[1]沈费伟,杜芳.数字乡村治理的限度与优化策略——基于治理现代化视角的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(04):134-144.
 SHEN Feiwei,DU Fang.Governance Limits and Optimization Strategies of Digital Countryside: From the Perspective of Governance Modernization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(04):134-144.
点击复制

数字乡村治理的限度与优化策略——基于治理现代化视角的考察()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
134-144
栏目:
乡村治理现代化
出版日期:
2022-07-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Governance Limits and Optimization Strategies of Digital Countryside: From the Perspective of Governance Modernization
作者:
沈费伟 杜芳
杭州师范大学 公共管理学院, 浙江 杭州 311121
Author(s):
SHEN Feiwei DU Fang
关键词:
数字乡村治理限度治理现代化数字技术乡村振兴
Keywords:
Digital CountrysideGovernance LimitsModernization Of GovernanceDigital TechnologyRural Revitalization
分类号:
D616
摘要:
数字乡村是实现乡村振兴的重要途径,是建设数字中国的关键内容。立足国家大力建设数字乡村的时代背景,从治理现代化视角出发,深入剖析数字乡村治理的有限性。研究发现,数字乡村治理现代化体现为底层维护、技术赋能、服务共享和伦理保障的运作逻辑,推动乡村治理达到全局性、整体性和系统性的现代化样态。但由于数字技术运用边界的模糊,难以平衡简约治理与复杂治理的矛盾、工具理性与价值理性的张力、技术安排与制度安排的困境、权力意志与民本意志的冲突,致使数字乡村治理存在一定的局限性。为有效发挥数字技术在乡村治理中的优势价值,未来需要契合乡村空间场域、合理划分技术类型、重塑组织制度结构以及回应村民切实需求,从而更好地保障数字乡村的治理适应性、匹配度、有效性以及价值性,最终实现数字乡村的治理现代化目标。
Abstract:
Digital village is an important way to realize rural revitalization and the keyobjective of building digital China. Based on the background of national efforts to build digital villages, this study delves into the governance limits of digital villages from the perspective of governance modernization. It is found that the modernization of digital rural governance embodies the operation logic of bottom maintenance, technology empowerment, service sharing and ethical guarantee, promotes the modernization of rural governance to achieve the overall and systematic state. But because of the fuzzy boundary of digital technology application, it is difficult to balance the contradiction of contracted management and complex management, the tension of instrumental rationality and value rationality, the dilemma of technical arrangement and institutional arrangement and the conflict between the will to power and will to people, resulting in the governance modernization limit of digital countryside. To give an effective play to the advantages of digital technology in the rural governance value in the future, we need to fit the country space field, divide technology types reasonably, reshape organization system structure as well as the response to the villagers’ real demands, so as to better guarantee the adaptability, matching, effectiveness and value of the governance of digital countryside, and finally realize the digital village management modernization goals.

参考文献/References:

[1] 胡卫卫,陈建平,赵晓峰.技术赋能何以变成技术负能?——"智能官僚主义"的生成及消解[J].电子政务,2021(4):58-67.
[2] 陈潭.国家治理的大数据赋能:向度与限度[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2021,27(5):133-143.
[3] 黄徐强,张勇杰.技术治理驱动的社区协商:效果及其限度——以第一批"全国社区治理和服务创新实验区"为例[J].中国行政管理,2020(8):45-51.
[4] 阙天舒,吕俊延.智能时代下技术革新与政府治理的范式变革——计算式治理的效度与限度[J].中国行政管理,2021(2):21-30.
[5] Warren M.The Digital Vicious Cycle:Links between Social Disadvantage and Digital Exclusion in Rural Areas[J].Telecommunications Policy,2007,31(6/7):374-388.
[6] Li R P,Chen K,Wu D.Challenges and Opportunities for Coping with the Smart Divide in Rural America[J].Annals of the American Association of Geographers,2020, 110(2):559-570.
[7] 王利平,黄鹂.乡村场域中技术赋权的"双刃剑"效应与优化治理[J].领导科学,2021(16):38-41.
[8] 吕普生.数字乡村与信息赋能[J].中国高校社会科学,2020(2):69-79.
[9] Vaishar A,?t’astná M.Smart Village and Sustainability.Southern Moravia Case Study[J].European Countryside,2019,11(4):651-660.
[10] Atieno L V,Moturi C A.Implementation of Digital Village Projects in Developing Countries-case of Kenya[J].British Journal of Applied Science&Technology,2014,4(5):793-807.
[11] 戈大专,龙花楼.论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展[J].地理学报,2020,75(6):1272-1286.
[12] 罗荣渠.现代化新论:中国的现代化之路[M].增订本.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2013:3.
[13] 埃米尔·涂尔干.社会分工论[M].渠敬东,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2000:73-92.
[14] 约翰逊.社会学理论[M].南开大学社会学系,译.北京:国际文化出版公司,1988:510-520.
[15] 艾森斯塔特.现代化:抗拒与变迁[M].张旅平,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998:49.
[16] 塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].王冠华,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008:366-367.
[17] Arnstein S R.A Ladder of Citizen Participation[J].Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1969,35(4):216-224.
[18] Margarian A.A Constructive Critique of the Endogenous Development Approach in the European Support of Rural Areas[J].Growth and Change,2013,44(1):1-29.
[19] 约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].修订版.何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009:58.
[20] 沈费伟.数字乡村的内生发展模式:实践逻辑、运作机理与优化策略[J].电子政务,2021(10):57-67.
[21] 布莱恩·阿瑟.技术的本质:技术是什么,它是如何进化的[M].曹东溟,王建,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2014:5.
[22] 道格拉斯·诺思.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1994:3.
[23] 渠敬东,周飞舟,应星.从总体支配到技术治理——基于中国30年改革经验的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学,2009(6):104-127.
[24] 罗伯特·B.登哈特.公共组织理论[M].项龙,刘俊生,译.北京:华夏出版社,2002:9.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨嵘均,操远芃.论乡村数字赋能与数字鸿沟间的张力及其消解[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(05):31.
 YANG Rongjun,CAO Yuanpeng.On the Tension between Rural Digital Empowerment and Digital Divide and Its Resolution[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(04):31.
[2]沈费伟,叶温馨.数字乡村建设:实现高质量乡村振兴的策略选择[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(05):41.
 SHEN Feiwei,YE Wenxin.Digital Rural Construction: A Strategic Choice to Realize the Revitalization of High-quality Rural Areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(04):41.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-01-17。
基金项目:中国博士后科学基金项目"’十四五’时期推进长三角地区数字乡村治理研究"(2021M702796);浙江省软科学项目"科技创新助推浙江数字乡村发展的路径选择与政策研究"(2021C25020)
作者简介:沈费伟,男,杭州师范大学公共管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,浙江省高校青年领军人才,浙江省之江青年社科学者;杜芳,女,杭州师范大学公共管理学院硕士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01