«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

25

期数:

2025年06期

页码:

28-39

栏目:

乡村振兴的理论与实践

出版日期:

2025-11-14

文章信息/Info

Title:

Practice Models and Limitations of Operating Collective Economy with Coordinated Farmland Under the Common Prosperity Goal: Case Studies from Typical Agricultural Villages in Central and Western China

作者:

董怡琳¹;  叶敬忠²

1. 江苏省社会科学院 社会学研究所, 南京 210004;
2. 中国农业大学 人文与发展学院, 北京 100193

Author(s):

DONG Yilin¹;  YE Jingzhong²

关键词:

共同富裕; 集体经济; 农业型村庄; 农地统筹经营; 农业转型

Keywords:

Common Prosperity; Collective Economy; Agricultural Village; Coordinated Operation of Farmland; Agricultural Transformation

分类号:

C912.82

摘要:

发展兼顾经济和社会双重效益的集体经济是实现农民共同富裕的有效路径。面对外部支持不足、内生资源匮乏的困境,中西部地区的一些农业型村庄统筹农地资源,通过农业转型来发展集体经济,形成农地统筹经营型集体经济模式。基于政治经济学四大关键问题分析框架,结合河南省乔家村的典型案例,对该模式的实践路径、内在困境及其深层逻辑进行剖析。研究发现,村集体通过权利让渡来统筹规模农地,并利用雇佣劳动和生产性服务开展规模化经营,以此促成村社本位的规模化效益,最终,经营收益主要用于增进集体的社会化福利。从结果来看,村集体的资本式经营和社会化分配保证了集体经济双重效益的实现,然而,其背后隐藏的资本积累与福利分配逻辑之间的张力和冲突也导致了诸多潜在困境,包括农民生计脆弱性加剧、合作社经营风险凸显以及村庄维稳压力增大等方面。这在一定程度上削弱了集体经济发展的实际成效。立足共同富裕目标,应关注集体经济双重效益实现过程中的内在张力,推动农业型村庄集体经济向农业统筹服务型模式转型,实现集体经济与农业转型的有效协同发展。

Abstract:

Developing the collective economy that takes into account both economic and social benefits is an effective way to achieve common prosperity for farmers. Faced with the dilemma of insufficient external support and lack of endogenous resources, some agricultural villages in central and western regions have coordinated farmland and developed collective economy through agricultural transformation, forming the operating collective economy model with coordinated farmland. Based on the analytical framework of four key issues in political economy and combined with the typical case of Qiaojia Village in Henan Province, this paper analyzes the practical path, inherent dilemmas and deep logic of this model. The study finds that the village collective coordinates large-scale farmland through the transfer of rights, and uses wage labor and productive services to carry out large-scale operation, thus promoting the large-scale benefits of village community-based, and ultimately, these benefits are mainly used to enhance the social welfare of the collective. Judging from the results, the village collective’s capital-based operation and socialized distribution have ensured the realization of dual benefits of the collective economy. However, the hidden tension and conflict between the logic of capital accumulation and welfare distribution leads to many potential dilemmas, including the increased vulnerability of farmers’ livelihoods, the heightened risk of cooperative operation, and the increased pressure on village stability. It weakens the actual effectiveness of collective economic development to a certain extent. With the goal of common prosperity in mind, attention should be paid to the inherent tensions in achieving the dual benefits of the collective economy. Efforts should be made to promote the transformation of the collective economy in agricultural villages toward a coordinated agricultural service model, thereby achieving effective synergistic development between the collective economy and agricultural transformation.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2024-12-6。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“从脱贫攻坚到乡村振兴的有效衔接与转型研究”(20&ZD163)
作者简介:董怡琳,女,江苏省社会科学院社会学研究所助理研究员;叶敬忠,男,中国农业大学人文与发展学院教授,博士生导师。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01