[1]徐亚东,张应良.巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接的学理阐释:基于资源配置视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(04):1-13.
 XU Yadong,ZHANG Yingliang.Theoretical Interpretation of Effective Connection of Consolidating and Expanding the Achievements of Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization: Based on the Perspective of Resource Allocation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(04):1-13.
点击复制

巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接的学理阐释:基于资源配置视角()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
23
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
1-13
栏目:
乡村振兴的理论与实践
出版日期:
2023-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Theoretical Interpretation of Effective Connection of Consolidating and Expanding the Achievements of Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization: Based on the Perspective of Resource Allocation
作者:
徐亚东 张应良
西南大学 经济管理学院/农村经济与管理研究中心, 重庆 400715
Author(s):
XU Yadong ZHANG Yingliang
关键词:
脱贫攻坚乡村振兴有效衔接平稳转型资源配置动力路径构造理论
Keywords:
Poverty AlleviationRural RevitalizationEffective ConvergenceSmooth TransformationResource Allocation SystemPath Evolution Theory
分类号:
F323.8
摘要:
在构建以国内大循环为主体、国内国际双循环相互促进的新发展格局过程中,巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接,成为目前全面推进乡村振兴亟须解决的理论和现实问题。基于路径构造理论和资源配置视角,从学理上阐释巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接问题,得出以下结论:第一,巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接的本质是资源配置的动力由"行政为主"向"市场为主"转型。第二,无论是"有效市场",还是"有为政府",都不可能绕开"有能集体"实现中国农村经济发展。第三,基于路径构造理论,巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接的关键任务是培育"有能集体",以及通过生态资本化和文化资本化实现路径突破。第四,路径创造和路径设计是较为符合当前实际情况的路径突破方式。路径创造包括人力资本培训、农村创业扶持和特色产业培育三个方面内容;路径设计包括构建防止返贫与相对贫困的治理机制、资源性资产的市场定价机制、扶贫项目资金的有效管理机制和帮扶资金转化市场资本的转化机制四个方面内容。
Abstract:
In the process of building a new development pattern in which the domestic cycle is the main body and the domestic and international cycles are mutually reinforcing, coordinating the poverty reduction strategy and the rural revitalization strategy, and consolidating and expanding the achievements of poverty alleviation and rural revitalization have become urgent theoretical and practical problems to be solved in comprehensively promoting rural revitalization. This paper is based on the path structure theory and the perspective of resource allocation, and from the theory of expanding poverty crucial achievements with rural revitalization effective cohesion problems, it draws the following conclusions:first, consolidating the development of poverty crucial achievements with rural revitalization effective cohesion is the essence of the allocation of resources from "administrative" to "market" transformation. Second, neither the "effective market" nor the "promising government" is able to bypass the "capable collective" to achieve Chinas rural economic development. Third, based on the theory of path structure, the key tasks of consolidating and expanding the achievements of poverty alleviation and rural revitalization include cultivating "capable collectives" and achieving path breakthroughs through ecological capitalization and cultural capitalization. Fourth, the path creation and path design are more in line with the current actual situation of path breakthrough way, with the former including human capital training, rural entrepreneurship support and characteristic industry cultivation in three aspects, and the latter including building a governance mechanism to prevent returning to poverty and involving relative poverty, a resource assets market pricing mechanism, an effective management mechanism of poverty alleviation project funds and support capital transformation mechanism of market capital.

参考文献/References:

