[1]王玉波,王静.土地财政模式生态成本形成机理及规模估算——以辽宁省为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(05):138-151.
 WANG Yubo,WANG Jing.The Formation Mechanism and Scale Estimation of the Ecological Cost of the Land Finance Mode: Take Liaoning Province as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(05):138-151.
点击复制

土地财政模式生态成本形成机理及规模估算——以辽宁省为例()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
138-151
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2021-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Formation Mechanism and Scale Estimation of the Ecological Cost of the Land Finance Mode: Take Liaoning Province as an Example
作者:
王玉波1 王静2
1. 东北大学 文法学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110169;
2. 哈尔滨广厦学院 财经学院, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150025
Author(s):
WANG Yubo1 WANG Jing2
关键词:
土地财政生态成本规模估算辽宁省
Keywords:
Land FinanceEcological CostSize EstimationLiaoning Province
分类号:
F301
摘要:
基于土地财政模式生态成本形成机理,对其进行规模估算,能够为全面评判及降低土地财政模式生态成本提供理论分析框架及现实行政决策参考依据。从土地财政运行模式分析生态成本形成过程及涵盖内容,可以得到:前期是农地资源用途转化后生态系统服务价值损失;中期是城市建成区土地开发经营过程中的生态损耗;后期是增加土地财政模式生态服务功能的投入成本。辽宁省2003—2017年土地出让面积为191800.9 hm2,土地财政资金规模为21227.0亿元,可用资金衡量的生态成本共计4836.6亿元,每亿元土地财政资金生态成本为0.228亿元,前期、中期、后期占比分别为19.3%、0.2%、3.3%;同时,产生废气粉尘0.5 t,残余土方5963 m3,扩大城市建成区面积6.2 hm2。辽宁省在这15年间出让土地破碎度为30.3宗/km2,城市集聚度为68.4%;新增城市建成区路面夏季热岛效应可提升大气温度2.9℃;增加城镇人口人均占有出让土地面积322.4 m2。从降低地方政府对土地财政依赖性、严格控制建设占用耕地并通过整治工程增加耕地、大力开展清洁能源及路面环保材料研发与应用、提升国有土地城市集聚度及集约度、开展园林绿地建设与城市保洁等方面,提出降低土地财政模式生态成本的对策建议。
Abstract:
The scale estimation based on the formation mechanism of ecological cost of land finance model can provide theoretical analysis framework and practical reference basis for administrative decision-making for comprehensive evaluation and reduction of ecological cost of land finance model. The formation process of ecological cost and its contents from the operation mode of land finance are analyzed:in the early stage, there is the loss of ecosystem service benefits after the conversion of agricultural land resource use; in the middle period, there is the ecological loss in the process of land development and management in urban built-up areas. In the later stage, the input cost of ecological service function of land finance model is increased. From 2003 to 2017, the land transfer area of Liaoning Province was 1,91,800.9 hm2, and the scale of land finance fund was 2,122.70 billion yuan. The total ecological cost measured by available funds was 483.66 billion yuan, and the ecological cost of land finance fund was 22.8 million yuan per 100 million yuan, accounting for 19.3%, 0.2% and 3.3% in the early, middle and late stages. At the same time, 0.5 t of waste gas dust was generated, and the residual earthwork was 5963 m3, which expanded the urban built-up area by 6.2 hm2. In Liaoning Province, the broken degree of transferred land was 30.3 cases/km2, and the urban agglomeration degree was 68.4%. The summer heat island effect of pavement in newly built urban areas could increase the atmospheric temperature by 2.9℃. The per capita leased land area of urban population increased to 322.4 m2. The paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to reduce the ecological cost of land finance mode from the aspects of reducing the dependence of local government on land finance, carrying out abandoned and idle land renovation projects to increase cultivated land, research and development and application of clean energy and road environmental projection materials, improving the urban agglomeration and intensity of state-owned land, doing better job in urban cleaning and garden green space construction, etc.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邵朝对, 苏丹妮, 邓宏图.房价、土地财政与城市集聚特征:中国式城市发展之路[J].管理世界, 2016(2):19-32.
[2] 朱巧玲, 张明飞.基于中国经济制度运行效率的土地财政评价[J].经济问题, 2020(4):10-18.
