[1]李星光,刘军弟,霍学喜.社会信任对农地租赁市场的影响[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):128-139.
 LI Xingguang,LIU Jundi,HUO Xuexi.Impact of Social Trust on Farmland Rental Markets[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(02):128-139.
点击复制

社会信任对农地租赁市场的影响()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
128-139
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2020-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of Social Trust on Farmland Rental Markets
作者:
李星光 刘军弟 霍学喜
西北农林科技大学 西部农村发展研究中心/经济管理学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
LI Xingguang LIU Jundi HUO Xuexi
关键词:
社会信任农地租赁市场制度信任人际信任流转租金流转规模
Keywords:
Social TrustFarmland Rental MarketsInstitutional TrustInterpersonal TrustRentsScale of Farmland Transfer
分类号:
F301.2
摘要:
将社会信任划分为人际信任和制度信任两维度,考察在农地产权缺乏稳定性和农地租赁市场缺乏有效性的情境中,社会信任对农地租赁市场的影响机理及其蕴含的政策建议。本文基于比较静态方法,在界定农地产权风险和社会信任等关键概念的基础上,理论分析社会信任通过稳定农地产权风险预期与降低农地流转交易成本,影响农地流转市场参与、流转租金及流转规模的作用机理,并对762户苹果种植户的调查数据运用线性回归模型进行实证检验。研究结果显示:人际信任、制度信任对培育农地租赁市场具有正向影响。制度信任通过稳定农地产权风险预期,对提高农户参与农地租赁市场具有正向影响;人际信任通过降低农地流转交易成本,对扩大农地流转规模具有正向影响;人际信任通过稳定农地产权风险预期,对形成有偿契约机制具有正向影响。研究结论:在社会信任中,制度信任所表征的农地产权正式制度安排主要影响农地流转的市场主体参与,人际信任所表征的市场交易非正式制度安排主要影响农地流转租金、规模等具体契约的确定。培育农地租赁市场的制度需求在于深化产权改革,提高农地租赁市场效率重在提升市场主体之间的人际信任。本文的研究结论对理解农地租赁市场运行机理、改善农地租赁市场运行效率具有重要意义。
Abstract:
In the context of lack of stability of farmland property rights and ineffective farmland rental markets, this paper analyses the influencing mechanism of social trust on farmland rental markets and its policy suggestion after dividing social trust into institutional trust and interpersonal trust. This paper analyses theoretically the influencing mechanism of social trust on participating in the farmland rental markets, rents and size of farmland transfer by stabilizing the expectation of the risks of property rights and reducing transaction costs based on the comparative static analysis and the key concepts such as the risk of farmland property rights and social trust defined, and the linear regression model and the survey data of 762 apple growers are used for empirical test. The results indicate that: institutional trust and interpersonal trust can positively affect the development of farmland rental markets; from the perspective of the influencing mechanism ①institutional trust can boost farmland transfer by stabilizing the expectation of the risks of property rights; ②interpersonal trust can expand the size of farmland transfer by reducing transaction costs; ③interpersonal trust can affect positively the formation of onerous contracts by stabilizing the expectation of the risks of property rights. Conclusion: In social trust, the institutional trust, which can reflect the formal system of farmland property rights, is the key factor of affecting participating in farmland rental markets, and the interpersonal trust, which can reflect the informal system of market transactions, is the key factor of affecting the specific content of contracts such as rents and size of farmland transfer. The institutional demand of developing rental markets focus on deepening the reform of the system of farmland property rights, and lifting the interpersonal trust among market players is conducive to improving the efficiency of farmland rental markets. The research conclusions in this paper are conducive to understanding the operation mechanism of farmland rental markets and improving the operation efficiency of farmland rental markets.

参考文献/References:

