的小农户与具有社会基础的现代农业[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(02):10.
 CHEN Hangying.Organic Connection between Smallholders and Modern Agricultural Development: Based on the Organized Smallholders and the Modern Agriculture with Social Foundation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):10.
[8]韩庆龄.小农户经营与农业社会化服务的衔接困境——以山东省M县土地托管为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(02):20.
 HAN Qingling.On the Cohesion Dilemma Between Family Management and Agricultural Social Service: Based on M County, Shandong Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):20.
[9]管珊.农业经营模式创新与演化的多重逻辑——基于土地托管模式的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(02):123.
 GUAN Shan.The Multiple Logic of Innovation and Evolution of Agricultural Management Model: Based on the Analysis of Land Trusteeship Mode[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):123.
[10]陈健,苏志豪.小农户与现代农业有机衔接:结构、模式与发展走向——基于供给侧结构改革的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(05):74.
 CHEN Jian,SU Zhihao.Smallholders’ Organic Involvement in the Development of Modern Agriculture from the Perspective of Supply-Side Reform: Structure, Mode and Development Trend[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):74.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-28。
基金项目:陕西省农业协同创新与推广联盟2017年软科学项目"农业供给侧结构改革背景下陕西省新型农业经营体系构建研究"(LMZD201708);中央基本科研业务费项目"新型农业经营主体培育与农村社会阶层结构优化机制构建研究"(2018RWSK22)
作者简介:赵祥云,女,南京大学社会学院博士生
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01