[1]李增元,尹延君.现代化进程中的农村社区风险及其治理[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):81-92.
　LI Zengyuan,YIN Yanjun.Rural Community Risk in the Process of Modernization and Its Governance[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(02):81-92.
点击复制

现代化进程中的农村社区风险及其治理()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
81-92
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2020-04-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rural Community Risk in the Process of Modernization and Its Governance
作者:
李增元;  尹延君
曲阜师范大学 政治与公共管理学院, 山东 日照 276826
Author(s):
LI Zengyuan;  YIN Yanjun
关键词:
农村社区风险; 风险治理; 治理体系
Keywords:
Rural Community Risk; Risk Governance; Governance System
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
作为广大居民日常生活居住、生产发展的重要载体,农村社区是各种风险的频发地和聚集地。在农村社区治理现代化实践探索过程中,居民生存发展、社会稳定、经济运行、权力运行、财务运行、突发性公共事件等都给广大社会居民带来各种风险。这些风险不仅制约着社区居民日益增长的美好生活需要的满足,同时也影响基层社会和谐与基层政权稳定,阻碍国家治理现代化目标的实现。总体上来看,传统经济发展统辖社会治理的理念、"应付"治理思维逻辑与事权下放和财权收紧的制度设计、市场优化配置资源与特殊性社会生产要素的运行制度、强化治理理念与外强中干的基层政权运转制度是农村社区多重风险并存的重要原因,深层次原因体现为在国家治理现代化的具体实践中长期存在偏差的"理念—制度"治理逻辑。在现代化发展进程中,如何夯实国家治理现代化基础,保持基层社会稳定与有效治理,不断满足社区居民日益增长的美好生活需要,实现乡村善治目标,需要转变治理理念,重构现代新型农村基层治理体系,从而有效规避农村社区风险、推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化进程。
Abstract:
In the process of human history development, we are always facing all kinds of risks and challenges. In fact, the process of modern social development is also a process in which people continue to pursue progress and try their best to avoid all kinds of risks to human beings. As an important carrier of daily life and production development, rural community is a frequent place and gathering place for all kinds of risks. In the process of exploring the modernization practice of rural community governance, residents face various risks in terms of survival and development, social stability, economic operation, power operation, financial operation, public emergency and so on. These risks not only restrict the satisfaction of the growing needs of community residents for a better life, but also affect the grass-roots community. It will be harmonious and stable at the grass-roots level, hindering the realization of the goal of modernization of national governance. Generally speaking, the concept of traditional economic development governing social governance, the system design of dealing with the logic of governance thinking and the decentralization of administrative power and the tightening of financial power, the optimal allocation of resources and the operation system of special social factors of production in the market, and the strengthening of the concept of governance and the operation system of grass-roots political power in rural communities are the important reasons for the coexistence of multiple risks in rural communities. It is embodied in the governance logic of “concept-system”, which has been deviated for a long time in the concrete practice of the modernization of national governance. How to consolidate the foundation of modernization of national governance and maintain the foundation in the process of modernization development in order to avoid the risk of the rural community and to advance the modernization of the country’s governance, the social stability and effective governance of the layer, constantly satisfy the growing good living needs of the community residents, and realize the goal of rural good governance, we need to change the governance concept and reconstruct the modern new rural grass-roots governance system, thus effectively avoiding the risk of the rural communities and promoting the modernization process of the national governance.

参考文献/References:

[1] Ulrich Beck. World Risk Society[M]. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1999.
[2] Zygmunt Bauman. Liquid Life[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005.
[3] Zygmunt Bauman. In Search of Politics[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
[4] Michael Mandel. The High—Risk Society: Peril and Promise in the New Economy[M]. New York: Times Business, 1996.
[5] 张永理,徐浩.改革开放以来我国乡村社区风险变化研究[J].马克思主义与现实,2014(6):65-68.
[6] Ulrich Beck. Conversation with Ulrich Beck[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.
[7] 詹承豫.转型期中国的风险特征及其有效治理——以环境风险治理为例[J].马克思主义与现实,2014(6):59.
[8] 刘玉蓉.论城市外来工聚居社区社会风险生成逻辑[J].求索,2013(1):214-215.
[9] 朱华桂.论风险社会中的社区抗逆力问题[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学版),2012(5):51.
[10] 刘佳燕,沈毓颖.面向风险治理的社区韧性研究[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(12):91.
[11] 张永理,徐浩.改革开放以来我国乡村社区风险变化研究[J].马克思主义与现实,2014(6):69.
[12] 乌尔里希贝克.世界风险社会[M].吴英姿,孙淑敏,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004.
[13] 俞正梁.全球化时代的国际关系[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2000.
[14] 虞新胜."人与自然和谐共生"何以可能[J].齐鲁学刊,2019(5):64.
[15] 张明军,刘晓亮.2016年中国社会群体性事件分析报告[R].中国社会公共安全研究报告,2017(10):4.
[16] 温铁军.中国新农村建设报告[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2010.
[17] 袁淮.中国共产党执政风险防范研究[M].北京:中国书籍出版社,2012.
[18] Ulrich Beck. Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity[M]. California: Sage Publication, 1986.
[19] 马光选,刘强.风险制约型集体腐败的生成机制与治理路径[J].广东行政学院学报,2018,30(3):16.
[20] 景跃进.村民自治的空间拓展及其问题[J].教学与研究,2001(5):21.
[21] 田孟.新村级债务的形成机制及其破解之道——基于全国6省11村的调查[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(1):6.
[22] 刘祖云.社会转型:一种特定的社会发展过程[J].华中师范法学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,36(6):37.
[23] 宋鑫华.核心政治:当代中国国家治理的制度逻辑[J].学术论坛,2015(8):16.
[24] 周雪光,艾云.多重逻辑下的制度变迁:一个分析框架[J].中国社会科学,2010(4):132.
[25] 李齐,李欢欢.乡村治理中地方政府行为逻辑的重构[J].理论探讨,2017(6):19.
[26] 刘祖云.社会转型问题解读[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2005.
[27] 崔德华.风险社会理论与我国社会主义和谐社会构建研究[M].济南:山东大学出版社,2013.
[28] 田润宇.当代中国地方政府行为模式分析[J].行政与法,2010(5):10.
[29] 周飞舟.锦标赛体制[J].社会学研究,2009(3):55.
[30] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[31] 陈科霖.纵向府际关系视域下的中国国家治理研究:进路与比较[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2018(5):68.
[32] 李增元,王岩.农村生态社区建设:现实问题与破解思路[J].中国福建省委党校学报,2017(1):103.
[33] 崔德华.风险社会理论与我国社会主义和谐社会构建研究[M].济南:山东大学出版社,2013.
[34] 黄浩明.建立自治法治德治的基层社会治理模式[J].行政管理改革,2018(3):43.
[35] 廖峻岩,刘海峰.关于风险社会背景下的社区治理思考[J].东华大学学报(社会科学版),2015,15(3):155.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-12-29。
基金项目:泰山学者工程专项经费资助项目"中国特色社会主义乡村振兴战略中的乡村治理新体系研究"（tsqn201909105）；山东省社会科学规划重点项目"新时代农村现代化中的社区治理体系现代化研究"（18BXSXJ17）
作者简介:李增元,男,曲阜师范大学政治与公共管理学院教授,博士生导师;尹延君,男,曲阜师范大学政治与公共管理学院硕士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01