[1]孙彦斐,唐晓岚,刘思源.乡村文化景观保护的现实境遇及路径——基于“人地关系”的环境教育路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(01):117-126.
　SUN Yanfei,TANG Xiaolan,LIU Siyuan.The Actual Situation and Path of Rural Cultural Landscape Protection: Environmental Education Path Based on “Human-Land Relationship”[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(01):117-126.
点击复制

乡村文化景观保护的现实境遇及路径——基于“人地关系”的环境教育路径()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
117-126
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2020-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Actual Situation and Path of Rural Cultural Landscape Protection: Environmental Education Path Based on “Human-Land Relationship”
作者:
孙彦斐1;  唐晓岚1; 2;  刘思源1
1. 南京林业大学 风景园林学院, 江苏 南京 210037;
2. 南京林业大学 中国特色生态文明建设与林业发展研究院, 江苏 南京 210037
Author(s):
SUN Yanfei1;  TANG Xiaolan1; 2;  LIU Siyuan1
关键词:
乡村振兴; 环境教育; 乡村文化景观; 人地关系
Keywords:
Rural Revitalization; Environmental Education; Rural Cultural Landscape
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
乡村文化振兴是乡村振兴战略的重要抓手，但乡村文化景观的现实境遇堪忧，集中表现在传统建筑、街道的破坏，优良文化传统的消弭以及文化联结、治理体制的脱节等。乡村文化景观本质上是人与环境关系的一种文化体现，既包含物质形态的实体景观，也包含人地关系、社会结构等精神层面的意识形态。乡村文化的振兴关键在于重构一种人与环境协调发展的文化景观治理体系，本文在充分认识乡村文化景观保护的内在逻辑的基础上，对乡村文化景观存续的内在逻辑进行深入认知研究，剖析了乡村文化景观保护的现实境遇及其产生原因，探究了乡村文化景观演进发展的路径，进一步通过厘清人地关系理论与环境教育之间的耦合机制，将环境教育用于解决人与环境的关系，明确了环境教育能够成为乡村文化景观保护的路径。在文化景观保护的实践层面，将人地关系为核心的环境教育实践，取代以往单纯的制度设计以及片面的保护手段，通过对表层物态实体、中层互动关系、深层社会机制三个层面的乡村人地关系进行深入研究，从认知上进行更广泛的维度拓展，并将环境教育的宗旨、方法嵌入乡村文化景观保护，在文化景观的保护管理职能中增加环境教育职能，实现乡村文化景观的人性化保护，从而实现乡村文化全面振兴。
Abstract:
The revitalization of rural culture is an important part of the strategy of rural revitalization. However, the realistic situation of rural cultural landscape is problematic, which is mainly reflected in the destruction of traditional buildings, streets, elimination of fine cultural traditions, as well as the disconnection of cultural connection and governance system. Rural cultural landscape is essentially a cultural embodiment of the relationship between human and environment, including not only the physical "landscape" of material form, but also the spiritual ideology of human-land relationship and social structure. Countryside cultural reconstruction is the key to the revitalization of people and environment-coordinated development of the cultural landscape management system. Based on the fully understanding of the inherent logic of rural cultural landscape protection, and based on an in-depth cognition research on the inherent logic of rural cultural landscape survival, this paper analyzed the real situation of rural cultural landscape protection and its causes, explores the evolution of rural cultural landscape development path. This paper further clarifies the coupling mechanism between human-land relationship theory and environmental education, applies environmental education to combing the relationship between human and environment, and makes clear that environmental education can become a new perspective of rural cultural landscape protection. At the practical level of cultural landscape protection, this paper takes human-land relationship as the core of environmental education practice, replacing the previous simple institutional design and one-sided protection means. In this paper, the three aspects of the relationship between rural people surface state entity class, middle interactions and deep social mechanism are given an in-depth study. The purpose and method of environmental education are embedded into the protection of rural cultural landscape, and the function of environmental education is added to the protection and management of cultural landscape. The purpose is to realize the humanized protection of rural cultural landscape, and to achieve a comprehensive revitalization of rural culture.

参考文献/References:

