[1]沈费伟,胡紫依.乡村数字弱势群体能力贫困的内生原因与解决对策——基于森的“可行能力”理论探讨[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(02):112-123.
　SHEN Feiwei,HU Ziyi.The External Cause and Solution Measures of Capability Poverty of Rural Digital Vulnerable Groups: Based on Sen’s Theory of "Feasible Ability"[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(02):112-123.
点击复制

乡村数字弱势群体能力贫困的内生原因与解决对策——基于森的“可行能力”理论探讨()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
24
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
112-123
栏目:
乡村治理现代化
出版日期:
2024-04-03

文章信息/Info

Title:
The External Cause and Solution Measures of Capability Poverty of Rural Digital Vulnerable Groups: Based on Sen’s Theory of "Feasible Ability"
作者:
沈费伟;  胡紫依
杭州师范大学 公共管理学院, 杭州 311121
Author(s):
SHEN Feiwei;  HU Ziyi
关键词:
数字弱势群体; 能力贫困; 可行能力; 数字乡村; 高质量发展
Keywords:
Idigital Vulnerable Groups; Ability Poverty; Feasible Ability; Digital Countryside; High Quality Development
分类号:
F320
摘要:
乡村数字弱势群体的能力贫困是数字时代不可规避的现实问题, 也是阻碍数字乡村高质量发展的重要因素。本文引入阿玛蒂亚·森的可行能力理论, 尝试深入剖析乡村数字弱势群体能力贫困的形成机理。研究发现, 当前乡村数字弱势群体能力贫困体现为教育知识能力的偏差、获取信息能力的缺乏、风险应对能力的脆弱和自主发展能力的低下, 并呈现整体连片性、代际传递性、能力脆弱性、贫困多维性、问题持续性的特点。上述问题受个体异质、家庭关系、社会氛围、制度政策等多要素影响, 实则反映乡村数字弱势群体政治参与不足、经济条件受限、社会机会缺乏、透明性保证不高、防护性保障不足的根本原因。为提升乡村数字弱势群体的可行能力, 未来需拓展社会参与渠道、强化资源共享配置、完善公共服务保障、促进信息公开透明、维护底层民众权益, 最终实现数字乡村的高质量发展目标。
Abstract:
The digital divide faced by rural communities, particularly among vulnerable groups, is a pressing issue in the contemporary digital era, posing a significant challenge to the sustainable and high-quality development of rural areas equipped with digital technologies. This study endeavors to address this gap by adopting Amartya Sen’s capability approach as a theoretical lens to intricately examine the mechanisms underlying the capacity poverty experienced by rural digital vulnerable groups. It also aims to propose innovative strategies for mitigation and improvement. The analysis reveals that the capacity poverty of these groups is manifested in several key areas, including educational knowledge, information access, risk management, and self-directed development. These manifestations exhibit characteristics such as interconnectedness, intergenerational transmission, capacity vulnerability, multidimensional poverty, and persistence. These issues are influenced by a complex interplay of innate factors, socio-economic realities, environmental conditions, policy frameworks. These, in turn, reflect deeper seated problems including insufficient political engagement, economic constraints, limited social opportunities, low transparency, and inadequate protective measures for the rural digital vulnerable groups. To address the issue of enhancing the capabilities of these groups, it is imperative to broaden their social participation, strengthen resource sharing and allocation mechanisms, improve public service provision, foster the principles of information transparency and openness, and ensure the protection of grassroot level rights and interests. By doing so, we can work towards achieving the overarching goal of high-quality digital rural development that is inclusive and equitable.

参考文献/References:

[1] UNDP. Human Development Report 1996[R]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1996:2-35.
[2] 沈费伟, 蔡欣濛. 乡村"数字弱势群体"的形成原因与权利保障研究[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 45(3):123-136.
[3] 梁伟军, 谢若扬. 能力贫困视阈下的扶贫移民可持续脱贫能力建设研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(4):105-114.
[4] 方劲. 可行能力视野下的新阶段农村贫困及其政策调整[J]. 经济体制改革, 2011(1):73-78.
[5] 田北海, 徐杨. 可行能力视角下家庭支出型贫困的致贫机理及其治理——基于湖北省四个县(市)的调查[J]. 社会保障研究, 2020(4):84-92.
[6] 徐琪新. 能力视角下农村脱贫攻坚政策的创新路径研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2020(1):139-144.
[7] 翟羽佳, 周常春, 车震宇. 能力贫困视域下多维贫困农户能力再造研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(4):93-96.
[8] 方珂, 蒋卓余. 生计风险、可行能力与贫困群体的能力建设——基于农业扶贫的三个案例[J]. 社会保障研究, 2019(1):86-95.
[9] 沈费伟. 乡村技术赋能:实现乡村有效治理的策略选择[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(2):1-12.
[10] Bourdieu P. The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups[J]. Theory and Society, 1985, 14(6):723-744.
[11] 邹薇. 传统农业经济转型的路径选择:对中国农村的能力贫困和转型路径多样性的研究[J]. 世界经济, 2005, 28(2):34-47.
[12] Margarian A. A Constructive Critique of the Endogenous Development Approach in the European Support of Rural Areas[J]. Growth and Change, 2013, 44(1):1-29.
[13] 刘少杰. 数字乡村建设悬浮的成因与对策[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 39(5):5-12.
[14] 沈费伟, 杜芳. 数字乡村建设中老年人参与的包容性治理:现实困境与实现路径[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 44(1):103-111.
[15] Valdez M E, Doktor R H, Singer A E, et al. Impact of Tolerance for Uncertainty Upon Opportunity and Necessity Entrepreneurship[J]. Human Systems Management, 2011, 30(3):145-153.
[16] 阿玛蒂亚·森. 以自由看待发展[M]. 任赜, 于真, 译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2002.
[17] Rawls J. A Theory of Justice[M]. Cambridge Mass:Harvard University Press, 1971:3.
[18] 汪训前. 消除"数字鸿沟"迈向城乡一体化——"信息化服务三农"研讨会摘录[N]. 湖北日报, 2012-10-18(11).
[19] 高盼盼, 冯喜良, 尹振宇. 人力资本视角下社会经济地位代际传递效应研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2021, 42(8):70-80.
[20] Lewin K. The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces[J]. Psychiatry Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 1940(4):822-823.
[21] Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3):481-510.
[22] 李元书, 刘昌雄. 新中国推进政治参与的经验和教训分析[J]. 探索, 1997(6):48-51.
[23] 雷宇, 陈岩. 我国整体农民政治能力处于中等水平[N]. 中国青年报, 2014-10-31(03).
[24] 马丽娟, 雷嘉兴, 顾煜, 等. 农村电商人才之困:引不来留不住难培养[N]. 经济参考报, 2022-01-10(04).
[25] 方正梁. 关注数字弱势群体:如何让数字世界更"适"老[N]. 人民邮电, 2023-05-16(05).
[26] 沈费伟, 曹子薇. 从数字鸿沟到数字包容:老年人参与数字乡村建设的策略选择[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(1):21-29.
[27] Sen A. Well-being, Agency and Freedom:The Dewey Lectures 1984[J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 1985, 82(4):169-221.
[28] Rosa H, Trejo-Mathys J. Social Acceleration:A New Theory of Modernity[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 2013:71.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-07-15。
基金项目:浙江省哲学社会科学规划之江青年专项课题"数字乡村建设助推共同富裕的实践逻辑与优化路径研究"(24ZJQN047Y)
作者简介:沈费伟, 男, 杭州师范大学公共管理学院副教授; 胡紫依, 女, 杭州师范大学公共管理学院硕士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01