[1] 钱龙,洪名勇,龚丽娟,等.差序格局、利益取向与农户土地流转契约选择[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(12):95-104.
[2] 房莉杰.制度信任的形成过程——以新型农村合作医疗制度为例[J].社会学研究,2009,24(2):130-148.
[3] 罗必良,邹宝玲,何一鸣.农地租约期限的"逆向选择"——基于9省份农户问卷的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2017,261(1):4-17.
[4] 李青乘,仇童伟,李宁.产权情景、社会信任与土地产权的社会认同[J].江海学刊,2016(4):92-99.
[5] 周广肃,谢绚丽,李力行.信任对家庭创业决策的影响及机制探讨[J].管理世界,2015(12):121-129.
[6] Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck H J. Reputation Helps Solve the Tragedy of the Commons[J]. Nature,2002,415(6870):424-426.
[7] Welter F. All You Need is Trust? A Critical Review of the Trust and Entrepreneurship Literature[J]. International Small Business Journal,2012, 30(3):193-212.
[8] Bouma J, Bulte E, Soest D V. Trust and Cooperation: Social Capital and Community Resource Management[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008, 56(2):155-166.
[9] Ng A, Ibrahim M H, Mirakhor A. Does Trust Contribute to Stock Market Development?[J]. Economic Modelling, 2016, 52:239-250.
[10] Ding Z J, Au K, Chiang F. Social Trust and Angel Investors’ Decisions: A Multilevel Analysis Across Nations[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2015, 30(2):307-321.
[11] Knack S, Keefer P. Does Social Capital Have An Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(4):1251-1288.
[12] Tu Q, Erwin B. Trust, Market Participation and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from Rural China [J]. World Development, 2010, 38(8):1179-1190.
[13] Siziba S, Bulte E. Does Market Participation Promote Generalized Trust? Experimental Evidence from Southern Africa[J]. Economics Letters, 2012, 117(1):156-160.
[14] 高虹,陆铭.社会信任对劳动力流动的影响——中国农村整合型社会资本的作用及其地区差异[J].中国农村经济,2010(3):12-24.
[15] 王宇,王士权.社会信任与农村劳动力代际职业流动[J].农业技术经济,2017,271(11):92-103.
[16] 蔡起华,朱玉春.社会信任、关系网络与农户参与农村公共产品供给[J].中国农村经济,2015(7):57-69.
[17] 何可,张俊飚,张露,等.人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿——以农业废弃物资源化为例[J].管理世界,2015(5):75-88.
[18] 周海文,周海川.农户社会信任对土地流转租金的影响——基于CHIP数据的实证分析[J].公共管理学报,2019,16(3):118-130.
[19] Tang L, Ma X L, Zhou Y P, et al. Social Relations, Public Interventions and Land Rent Deviation: Evidence from Jiangsu Province in China[J]. Land Use Policy,2019, 86: 406-420.
[20] Peter Ho.谁是中国土地的拥有者——制度变迁、产权和社会冲突[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014.
[21] 程令国,张晔,刘志彪.农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗?[J].管理世界,2016(1):88-98.
[22] Van Gelder J L. What Tenure Security? The Case for A Tripartite View[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010,27(2), 449-456.
[23] Rao F P, Spoor M, Ma X L, et al. Perceived Land Tenure Security in Rural Xinjiang, China: The Role of Official Land Documents and Trust[J/OL]. China Economic Review, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.03.009.
[24] 李星光,刘军弟,霍学喜.关系网络能促进土地流转吗?——以1050户苹果种植户为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(12):45-53.
[25] 徐秀英,徐畅,李朝柱.关系网络对农户林地流入行为的影响——基于浙江省的调查数据[J].中国农村经济,2018(9):62-78.
[26] 钱龙,钱文荣.社会资本影响农户土地流转行为吗?——基于CFPS的实证检验[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(05):88-99+153-154.
[27] Holden S, Deininger K, Gherbru H. Impact of Land Certification and Land Rental Market Participation in Tigrayregion, Northern Ethiopia[R]. Paper Presented at the Nordic Development Economics Conference in Copenhagen,2007,6.
[28] 马贤磊,仇童伟,钱忠好.农地产权安全性与农地流转市场的农户参与——基于江苏、湖北、广西、黑龙江四省(区)调查数据的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2015(2):22-37.
[29] 王亚楠,纪月清,徐志刚,等.有偿VS无偿:产权风险下农地附加价值与农户转包方式选择[J].管理世界,2015(11):87-94.
[30] Gao L L, Huang J K, Rozelle S. Rental Markets for Cultivated Land and Agricultural Investments in China[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2012, 43(4):391-403.
[31] 陈奕山,钟甫宁,纪月清.为什么土地流转中存在零租金?——人情租视角的实证分析[J].中国农村观察,2017(4):43-56.
[32] 罗必良,李尚蒲.农地流转的交易费用:威廉姆森分析范式及广东的证据[J].农业经济问题,2010(12):30-40.
[33] 侯建昀,霍学喜.高价值农产品流通渠道的关键问题与政策导向[J].中国流通经济,2015,29(5):27-33.
[34] 侯建昀,刘军弟,霍学喜.专业化农户农地流转及其福利效应——基于1079个苹果种植户的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2016,251(3):45-55.

相似文献/References:

[1]蔡起华,朱玉春.社会信任、收入水平与农村公共产品农户参与供给[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(01):41.
[2]蔡起华,朱玉春.社会信任、收入水平与农村公共产品农户参与供给[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(01):0.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(02):0.
[3]蔡起华,朱玉春.社会信任、收入水平与农村公共产品农户参与供给[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(01):0.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(02):0.
[4]孙鹏飞,赵凯.社会资本对农户宅基地退出行为的影响——基于安徽省金寨县的调研数据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(05):128.
 SUN Pengfei,ZHAO Kai.Effect of Social Capital on Farmers’ Behavior of Quitting Rural Residential Land: A Case of 606 Farmers’ Samples in Jinzhai County, Anhui Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(02):128.
[5]赵清军,何军.文化差异会影响农业转移人口城市融入吗?——基于多层线性模型的实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(02):155.
 ZHAO Qingjun,HE Jun.Does Cultural Differences Affect the Urban Integration of Rural Migrants? Based on Multilevel Model Empirical Research[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(02):155.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-19。
基金项目:现代农业产业技术体系建设项目专项资助"中国苹果产业经济研究"(CARS-28)
作者简介:李星光,男,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院博士生;刘军弟,男,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院副教授,硕士生导师。
通讯作者:霍学喜(通信作者),男,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01