[1] 唐晓岚,刘思源.乡村振兴战略下文化景观的研究进路与治理框架[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,46(3):38-44.
[2] 孙彦斐,唐晓岚,刘思源.乡村性设计语汇的景观表达[J].南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计),2018(2):202-204.
[3] 邓运员,杨柳,刘沛林.景观基因视角的湖南省古村镇文化特质及其保护价值[J].经济地理,2011,31(9):1552-1557.
[4] 杨立国,龙花楼,刘沛林,等.传统村落保护度评价体系及其实证研究——以湖南省首批中国传统村落为例[J].人文地理,2018,33(3):121-128.
[5] 孙华.传统村落保护的学科与方法——中国乡村文化景观保护与利用刍议之二[J].中国文化遗产,2015(5):62-70.
[6] 刘沛林.生态博物馆理念及其在少数民族社区景观保护中的作用——以贵州梭嘎生态博物馆为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2005(3):254-257.
[7] 严国泰,马蕊,郑光强.哈尼梯田文化景观世界遗产保护的社区参与研究[J].中国园林,2017,33(4):103-107.
[8] 彭思涛,但文红. 基于社区参与的村落文化景观遗产保护模式研究——以贵州省雷山县控拜社区为例[J]. 原生态民族文化学刊,2009(2):94-98.
[9] 万霞.国际法中"软法"现象探析[J].外交学院学报,2005,22(2):94-99.
[10] 张蕾花,何嵩涛,徐英红,等.注重乡村文化记忆保护与传承的景观设计研究——以贵阳花溪大塘湿地景观设计为例[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,15(3):21-28.
[11] 欧阳勇锋,黄汉莉.试论乡村文化景观的意义及其分类、评价与保护设计[J].中国园林,2012,28(12):105-108.
[12] 吴斐琼, 周珂. 最少干预的规划——以村落文化景观的角度来实践村庄规划[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2015, 30(1):44-49.
[13] 熊星,唐晓岚,叶海跃,等.基于预警策略的传统乡村文化景观保护与安全体系研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(4):646-652.
[14] Grunsel A, Wade R. Environmental Education and Development Education within the Formal Education System[M].London:South Bank University,1997.
[15] 闫守轩.环境教育:涵义、缘起与演进[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2008(2):16-20.
[16] 孙彦斐,唐晓岚,刘思源.乡村振兴背景下的乡村文化景观研究范式更新[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,21(3):99-104.

相似文献/References:

[1]王景新,支晓娟.中国乡村振兴及其地域空间重构——特色小镇与美丽乡村同建振兴乡村的案例、经验及未来[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):17.
　WANG Jingxin,ZHI Xiaojuan.Rural Revitalization in China and its Regional Spatial Reconstruction: Case Study and Prospects of “Building up Characteristic Towns with Beautiful Countryside” to Revitalize Chinese Countryside[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):17.
[2]陈美球,廖彩荣,刘桃菊.乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):27.
　CHEN Meiqiu,LIAO Cairong,LIU Taoju.Rural Revitalization, Collective Economic Organization and Land Use System Innovation: Based on Analysis of Huangxi Village, Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):27.
[3]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):19.
　HE Xuefeng.Some Issues in Rural Thriving Strategy Implementation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):19.
[4]刘祖云,王丹.“乡村振兴”战略落地的技术支持[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):8.
　LIU Zuyun,WANG Dan.The Technical Support for Implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):8.
[5]张艺颉.乡村振兴背景下村民自治制度建设与转型路径研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):47.
　ZHANG Yijie.Villager Self-governance System Construction and Transformation Path under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):47.
[6]王肖芳.农民工返乡创业集群驱动乡村振兴:机理与策略[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):101.
　WANG Xiaofang.A Study of Migrant Workers Returning Home to Start Businesses Cluster Drive Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):101.
[7]张勇.农村宅基地制度改革的内在逻辑、现实困境与路径选择——基于农民市民化与乡村振兴协同视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):118.
　ZHANG Yong.The Internal Logic, Realistic Predicament and Path Choice of the Rural Homestead System Reform: Based on the Coordination Perspective of Peasant’s Citizenship and Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):118.
[8]叶敬忠,张明皓.“小农户”与“小农”之辩——基于“小农户”的生产力振兴和“小农”的生产关系振兴[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):1.
　YE Jingzhong,ZHANG Minghao.Differences Between Smallholders and Peasants: Smallholders Based Vitalization of Productive Forces and Peasants Based Vitalization of Productive Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):1.
[9]吴重庆,张慧鹏.小农与乡村振兴——现代农业产业分工体系中小农户的结构性困境与出路[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):13.
　WU Chongqing,ZHANG Huipeng.Small Farmers and Rural Revitalization: Structural Dilemma and Outlet of Small Farmers in Modern Agricultural Industry Division System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):13.
[10]杜园园.社会经济:发展农村新集体经济的可能路径——兼论珠江三角洲地区的农村股份合作经济[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(02):63.
　DU Yuanyuan.Social Economy: Possible Paths to Develop New Collective Economy in Rural Areas With a Discussion of the Rural Share Cooperation Economy in the Pearl River Delta Region[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):63.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-05-20。
基金项目:南京林业大学专业学位研究生课程案例库建设项目（2018AL07）；南京林业大学高等教育研究课题（2018B22）
作者简介:孙彦斐,男,南京林业大学风景园林学院博士生。
通讯作者:唐晓岚(通信作者),女,南京林业大学风景园林学院教授,博士生导师
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01