[1]彭开丽.“三权”分置背景下农户土地流转决策的形成机理与实证检验——基于湖北省672户农户的调研[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):116-127.
　PENG Kaili.Formation Mechanism and Empirical Study of Farmers’ Land Transfer Decision Under the Background of “Three Rights Separation”Policy: Evidence From Hubei Province with Survey of 672 Farmers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(02):116-127.
点击复制

“三权”分置背景下农户土地流转决策的形成机理与实证检验——基于湖北省672户农户的调研()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
116-127
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2020-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Formation Mechanism and Empirical Study of Farmers’ Land Transfer Decision Under the Background of “Three Rights Separation”Policy: Evidence From Hubei Province with Survey of 672 Farmers
作者:
彭开丽
华中农业大学 土地管理学院/湖北农村发展研究中心, 湖北 武汉 430070
Author(s):
PENG Kaili
关键词:
“三权”分置; 土地流转; 流转决策; 计划行为理论; 结构方程模型
Keywords:
“Three Rights Separation” Policy; Farmland Transfer; Decision on Land Transfer; Theory of Planned Behavior; Structural Equation Modeling
分类号:
F301
摘要:
农地"三权"分置是继家庭联产承包责任制之后农村改革的又一重大制度创新,为剖析该政策背景下农户土地流转决策的形成机理,优化中国现有土地产权制度的激励作用,本文结合湖北省农户调研数据,基于计划行为理论构建"三权"分置背景下农户土地流转决策形成机理的理论分析框架,并运用结构方程模型进行行为态度、知觉行为控制和流转决策3个潜变量、情景因素等19个可观测变量之间的影响路径分析,最后对不同流转主体、流转方式、流转机制和不同试点区域的农户进行多群组对比分析。研究结果表明：①农户的行为态度和知觉行为控制对其流转决策有显著的正向影响。最能反映行为态度、知觉行为控制和流转决策的因子分别是"认为该政策能够稳定土地产权""对政策内涵的了解程度"和"采取主动措施准备土地流转"。②村级土地产权安全性、农户流转经历和主观规范等情景因素对农户土地流转决策既有直接影响,也通过影响行为态度和知觉行为控制对流转决策有间接影响。③"三权"分置背景下农户土地流转决策的形成机理在不同类型农户间存在差异,应针对不同类型农户制定差别化的激励措施,以引导农户进行土地有序流转,提高农地流转效率。并通过积极探索"三权"分置的多种实现形式,激励农户进一步做出帕累托改进的流转决策。
Abstract:
The farmland “three rights separation ” policy which was enacted in 2016 is a totally new land property policy in China. To analyze the influencing mechanism of the policy on farms’ land transfer decision and improve the incentive function of China’s rural land property rights policy, multigroup comparative analysis based on the theory of planned behavior and the method of structural equation modeling is employed in the paper. The results show that:(1) Behavior attitude and perceptual behavior control of farmers have significant positive impact on farmers’ land transfer decision. At the same time, the belief that the policy can stabilize land tenure can best reflect farmers’ behavior attitude. The degree of understanding of policy connotation can best reflect perceptual behavior control. And taking proactive measures to carry out land transfer can best reflect farmers’ transfer decision; (2) Situational factors such as land tenure security, transfer experience, and subjective norms have direct impact on farmers’ land transfer decision, and also have indirect impact on the decision through influencing the behavior attitude and the perceptual behavior control. (3) The formation mechanism of the “three rights separation” policy for farmer’s land transfer decision is various among different transfer subjects, different transfer ways, different transfer mechanisms and different pilot areas. Thus, the theory of planned behavior can explain the influencing mechanism of farmer’s decision on land transfer well. Moreover, incentive measures should have different emphasis on different type farmers to improve the efficiency of farmland transfer, and related laws, regulations and policy measures matched the “three rights separation” policy should be formulated to help farmers make further decision on land transfer.

参考文献/References:

