[1]陶钟太朗,潘学飞.论应还原宅基地使用权空间权属性:实然规则、应然状态及修法路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(06):125-133.
　TAO-Zhong Tailang,PAN Xuefei.On “the Restoration of Space Nature of the Use Right of Homestead”: the Rules of Reality, the State of Ought to Be and the Way to Amend the Law[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(06):125-133.
点击复制

论应还原宅基地使用权空间权属性:实然规则、应然状态及修法路径()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
125-133
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
On “the Restoration of Space Nature of the Use Right of Homestead”: the Rules of Reality, the State of Ought to Be and the Way to Amend the Law
作者:
陶钟太朗1;  潘学飞2
1. 四川师范大学 法学院, 四川 成都 610068;
2. 宜宾学院 艺术与产品设计学部, 四川 宜宾 644000
Author(s):
TAO-Zhong Tailang1;  PAN Xuefei2
关键词:
宅基地使用权; 空间权; 应然状态; 修法路径
Keywords:
The Use Right of Homestead; Space Right; the State of Ought to Be and the Way to Amend the Law
分类号:
D912.3
摘要:
对宅基地使用权客体的不合理认识，是造成当前宅基地使用权流转、继承等诸多困境的重要原因。宅基地使用权客体是空间非平面，在空间权语境下，宅基地流转、继承等问题迎刃而解。应当还原宅基地使用权空间权属性，并应以在宅基地使用权相关规范体系中系统修订形式完成。应在《民法典》中明确宅基地使用权客体为空间，同时明确其空间范围的确定方式；《土地管理法》应松绑一户一宅限制，并应明确一户仅能原始取得一宅，废止新增人口宅基地申请制度；各地方规范性文件应根据《土地管理法》授权，明确各地区的宅基地使用权客体空间范围，根据《城乡规划法》授权，制定农房单层层高下限标准，并划定农民（户）最低保有的农房建筑面积，除此部分，准允自由流转。
Abstract:
The unreasonable realization on the object of the use right of homestead is the important reason for the current system of the use right of homestead facing many difficulties, such as circulation, inheritance and so on.The object of the use right of rural residential lands is space but not plain. In the context space right, the difficulties of homestead circulation and inheritance are solved. The object of the use right of homestead should be restored to space nature, and relevant rules about homestead should be established based on the space right. In Civil Code, the object of the right to the use of homestead should be defined as the space. The Land Management Law should loosen the restriction of one family only owning one homestead, and make it clear that one family can only obtain one homestead originally, and abolish the homestead application system for new population. The local normative documents should not only clarify the detailed contents of the scope of the right to the use of homestead according to the authorization of the land management law and the lower limit standard of single storey height of rural housing according to urban and rural planning law, but also define the minimum built-up area per peasant household. and the free circulation of the rest of built-up areas should be allowed.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李自强.城镇化与逆城镇化[N].中国纪检监察报,2018-03-13(6).
[2] 蔡继明.以土地制度改革红利支撑农民消费水平提升[J].人民论坛,2019(10):52-53.
[3] 陈小君.宅基地使用权的制度困局与破解之维[J].法学研究,2019(3):48-72.
[4] 宋志红.宅基地使用权流转的困境与出路[J].中国土地科学,2016(3):71-77.
[5] 高圣平.宅基地制度改革试点的法律逻辑[J].烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(3):23-36.
[6] 高海.宅基地"三权"分置的法实现[J].法学家,2019(4):132-144.
[7] 吴雨."两权"抵押贷款试点拟不再延期,农地和农房抵押贷款宜区别对待[EB/OL].(2018-12-23)[2019-11-18].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018-12/23/c_1210022501.htm.
[8] 国务院关于全国农村承包土地的经营权和农民住房财产权抵押贷款试点情况的总结报告[EB/OL].(2018-12-23)[2019-11-18].http://www.sohu.com/a/284513537_806601.
[9] 郑振源.农村宅基地制度改革刍议[J].中国法律评论,2019(5):37-45.
[10] 高海.宅基地使用权继承:案例解析与立法构造[J].东方法学,2018(5):98-108.
[11] 陶钟太朗,杨遂全.论宅基地使用权的空间权塑造[J].中国土地科学,2014(7):16-22,64.
[12] 陶钟太朗,杨环.农民住房财产权论析——寻找法律与政策的契合[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),2016(3):97-103.
[13] 陶钟太朗,杨环.论作为新型城镇化自主动因的逆城市化[J].甘肃社会科学,2015(2):104-108.
[14] 高圣平,吴昭军.宅基地制度改革的试点总结与立法完善——以《土地管理法》修订为对象[J].山东社会科学,2019(8):103-111.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡建.农村宅基地使用权抵押的立法嬗变与制度重构[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(03):90.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(06):90.
[2]姜楠.宅基地“三权”分置的法构造及其实现路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(03):105.
　JIANG Nan.Legal Structure and Realizing Path of the “Division of Three Rights” to the Land of Homestead[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(06):105.
[3]刘国栋,蔡立东.农村宅基地权利制度的演进逻辑与未来走向[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(06):115.
　LIU Guodong,CAI Lidong.Rural Homestead Right System: Evolution Logics and Future Direction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(06):115.
[4]肖盼晴.“三权分置”背景下宅基地户内共有权的结构解析与功能实现[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(01):144.
　XIAO Panqing.The Structural Analysis and Function Implementation of Common Ownership of House Base under the Background of “Separation of Three Rights”[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(06):144.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-08-19。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大研究项目"平等公正核心价值观融入产权保护立法研究"（18VHJ007）；四川省农村发展研究中心项目"农地‘三权’权属定位与制度实现研究"（CR1822）
作者简介:陶钟太朗,男,四川师范大学法学院副研究员,博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01