[1] 兰剑,慈勤英.后脱贫攻坚时代农村社会救助反贫困的困境及政策调适[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(3):63-68.
[2] 黄承伟. 巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接的战略演进逻辑[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022, 43(6):4-11.
[3] 陈雪原. 关于"双刘易斯二元模型"假说的理论与实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015(3):34-43.
[4] 张应良,徐亚东.乡村振兴背景下农地"三权分置"制度改革的深化研究[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2020,46(4):47-57.
[5] 朱启铭. 脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴:连续性、继起性的县域实践[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2019(3):95-104.
[6] 岳国芳.脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴的衔接机制构建[J].经济问题,2020(8):107-113.
[7] 陆铭. 大国大城:当代中国的统一、发展与平衡[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2016:179-180.
[8] 张应良,徐亚东.激发乡村振兴的内生动力[N].重庆日报,2018-12-20(22).
[9] Garud R, Karnoe P. Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation[M]//Garud R, Karnoe P. Path Dependence and Creation, Mahwah, NJ:Earlbaum, 2001:1-38.
[10] Sydow J. Path-creating Networks:The Role of Consortia in Processes of Path Extension and Creation[C]. EGOS Colloquium, 2013:1-26.
[11] Sydow J, Windeler A, Müller-Seitz G,et al. Path Constitution Analysis:A Methodology for Understanding Path Dependence and Path Creation[J].Business Research, 2012, 5(2):155-176.
[12] Meyer U, Schubert C. Integrating Path Dependency and Path Creation in a General Understanding of Path Constitution[J]. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 2007(3):251-253.
[13] 钟甫宁. 中国农村脱贫历史性成就的经济学解释[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(5):4-11.
[14] 张思锋, 汤永刚, 胡晗. 中国反贫困70年:制度保障、经济支持与社会政策[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 39(5):1-11.
[15] 黄承伟.设立脱贫攻坚过渡期的政策指向和多重意蕴[J].人民论坛,2021(11):49-52.
[16] 谭九生,胡伟强.接续推进全面脱贫与乡村振兴有效衔接的路径析探——基于湖南湘西州18个贫困村的田野调查[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,45(1):31-36.
[17] 王春光.政策执行与农村精准扶贫的实践逻辑[J].江苏行政学院学报,2018(1):108-117.
[18] 朱海波,聂凤英.深度贫困地区脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有效衔接的逻辑与路径——产业发展的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(3):15-25.
[19] 刘明月,汪三贵.产业扶贫与产业兴旺的有机衔接:逻辑关系、面临困境及实现路径[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2020,57(4):137-144.
[20] 林毅夫. 新结构经济学:反思经济发展与政策的理论框架[M]. 2版. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2014:7-8.
[21] 张应良, 徐亚东. 农村"三变"改革与集体经济增长:理论逻辑与实践启示[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019, 40(5):8-18.
[22] 王东京, 王佳宁. "三变"改革的现实背景、核心要义与推广价值[J]. 改革, 2017(8):5-15.
[23] 邓大才. 论农村资产资源产权资本化经营[J]. 地质技术经济管理, 2004, 26(1):26-33.
[24] 舍尔茨.改革传统农业[M].梁小民,译.北京:商务印书馆,2006:32-156.
[25] 崔莉,厉新建,程哲.自然资源资本化实现机制研究——以南平市"生态银行"为例[J].管理世界,2019,35(9):95-100.
[26] 张五常.经济解释[M]. 增订版. 北京:中信出版社,2019:162-166.
[27] 王东京.绿水青山怎样成为金山银山[J].理论导报,2018(9):54-57.

相似文献/References:

