[1]吴越菲.重建关系性的“乡村”:实体主义乡村发展观的关系转向及其实践脉络[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(04):28-36.
　WU Yuefei.Reconstructing Relational “Rural”: The Relational Turn of Substantialism Viewpoints on Rural Development and Its Practice Context[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(04):28-36.
点击复制

重建关系性的“乡村”:实体主义乡村发展观的关系转向及其实践脉络()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
19
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
28-36
栏目:
村落发展与乡村振兴
出版日期:
2019-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reconstructing Relational “Rural”: The Relational Turn of Substantialism Viewpoints on Rural Development and Its Practice Context
作者:
吴越菲
华东师范大学 中国现代城市研究中心/社会发展学院, 上海 200241
Author(s):
WU Yuefei
关键词:
乡村发展; 实体主义; 关系转向; 实践脉络
Keywords:
Rural Development; Substantialsm; Relational Turn; Practice Context
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
乡村研究所关怀的对象不仅仅是农业、农村、农民（"三农"问题），而在更深层次包含了对总体性社会结构和社会过程的关注。"乡村"在相当长的时间内都是一种极具争议的理论建构。在全球乡村经历开放式转型的背景下，有关于乡村及其发展的一些传统理论假定需要得到批判性的检视和挑战。实体主义乡村发展观的关系转向为此提供了一种关系性的理论框架来重新理解、描述和建构乡村。乡村振兴的关键在于重构一种关系型的乡村治理体系，其对象不再简单是"人"或"物"，而是涉及城与乡、本地与全球、人类活动与自然社会系统等不同空间尺度之间的空间关系。
Abstract:
The main clues that run through rural studies are not only agriculture, rural areas, and peasant issues (the "three rural issues"), but also the related overall social structure and social processes in a deeper level. The "rural" has been a highly controversial theoretical construction for quite a long time. Some existing assumptions and conclusions on rural and rural development now urgently need to be critically scrutinized and challenged, particularly in the era of open transition of global countryside. The relational turn of substantialism viewpoints on rural development has provided a relational framework for rethinking, redescribing and reconstructing the rural. The key to rural revitalization lies in reconstructing a relational rural governance system. The targets no longer simply concentrate in "human" or "object", but contain multiple spatial relationship in different spatial scales such as urban and rural, local and global, human activities and natural social systems.

参考文献/References:

[1] 马新,齐涛.汉唐村落形态略论[J].中国史研究, 2006(2):85-100.
[2] 王庆成.晚清华北乡村:历史与规模[J].历史研究,2007(2):78-87.
[3] 文军,吴越菲. 流失"村民"的村落:传统村落的转型及其乡村性反思——基于15个典型村落的经验研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2017(4):22-45.
[4] Ray C. Neo-endogenous Rural Development in the EU[M]// Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P. The Handbook of Rural Studies. London: Sage Publications, 2006:278-291.
[5] Niska M, Vesala H T, Vesala K N. The Use of Social Psychology in Rural Development? Two Readings of Rural Business Owners’ Values[J]. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,2016(6): 581-595.
[6] Brown D L, Shucksmith M. Reconsidering Territorial Governance to Account for Enhanced Rural-Urban Interdependence in America[J]. The Annals of the American Academy, 2017(1):282-301.
[7] Desmond M. Relational Ethnography[J]. Theory and Society,2014(5):547-579.
[8] Lewicka M. Place Attachment: How Far have We Come in the Last 40 Years[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2011(3):207-230.
[9] Larsen J, Urry J, Axhausen K. Mobilities, Networks, Geographies[M]. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.
[10] Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.
[11] Massey D. The Political Challenge of Relational Space: Introduction to the Vega Symposium[J]. Geografiska Annaler, 2004(1): 3-78.
[12] Massey D. For Space[M]. Sage: London, 2005.
[13] Jones M. Limits to Thinking Space Relationally[J]. International Journal of Law in Context, 2010(3): 243-255.
[14] Woods M. Rural[M]. Routledge, Abingdon, 2011.
[15] Hedin K, Clark E, Lundholm E, et al. Neoliberalization of Housing in Sweden: Gentrification, Filtering, and Social Polarization[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012(2):443-463.
[16] Katz C. On the Grounds of Globalization: a Topography for Feminist Political Engagement[J]. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 2001(4):1213-1234.
[17] Cloke P, Goodwin M. Conceptualizing Countryside Change: from Post-Fordism to Rural Structured Coherence[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1992(3): 321-336.
[18] Murdoch J. Networks a New Paradigm of Rural Development?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2000(4): 407-419.
[19] 文军,吴晓凯. 乡村振兴过程中农村社区公共服务的错位及其反思——基于重庆市5村的调查[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2018(6):1-12.
[20] Heley J, Jones L. Relational Rurals: Some Thoughts on Relating Things and Theory in Rural Studies[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012(3):208-217.
[21] 吴越菲. 地域性治理还是流动性治理:城市社会治理的论争及其超越[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(6):51-60.
[22] Woods M. Engaging the Global Countryside: Globalization, Hybridity and the Reconstitution of Rural Place[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2007(4):485-507.
[23] 林聚任,梁亮,刘佳. 乡村振兴战略背景下的乡村文明建设——基于山东省的调查[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(1):158-167.
[24] Shucksmith M. Future Directions in Rural Development[R]. Dunfermline UK: Carnegie UK Trust, 2012.
[25] Enrico G. The Rescaling of Governance in Europe: New Spatial and Institutional Rationales[J]. European Planning Studies, 2006(7): 881-904.
[26] Healey P. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times[M]. London: Routledge, 2007.
[27] 贺雪峰. 实施乡村振兴战略要防止的几种倾向[J]. 中国农业大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(3):111-116.

相似文献/References:

[1]仇叶.实体主义与关系主义视角下社区治理研究的分殊与融合[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(01):123.
　QIU Ye.Difference and Fusion of Substantialism Perspective and Relationalism Perspective: A Literature Review of Urban Community Governance Studies[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):123.
[2]何雷,雷望红.基层党建实体化与乡村善治的形成[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(01):109.
　HE Lei,LEI Wanghong.The Substantialization of Grassroots Party Building and the Formation of Good Governance in Rural Areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(04):109.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-03-28。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目"农业转移人口的乡城流动性及其分类治理研究"（18CSH015）；上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题"大都市郊区农民的选择性市民化及其流动分化研究"（2017ESH008）；上海市教育发展基金会和上海市教育委员会"晨光计划"（17CG22）
作者简介:吴越菲,女,华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心暨社会发展学院讲师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01