[1]郭利京,赵瑾.认知冲突视角下农户生物农药施用意愿研究——基于江苏639户稻农的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(02):123-133.
　GUO Lijing,ZHAO Jin.A Study on Farmers Willingness of Biological Pesticide Application from the Perspective of Cognitive Conflict: An Empirical Analysis Based on 639 Rice Farmers in Jiangsu[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(02):123-133.
点击复制

认知冲突视角下农户生物农药施用意愿研究——基于江苏639户稻农的实证()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
123-133
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2017-03-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on Farmers Willingness of Biological Pesticide Application from the Perspective of Cognitive Conflict: An Empirical Analysis Based on 639 Rice Farmers in Jiangsu
作者:
郭利京1;  赵瑾2
1. 安徽财经大学 经济学院, 安徽 蚌埠 233030;
2. 安徽科技学院 管理学院, 安徽 滁州 233100
Author(s):
GUO Lijing1;  ZHAO Jin2
关键词:
认知冲突; 生物农药; 施用意愿; 农户
分类号:
F323.22
摘要:
基于认知冲突理论，以江苏省洪泽、海安、溧阳三县（市）639户稻农为样本，从农户个人特征和社会关系网络两方面分析了生物农药推广中农户认知冲突的形成原因，以及影响其生物农药施用意愿的因素。结果发现：（1）在农户个人特征方面，生物农药知识、知觉行为效能分别负向影响农户认知冲突，正向影响农户施用意愿；而价格差异敏感性则正向影响农户认知冲突，负向影响农户施用意愿；（2）在社会关系网络方面，社会规范认同负向影响农户认知冲突，正向影响农户施用意愿，而对同伴行为的预期则仅仅对农户生物农药施用意愿具有正向影响作用；（3）认知冲突通过生物农药知识、知觉行为效能对农户生物农药施用意愿影响起中介作用。研究深化了生物农药推广过程中农户认知冲突的形成原因，对提高公共部门和农药经销企业生物农药推广的有效性，激励农户生物农药施用意愿具有理论和实践意义。
Abstract:
The present paper deals with the causes of farmers’ cognitive conflict in biological pesticides promotion and the farmers’ willingness of biological pesticide application factors from farmers’ personal characteristics and social network aspects, taking 639 rice farmers of the main production in three cities-Haian, Hongze and Liyang-in Jiangsu Province as samples, and based on cognitive conflict theory. The results found:(1) In the aspects of farmers’ personal characteristics, biological pesticide knowledge and perceived behavioral effectiveness had negative impact on farmers’ cognitive conflict, but positive impact on farmers’ willingness, but the sensitivity of biological pesticide and chemical pesticide price difference had positive impact on farmers’ cognitive conflict, but negative impact on farmers’ willingness. (2)In the social relation network, the social norm identity had a negative impact on the farmer’s cognitive conflict, but a positively affected the farmers’ willingness, and the expectation of peer behavior had positive effect on the willingness of farmers to use biological pesticides. (3)Our study also confirmed that cognitive conflict influenced on farmers’ willingness of biological pesticides application, through biological pesticide knowledge, and perceived behavioral effectiveness. The farmers’ cognitive conflict causes were deepened in the process of bio-pesticide promotion, and our study has great theoretical and practical significance to the public sector and pesticide enterprises for improving the effectiveness and encouraging farmers’ willingness to biological pesticide application.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邱德文.生物农药的发展现状与趋势分析[J].中国生物防治学报,2015,31(5):679-684.
[2] 郭利京,王少飞.基于调节聚焦理论的生物农药推广有效性研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016, 26(4):126-134.
[3] Setãlã H, Bardgett R D, Birkhofer k, et al. Urban and Agricultural Soil:Conflicts and Trade-offs in the Optimization of Ecosystem Services[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2014, 17(1):239-253.
[4] Seamon D. A Geography of the Lifeworld (Routledge Revivals):Movement, Rest and Encounter[M]. Routledge, 2015:35-39.
[5] Ackermann K A, Fleiss J, Murphy R O. Reciprocity as an Individual Difference[J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2016, 60(2):340-367.
[6] Volkow N D, Swanson J M, Evins A E, et al. Effects of Cannabis Use on Human Behavior, Including Cognition, Motivation, and Psychosis:a Review[J]. JAMA psychiatry, 2016, 73(3):292-297.
[7] Lee B H, Hiatt S, Lounsbury M. Market Mediators and the Tradeoffs of Legitimacy-seeking Behaviors in a Nascent Category[R]. Marshall School of Business Working Paper No. MOR, 2016, 4.