[1] Holden S T, Ghebru H. Land Tenure Reforms, Tenure Security and Food Security in Poor Agrarian Economies: Causal Linkages and Research Gaps[J]. Global Food Security, 2016,10:21-28.
[2] Arnot C N, Luckert M K, Boxall P C. What is Tenure Security? Conceptual Implications for Empirical Analysis [J]. Land Economics, 2011,87(2):297-311.
[3] Ali D A, Deininger K, Goldstein M. Environmental and Gender Impacts of Land Tenure Regularization in Africa: Pilot Evidence from Rwanda[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2014,110:262-275.
[4] Deininger K, Ali A, Alemu T. Impacts of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Investment, and Land Market Participation: Evidence from Ethiopia [J]. land Economics, 2011,87(2):312-334.
[5] Deininger K, Jin S Q. Tenure Security and Land-Related Investment: Evidence from Ethiopia [J]. European Economic Review, 2006,50(5):1245-1277.
[6] Holden S T, Deininger K, Ghebru H. Tenure Insecurity, Gender, Low-cost Land Certification and Land Rental Market Participation in Ethiopia[J]. The Journal of Development Studies, 2011,47(1):31-47.
[7] Beekman G, Bulte E H. Social Norms, Tenure Security and Soil Conservation: Evidence from Burundi[J]. Agricultural System, 2012, 108:50-63.
[8] 刘守英.集体地权制度变迁与农业绩效——中国改革40年农地制度研究综述性评论[J].农业技术经济, 2019(1):4-16.
[9] 朱道林."三权"分置的理论实质与路径[J].改革, 2017(10):115-119.
[10] 陶钟太朗,杨环.农地"三权"分置实质探讨——寻求政策在法律上的妥适表达[J].中国土地科学, 2017,31(1):64-72.
[11] 陈飞,翟伟娟.农户行为视角下农地流转诱因及其福利效应研究[J].经济研究, 2015(10):163-177.
[12] 石敏,李琴.我国农地流转的动因分析——基于广东省的实证研究[J].农业技术经济,2014(1):49-55.
[13] 侯建昀,刘军弟,霍学喜.专业化农户农地流转及其福利效应——基于1079个苹果种植户的实证分析[J].农业技术经济, 2016(3):45-55.
[14] Tan R, Qu F T, Heerink N, et al. Rural to Urban Land Conversion in China-How Large is the Over Conversion and What are its Welfare Implications [J]? China Economic Review, 2011, 22(4):474-484.
[15] Ma X L, Heerink N, Feng S Y, et al. Land Tenure Security and Technical Efficiency: New Insights from a Case Study in Northwest China[J]. Environment & Development Economics, 2017, 22(3):305-327.
[16] Zhou Y P, Shi X P, Heerink N, et al. The Effect of Land Tenure Governance on Technical Efficiency: Evidence from Three Provinces in Eastern China[J]. Applied Economics, 2019,51(22):2337-2354.
[17] 马贤磊,仇童伟,钱忠好.农地产权安全性与农地流转市场的农户参与——基于江苏、湖北、广西、黑龙江四省(区)调查数据的实证分析[J].中国农村经济, 2015,2(4):22-37.
[18] 田传浩,贾生华.农地制度、地权稳定性与农地使用权市场发育:理论与来自苏浙鲁的经验[J].经济研究,2004(1):112-119.
[19] 钟甫宁,纪月清.土地产权、非农就业机会与农户农业生产投资[J].经济研究,2009(12):43-51.
[20] 马贤磊,仇童伟,钱忠好.土地产权经历、产权情景对农民产权安全感知的影响——基于土地法律执行视角[J].公共管理学报,2015(4):111-12.
[21] 韩长赋.土地"三权"分置是中国农村改革的又一次重大创新[N].光明日报, 2016-01-26(1).
[22] 李少武,张衔.三权分置改革中农村土地承包经营权抵押贷款研究[J].重庆社会科学,2019(1):35-43.
[23] Liu C L, Golding D, Gong G. Farmers’ Coping Response to the Low Flows in the Lower Yellow River: a Case Study of Temporal Dimensions of Vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2008, 18(4):543-553.
[24] 高帆.中国农地"三权"分置的形成逻辑与实施政策[J].经济学家,2018(4):86-95.
[25] 陈锡文."三权"分置让农民心里更踏实[N].湖北日报,2017-01-25.
[26] Lopez-Mosquera N, Garcia T, Barrena R. An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Willingness to Pay for the Conservation of an Urban Park[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014,135(15):91-99.
[27] Sanchez-Medina A J, Romero-Quintero L, Sosa-Cabrera S. Environmental Management in Small and Medium-sized Companies: an Analysis from the Perspective of the Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(2):1-12.
[28] 魏凤,于丽卫.农户宅基地换房意愿影响因素分析——基于天津市宝坻区8个乡镇24个自然村的调查[J].农业技术经济,2011(12):79-86.
[29] 高佳,李世平.产权认知、家庭特征与农户土地承包权退出意愿[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015, 15(4):71-78.
[30] 姚柳杨,赵敏娟,徐涛.经济理性还是生态理性?——农户耕地保护的行为逻辑研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(5):86-95.
[31] 吴明隆.结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2017.
[32] 钱忠好,冀县卿.中国农地流转现状及其政策改进——基于江苏、广西、湖北、黑龙江四省(区)调查数据的分析[J].管理世界,2016(2):71-81.
[33] 张建,诸培新.不同农地流转模式对农业生产效率的影响分析——以江苏省四县为例[J].资源科学,2017,39(4):629-640.
[34] 林乐芬,王步天.农户农地经营权抵押贷款可获性及其影响因素——基于农村金融改革试验区2518个农户样本[J]. 中国土地科学,2016,30(5):36-45.

相似文献/References:

[1]冯小.资本下乡的策略选择与资源动用——基于湖北省S镇土地流转的个案分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(01):36.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(02):36.
[2]张海鹏,曲婷婷.农地经营权流转与新型农业经营主体发展[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(05):70.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(02):70.
[3]林乐芬,马艳艳.土地股份化进程中农户行为选择及影响因素分析——基于1007户农户调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(06):70.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(02):70.
[4]徐美银.发达地区农民土地转出意愿影响因素分析——基于浙江省426份调研问卷的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(06):97.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(02):97.
[5]刘锐.土地流转、阶层分化与乡村治理转型——基于湖北省京山J村的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(02):92.
[6]聂建亮,钟涨宝.土地流转的策略选择与资源动用——基于对云南省W村的个案调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(02):101.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(02):101.
[7]翟研宁,梁丹辉.传统农区农户土地转出行为影响因素分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(03):78.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(02):78.
[8]贺雪峰.论中坚农民[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(04):1.
[9]潘俊.农村土地承包权和经营权分离的实现路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(04):98.
[10]韩庆龄.农业经营模式的路径选择:基于村庄基础与农民诉求的双重视角——以江汉平原P村为个案[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(05):95.
　HAN Qingling.Choice of Agriculture Management Model: From Dual Perspectives of Village Foundation and Farmers’ Demands and Based on a Case of Village P in Jianghan Plain[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(02):95.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-19。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目"产权制度激励下农户土地流转决策的形成机理、福利效应与政策供给"（71973050）；教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"农村土地流转中农业转移人口和农民福祉比较与差别化补偿政策研究"（17YJA630075）
作者简介:彭开丽,女,华中农业大学公共管理学院副教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01