[1]黄砺,姚钰洁.新时代农村集体建设用地入市模式研究:基于交易费用视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(01):85-94.
　HUANG Li,YAO Yujie.On the Market Entry Mode of Rural Collective Construction Land in theNew Era of China: Based on the Perspective of Transaction Cost[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(01):85-94.
点击复制

新时代农村集体建设用地入市模式研究:基于交易费用视角()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
85-94
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2020-12-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Market Entry Mode of Rural Collective Construction Land in theNew Era of China: Based on the Perspective of Transaction Cost
作者:
黄砺1;  姚钰洁2
1. 中国地质大学 管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074;
2. 中建一局一公司,上海 200000
Author(s):
HUANG Li1;  YAO Yujie2
关键词:
"三块地"改革; 集体建设用地; 入市模式; 交易费用
Keywords:
Three Types of Land Reform; Collective Construction Land; Market Entry Mode; Transaction Cost
分类号:
F301
摘要:
打破地类限制、创设综合地类、扩大入市范围、统筹推进集体经营性建设用地与宅基地入市，已成为现阶段农村土地改革的重要任务之一。在这一背景下，先后出现了湄潭县的"分割登记"模式、义乌市的"集地券"模式与佛山市南海区的"土地整备"模式等推进宅基地与集体经营性建设用地统筹入市的创新性改革模式。本文在"交易-关键交易属性-交易费用-治理结构选择"的分析框架下，选择区位条件、成本-收益不确定性、交易规模、交易主体数量、交易主体异质性和交易频率等六个关键交易属性，分析了上述三种入市模式各自的适用条件。研究结论表明，上述三种入市模式都是从自身的特定条件出发，为了最小化交易费用而选取的模式；各个入市模式本身并无优劣之分，只是其各自适用的条件有所不同。在深化农村土地制度改革的过程中，应保持足够的历史耐心，充分尊重基层的首创精神，鼓励地方因地制宜、因时制宜和因人制宜地探索符合自身实际情况的入市模式。
Abstract:
To break the restrictions on land types, create comprehensive land types, expand the market entry scope, and coordinate the advance of collectively-operated construction land and homestead has become one of the important tasks in the rural land reform at the present stage. In this context, there have been some innovative reform models to promote the integration of homestead and collective business construction land into the market, such as ‘divisional registration’ mode in Meitan County, ‘land voucher’ mode in Yiwu City, and ‘land preparation’ mode in Nanhai District. Based on the analysis framework of "Transaction-Key Transaction Attribute-Transaction Cost-Governance Structure Selection", this paper selects 6 key transaction attributes including location conditions, cost-benefit uncertainty, transaction scale, the number of transaction subjects, the heterogeneity of transaction subjects, and transaction frequency to analyze the respective applicable conditions of the above three market entry modes. The research results show that the above three modes are based on their own specific conditions and are selected to minimize transaction costs. There is no difference between the advantages and disadvantages of each mode, but their applicable conditions are different. In the process of deepening the reform of rural land system, we should maintain enough historical patience, fully respect the initiative of the grassroots, and encourage local governments to explore the market entry mode in line with their own actual conditions.

参考文献/References:

[1] Huang L. From Benign Unconstitutionality to Delegated Legislation:Analysis on the Ways for Legal Reform of China Rural Collective Construction Land Circulation[J]. Habitat International,2018,10(4):626-646.
[2] 唐健,谭荣.农村集体建设用地入市路径——基于几个试点地区的观察[J].中国人民大学学报,2019,33(1):13-22.
[3] 严金明,陈昊,夏方舟.深化农村"三块地"改革:问题、要义和取向[J].改革,2018(5):48-55.
[4] 陈小君. 宅基地使用权的制度困局与破解之维[J].法学研究,2019(3):48-72.
[5] 高圣平,刘守英.集体建设用地进入市场:现实与法律困境[J].管理世界,2007(3):62-72.
[6] Wang Q, Zhang X, Wu Y, et al. Collective Land System in China:Congenital Flaw or Acquired Irrational Weakness?[J].Habitat International,2015(50):226-233.
[7] 周应恒,刘余. 集体经营性建设用地入市实态:由农村改革试验区例证[J].改革,2018(2):54-63.
[8] 沈国明,关涛,谭荣,等. 农村土地制度改革:浙江故事[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.
[9] 鲍建平.义乌"集地券"管理制度的探索与实践[J].中国土地,2018(3):41-43.
[10] 陈海素,谢建春,陈凯.构建农村集体土地整备制度的思考——以广东省佛山市南海区为例[J].中国土地,2017(2):44-45.
[11] Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M].New York:Frees Press,1985.
[12] Tan R,Heerink N. Public and Self-Organized Land Readjustment in Rural China-A Comparison[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2017,53:45-57.
[13] 谭荣,曲福田. 中国农地发展权之路:治理结构改革代替产权结构改革[J].管理世界,2010(6):56-64.
[14] 江华,梁伟健.被征地农民的合法权益及保护研究[J]. 农业经济与管理,2011(5):56-60.
[15] 陈会广,陈利根,马秀鹏,等.农村集体建设用地流转模式的多样化创新——基于政府与市场关系的视角[J]. 经济体制改革,2009(1):87-92.
[16] 张文律.我国集体建设用地流转驱动模式研究[J]. 西部论坛,2011,21(6):16-20.
[17] 黄贤金. 论构建城乡统一的建设用地市场体系——兼论"同地、同权、同价、同责"的理论圈层特征[J]. 中国土地科学,2019,33(8):1-7.

相似文献/References:

[1]龙开胜.集体建设用地指标交易能否增加农民收入——一个整体性框架及初步经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(05):87.
　LONG Kaisheng.Does Collective Construction Land Quota Transaction Increase Peasants’ Income? An Integrated Framework and Preliminary Empirical Evidences[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(01):87.
[2]唐浩,张聪.土地制度应对农村人口老龄化：挑战与思路[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(04):34.
　TANG Hao,ZHANG Cong.How does Land System Cope with Ageing of Rural China?[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(01):34.
[3]刘灵辉,张迎新,邱晓艳.集体建设用地建设租赁住房能促进住房租赁市场规模扩大吗？——基于35个大中城市的多期DID模型的评估[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(06):159.
　LIU Linghui,ZHANG Yingxin,QIU Xiaoyan.Can the Construction of Rental Housing on Collective Construction Land Promote the Expansion of the Housing Rental Market? Evaluation of TV-DID Model Based on 35 Medium and Large Cities[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(01):159.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-09-14。
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"乡村振兴背景下集体经营性建设用地入市模式研究"（19YJC790040）
作者简介:黄砺,男,中国地质大学管理学院讲师;姚钰洁,女,中建一局一公司。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01