[8] Zimbardo P G, Boyd J N. Putting Time in Perspective:A Valid, Reliable Individual-differences Metric[M]//Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application. Springer International Publishing, 2015:17-55.
[9] 王喆.社会政治议题网络讨论之认知失调与选择性修正[J].国际新闻界,2016,38(2):57-72.
[10] Iles A, Martin A N. Expanding Bioplastics Production:Sustainable Business Innovation in the Chemical Industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 45:38-49.
[11] de Snoo G R, Herzon I, Staats H, et al. Toward Effective Nature Conservation on Farmland:Making Farmers Matter[J]. Conservation Letters, 2013, 6(1):66-72.
[12] Elsawah S, Guillaume J H A, Filatova T, et al. A Methodology for Eliciting, Representing, and Analysing Stakeholder Knowledge for Decision Making on Complex Socio-ecological Systems:From Cognitive Maps to Agent-based Models[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 151:500-516.
[13] 万仁德,李先艳.青少年边缘人格障碍的社会工作介入路径[J].江汉大学学报(社会科学版),2015, 32(2):51-57.
[14] Harper C. Organizations:Structures, Processes and Outcomes[M]. Routledge, 2015:45-53.
[15] 李艺敏,李永鑫.青少年人际关系能力对社交自卑感和心理健康的影响:社会适应性的作用[J].心理科学,2015,38(1):109-115.
[16] 苏时鹏,吴俊媛,甘建邦.林改后闽浙赣家庭林业全要素生产率变动比较[J].资源科学, 2015, 37(1).
[17] 宁可,沈月琴,朱臻.农户对森林碳汇认知及碳汇林经营意愿分析——基于浙江、江西、福建3省农户调查[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,13(2):63-69.
[18] Schomers S, Sattler C, Matzdorf B. An Analytical Framework for Assessing the Potential of Intermediaries to Improve the Performance of Payments for Ecosystem Services[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42(7):58-70.
[19] 范志勇,宋佳音.消费者价格指数能反映生活成本吗[J].经济理论与经济管理,2014(9):56-65.
[20] Anderson N, Poto?nik K, Zhou J. Innovation and Creativity in Organizations a State-of-the-science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5):1297-1333.
[21] Yang C Y, Fang Z, Li B, et al. Review and Prospects of Jatropha Biodiesel Industry in China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(4):2178-2190.
[22] 林亚清,赵曙明.基于战略柔性与技术能力影响的制度支持与企业绩效关系研究[J].管理学报, 2014,11(1):46-54.
[23] Lefebvre M, Langrell S R H, Gomez-y-Paloma S. Incentives and Policies for Integrated Pest Management in Europe:a Review[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35(1):27-45.
[24] Yue F, Cheng Y, Breschi A, et al. A Comparative Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Mouse Genome[J]. Nature, 2014, 515(7527):355-364.
[25] Walter K J, Armstrong K V. Benefits, Threats and Potential of Prosopis in South India[J]. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 2014, 23(4):232-247.
[26] Iliodromiti S, Kelsey T W, Wu O, et al. The Predictive Accuracy of Anti-Müllerian Hormone for Live Birth After Assisted Conception:a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Literature[J]. Human Reproduction Update, 2014, 20(4):560-570.
[27] Jepson P C, Guzy M, Blaustein K, et al. Measuring Pesticide Ecological and Health Risks in West African Agriculture to Establish an Enabling Environment for Sustainable Intensification[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B:Biological Sciences, 2014, 369(1639):20130491.
[28] Kehoe R R, Wright P M. The Impact of High-performance Human Resource Practices on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39(2):366-391.
[29] Lucas R J, Peirson S N, Berson D M, et al. Measuring and Using Light in the Melanopsin Age[J]. Trends in Neurosciences, 2014, 37(1):1-9.
[30] Zweig G E. Principles, Methods, and General Applications:Analytical Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators, and Food Additives[M]. Elsevier, 2013:67-69.
[31] Robertson J L, Barling J. Greening Organizations Through Leaders’ Influence on Employees Pro-environmental Behaviors[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(2):176-194.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-08-29
基金项目:安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题攻关项目“安徽农业生态经济发展战略研究”（2016CX024）；安徽高校人文社科重点项目“低碳经济背景下安徽农作物秸秆资源化利用研究”（SK2015A307）；安徽省社会科学规划项目“安徽农业面源污染负荷估算及治理研究”（AHSKQ2016D105）
作者简介:郭利京,男,安徽财经大学经济学院副教授,硕士生导师,E-mail:guolijing0379@163.com;赵瑾,女,安徽科技学院管理学院讲师,E-mail:nj
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01