[1]王景新,支晓娟.中国乡村振兴及其地域空间重构——特色小镇与美丽乡村同建振兴乡村的案例、经验及未来[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):17.
 WANG Jingxin,ZHI Xiaojuan.Rural Revitalization in China and its Regional Spatial Reconstruction: Case Study and Prospects of “Building up Characteristic Towns with Beautiful Countryside” to Revitalize Chinese Countryside[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):17.
[2]陈美球,廖彩荣,刘桃菊.乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):27.
 CHEN Meiqiu,LIAO Cairong,LIU Taoju.Rural Revitalization, Collective Economic Organization and Land Use System Innovation: Based on Analysis of Huangxi Village, Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):27.
[3]史志乐,张琦.脱贫攻坚保障:贫困县考核机制的改进完善和创新[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):45.
 SHI Zhile,ZHANG Qi.Guarantee for Poverty Alleviation: Improvement and Innovation of Poverty Assessment Mechanism of Poverty-Stricken Counties[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):45.
[4]黄承伟.论习近平新时代中国特色社会主义扶贫思想[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):12.
 HUANG Chengwei.On Xi Jinping’s Poverty-Relief Thoughts of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):12.
[5]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):19.
 HE Xuefeng.Some Issues in Rural Thriving Strategy Implementation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):19.
[6]刘祖云,王丹.“乡村振兴”战略落地的技术支持[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):8.
 LIU Zuyun,WANG Dan.The Technical Support for Implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):8.
[7]张艺颉.乡村振兴背景下村民自治制度建设与转型路径研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):47.
 ZHANG Yijie.Villager Self-governance System Construction and Transformation Path under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):47.
[8]王肖芳.农民工返乡创业集群驱动乡村振兴:机理与策略[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):101.
 WANG Xiaofang.A Study of Migrant Workers Returning Home to Start Businesses Cluster Drive Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):101.
[9]张勇.农村宅基地制度改革的内在逻辑、现实困境与路径选择——基于农民市民化与乡村振兴协同视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):118.
 ZHANG Yong.The Internal Logic, Realistic Predicament and Path Choice of the Rural Homestead System Reform: Based on the Coordination Perspective of Peasant’s Citizenship and Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(04):118.
[10]叶敬忠,张明皓.“小农户”与“小农”之辩——基于“小农户”的生产力振兴和“小农”的生产关系振兴[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):1.
 YE Jingzhong,ZHANG Minghao.Differences Between Smallholders and Peasants: Smallholders Based Vitalization of Productive Forces and Peasants Based Vitalization of Productive Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):1.
[11]汪三贵,冯紫曦.脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有机衔接:逻辑关系、内涵与重点内容[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(05):8.
 WANG Sangui,FENG Zixi.Organic Integration of Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization: Logical Relationship, Features and Focal Points[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):8.
[12]高强.脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有机衔接的逻辑关系及政策安排[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(05):15.
 GAO Qiang.Logic Relation and Policy for Organic Link Between Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):15.
[13]朱海波,聂凤英.深度贫困地区脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有效衔接的逻辑与路径——产业发展的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(03):15.
 ZHU Haibo,NIE Fengying.The Logic and Path of Effective Integration for Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization in Deep Poverty Areas: Perspective of Industrial Development[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(04):15.
[14]吕方.脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴衔接:知识逻辑与现实路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(04):35.
 LYU Fang.Linking Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization: Knowledge Logic and Realistic Path[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(04):35.
[15]高强.脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有效衔接的再探讨——基于政策转移接续的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(04):49.
 GAO Qiang.Discussion on the Effective Connection Between Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization: Based on the Perspective of Policy Transfer and Continuity[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(04):49.
[16]黄承伟.论乡村振兴与共同富裕的内在逻辑及理论议题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(06):1.
 HUANG Chengwei.On the Internal Logic and Theoretical Issues of Rural Revitalization and Common Prosperity[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(04):1.
[17]向德平,梅莹莹.绿色减贫的中国经验:政策演进与实践模式[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(06):43.
 XIANG Deping,MEI Yingying.The China’s Experience in Green Poverty Reduction: Policy Evolution and Practice Model[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(04):43.
[18]李博,苏武峥.欠发达地区巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接的治理逻辑与政策优化[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(06):71.
 LI Bo,SU Wuzheng.The Governance Logic and Policy Optimization on Effectively Linking Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization in Underdeveloped Areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(04):71.
[19]白增博.从贫穷到富裕:中国共产党消除绝对贫困百年辉煌实践[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(01):41.
 BAI Zengbo.From Poverty to Wealth: A Hundred Years of Brilliant Practice in Poverty Management by the CPC[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(04):41.
[20]马超峰,肖龙.条块结对:脱贫攻坚同乡村振兴有效衔接的经验阐释[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(01):78.
 MA Chaofeng,XIAO Long.Empirical Study of Sector-Village Cooperation in the Effective Link between Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(04):78.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-07-28。
基金项目:重庆市研究生科研创新项目"‘有效衔接-有能集体-有为政府’框架下促进城乡融合发展的关键桎梏及其破解途径"(CYB2022086)
作者简介:徐亚东,男,西南大学经济管理学院博士生;张应良,男,西南大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01