[3] 卢现祥, 滕宇汯.土地财政依赖异质性如何影响地区经济发展?[J].学习与探索, 2020(7):120-129.
[4] 杨浩, 张京祥.土地财政驱动城市空间生产的机制与效应研究——以南京河西新城为例[J].国际城市规划, 2018, 33(1):68-74, 100.
[5] 余吉祥, 沈坤荣.城市建设用地指标的配置逻辑及其对住房市场的影响[J].经济研究, 2019(4):116-132.
[6] 岳树民, 卢艺.土地财政影响中国经济增长的传导机制——数理模型推导及基于省际面板数据的分析[J].财贸经济, 2016(5):37-48.
[7] 李汝资, 刘耀彬, 王文刚, 等.中国城市土地财政扩张及对经济效率影响路径[J].地理学报, 2020, 75(10):2126-2145.
[8] 张垒磊, 闫晨.土地租税与土地财政演进——基于公共物品融资的经济逻辑[J].云南财经大学学报, 2020(6):3-16.
[9] 杨孟禹, 邓仲良, 郭亚男.城市群中集群规模与产业分工不协调的原因——土地财政视角[J].软科学, 2019(9):1-12.
[10] 钟文, 钟昌标, 郑明贵.土地财政对城市土地利用效率的扭曲效应研究——基于经济集聚与产业结构视角[J].华东经济管理, 2020, 34(10):105-111.
[11] 向辉, 俞乔.债务限额、土地财政与地方政府隐性债务[J].财政研究, 2020(3):55-70.
[12] 姚小薇, 曾杰, 李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(9):249-256.
[13] 唐茂钢, 王克强, 刘红梅.土地生态价值与居民收入的关系研究——基于引入土地资本的内生经济增长模型的分析[J].经济评论, 2015(5):84-99.
[14] 崔玮, 朱志远, 苗建军.碳减排压力下城市非农用地生态成本的估算及其影响因素研究[J].经济问题, 2016(8):120-125.
[15] 张丽琴, 渠丽萍, 吕春艳, 等.基于空间格局视角的武汉市土地生态系统服务价值研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(9):1988-1997.
[16] 邓楚雄, 钟小龙, 谢炳庚, 等.洞庭湖区土地生态系统的服务价值时空变化[J].地理研究, 2019, 38(4):844-855.
[17] 薛明皋, 邢路, 王晓艳.中国土地生态系统服务当量因子空间修正及价值评估[J].中国土地科学, 2018, 32(9):81-88.
[18] 江文甲, 林满红, 翁佩莹.福建安溪县乡镇土地生态系统服务价值的演变机制[J].应用生态学报, 2021(6):2-12.
[19] Kassahun D. Towards the Development of Differential Land Taxation and Its Implications for Sustainable Land Management[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2006(9):693-697.
[20] Lafuite A S, Denise G, Loreau M. Sustainable Land-use Management Under Biodiversity Lag Effects[J]. Ecological Economic, 2018(154):272-281.
[21] Korthals A W K. Taxing Land for Urban Containment:Reflections on a Dutch Debate[J]. Land Use Policy, 2009(26):233-241.
[22] Wenner F. Sustainable Urban Development and Land Value Taxation:The Case of Estonia[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018(77):790-800.
[23] Sánchez-Braza A, Pablo-Romero M P. Evaluation of Property Tax Bonus to Promote Solar Thermal Systems in Andalusia (Spain)[J]. Energy Policy, 2014(67):832-843.
[24] Shazmin S A A, Sipan I, Sapri M.Property Tax Assessment Incentives for Green Building:A Review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016(60):536-548.
[25] ShazminS A A, Sipan I, Sapri M, et al. Property Tax Assessment Incentive for Green Building:Energy Saving Based-model[J]. Energy, 2017(122):329-339.
[26] 胡喜生, 洪伟, 吴承祯.土地生态系统服务功能价值动态估算模型的改进与应用——以福州市为例[J].资源科学, 2013, 35(5):30-41.
[27] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报, 2015, 38(8):1243-1255.
[28] 汪希成, 谢冬梅.我国玉米供需结构新变化与价格走势[J].石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 31(4):14-22.
[29] 杨文娟, 顾海荣, 单永体.路面温度对城市热岛的影响[J].公路交通科技, 2008, 25(3):147-153.
[30] 吕振江.城市便道小型道路保洁车清扫保洁与人工清扫保洁质量、效率、成本费用对比分析[J].中国设备工程, 2018(4):182-185.

相似文献/References:

[1]龚春霞.中国式征地拆迁的合理性辨析——兼评《还权赋能——成都土地制度改革探索的调查研究》[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(02):85.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(05):85.
[2]龙开胜.土地财政对土地违法的影响及违法治理政策调整[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(03):64.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(05):64.
[3]王玉波.土地财政推动经济与城市化作用机理及实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(03):70.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(05):70.
[4]陈莹,杨芳玲.中国城镇化与土地财政耦合协调关系研究——基于省级面板数据的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):106.
 CHEN Ying,YANG Fangling.Study on the Coupling Coordination Between Urbanization and Land Finance in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(05):106.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-04-08。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目"土地财政要素供给与城市用地规模增长联动绩效时空演化及调控研究"(42071248);中央高校基本科研业务费项目"区域差别化的土地财政替代供地与融资模式研究"(N2014005);辽宁省自然资源科技创新项目"辽宁省后土地财政时期区域负效应及转型政策方案研究"(19LNZRZY32)
作者简介:王玉波,男,东北大学文法学院教授,博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01