[1]杜园园,苏柱华.钟摆式家庭：集体经济与社会伦理建构下的家庭特征与发展困境——以珠江三角洲地区的S村为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(02):100-107.
　DU Yuanyuan,SU Zhuhua.Pendulum-style Family: the Family Characteristics and Development Dilemma under the Dual Construction of Collective Economy and Social Ethics——Take S Community in the Pearl River Delta Region as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(02):100-107.
点击复制

钟摆式家庭：集体经济与社会伦理建构下的家庭特征与发展困境——以珠江三角洲地区的S村为例()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
100-107
栏目:
农民生计与保障
出版日期:
2022-03-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Pendulum-style Family: the Family Characteristics and Development Dilemma under the Dual Construction of Collective Economy and Social Ethics——Take S Community in the Pearl River Delta Region as an Example
作者:
杜园园;  苏柱华
广东省农业科学院 农业经济与信息研究所, 广东 广州 510640
Author(s):
DU Yuanyuan;  SU Zhuhua
关键词:
集体经济; 宗族伦理; 财产继承; 家庭成员关系
Keywords:
Collective Economy; Clan Ethics; Inheritance of Property; Family Member Relationship
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
通过分析珠江三角洲地区S村家庭成员关系,发现在集体经济分配制度与宗族文化伦理的双重影响下,家庭发展呈现以父子、婆媳关系为主轴,以夫妻、兄弟关系为辅轴,指针摆向父子关系轴的钟摆式特点。"股份量化到人、固化到户、户内继承"的集体经济收益分配制度,为原本以父权为主的宗族社会伦理提供了经济支撑,强化了父权的家庭伦理秩序。集体分配制度让父母掌握了具有较高价值的宅基地、房屋以及集体经济股权,子女在经济上依附父母,难以获得独立成长的机会,家庭发展面临内生动力不足问题。集体经济发达地区的产权制度深化改革,应强调集体经济组织的利益协调机制,侧重通过集体再分配保证家庭成员平等享受集体收益,以利于家庭良性发展。
Abstract:
Analyzing the family member relationship in the S community in the Pearl River Delta, it is found that family development presents pendulum characteristic with the main axis being the father-sonrelationship, the secondary axis being the spouse relationship, and the pointer swinging toward the father-son relationship axis under the dual influence of the collective economic distribution system and the clan cultural ethics. The distribution system of collective economic benefits of "stock quantified to people, solidified to households, and inherited within households" provides economic support for the patriarchal clan social ethics and strengthens the patriarchal family ethical order. The collective distribution system enables parents to control high-value homestead, house and collective economic equity, so children are economically dependent on their parents, unable to obtain independent growth opportunities, and family development is faced with the problem of insufficient endogenous motivation. To deepen the reform of the property right system in the developed areas of collective economy, we should emphasize the interest coordination mechanism of collective economic organizations, focus on ensuring the equal enjoyment of collective benefits by family members through collective redistribution, and make it more conducive to the healthy development of families.

参考文献/References:

[1] 费孝通.乡土社会·乡土重建[M].北京:群言出版社,2016:44-46.
[2] 夏柱智,贺雪峰.半工半耕与中国渐进城镇化模式[J].中国社会科学,2017(7):117-137.
[3] 贺雪峰.应对老龄社会的家庭农业[J].人文杂志,2017(10):103-109.
[4] 何倩倩.城镇化、家庭再生产压力与代际关系重构——以北方农村"老人不老"现象为例[J].学习与实践,2019(12):96-104.
[5] 李永萍."半工半耕"的区域差异与农民家庭发展[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):47-54.
[6] 吴重庆.孙村的路:后革命时代的人鬼神[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:141-155.
[7] 贺雪峰.浙江弄古城内与珠江三角洲农村的比较——以浙江宁海与广东东莞作为对象[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2017(6):91-99.
[8] 桂华."嵌入"家庭伦理的农民经济生活——基于华北与江汉地区农村的比较[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2011(3):70-74.
[9] 贺雪峰.新乡村中国[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013:47.
[10] 贺雪峰.地权的逻辑:中国农村土地制度向何处去[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2010:8.
[11] 崔娜娜.地租经济下珠江三角洲地区代际关系变迁研究——基于对广东省S区实地调查[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2019:34-36.
[12] 卢青青.过渡型城中村的矛盾内部化和治理困境[J].江汉学术,2020(3):33-41.
[13] 李永萍.新家庭主义与农民家庭伦理的现代适应[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):41-51.

相似文献/References:

[1]高强,宋洪远.农村土地承包经营权退出机制研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):74.
　GAO Qiang,SONG Hongyuan.Study on the Exit Mechanism of Contractual Right of Rural Lands[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(02):74.
[2]杜鹏.乡村振兴战略下的集体经营机制:类型与比较——基于村庄治理能力的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(01):52.
　DU Peng.Collective Management Mechanism Under Rural Vitalization Strategy: Typesand Comparison from the Perspective of Village Governance Capacity[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):52.
[3]高强,鞠可心.农村集体产权制度的改革阻点与破解路径——基于江苏溧阳的案例观察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(02):1.
　GAO Qiang,JU Kexin.Reform Obstacles and Resolutive Path of Rural Collective Property Right System: A Case Observation Based on Liyang City, Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):1.
[4]孙新华,赵祖远,王宁.服务型集体经济的内涵与组织基础[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(03):68.
　SUN Xinhua,ZHAO Zuyuan,WANG Ning.Service-oriented Collective Economy’s Connotation and Organizational Basis[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):68.
[5]曾凡木,蒋晓雨.集体经济管理的规范化与乡村关系变迁[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(03):78.
　ZENG Fanmu,JIANG Xiaoyu.The Standardization of Collective Economic Management and Changes of Township Government-village Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):78.
[6]陈靖.解析集体:制度通道与治理实践[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(03):96.
　CHEN Jing.Study on Collectivity as Institution: Institutional Channel and Governance Process[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):96.
[7]孙新华,和夏妍.公益项目包干:集体经济发展的路径探索及其实现机制[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(04):52.
　SUN Xinhua,HE Xiayan.Undertaking Public Welfare Projects: The Path Exploration and Realization Mechanism of Collective Economic Development[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(02):52.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-05-27。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金后期资助暨优秀博士论文项目"村庄社会主导下的农村集体产权制度改革研究"(20FSHB027)
作者简介:杜园园,女,广东省农业科学院农业经济与信息研究所副研究员,武汉大学中国乡村治理研究中心研究人员。
通讯作者:苏柱华(通信作者),男,广东省农业科学院农业经济与信息研究所研究员
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01