[1]刘轩,刘祖云,杜焱强.乡村韧性:一个新的学术议题的理论审思[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(02):39-51.
　LIU Xuan,LIU Zuyun,DU Yanqiang.Rural Resilience: A Theoretical Reflection on a New Academic Issue[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(02):39-51.
点击复制

乡村韧性:一个新的学术议题的理论审思()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
25
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
39-51
栏目:
乡村社会发展
出版日期:
2025-04-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rural Resilience: A Theoretical Reflection on a New Academic Issue
作者:
刘轩;  刘祖云;  杜焱强
南京农业大学 公共管理学院, 南京 210095
Author(s):
LIU Xuan;  LIU Zuyun;  DU Yanqiang
关键词:
乡村韧性; 理论审思; 三维框架; 气候变化; 可持续发展
Keywords:
Rural Resilience; Theoretical Reflection; Three-dimensional Framework; Climate Change; Sustainable Development
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
乡村韧性是全球应对气候变化和推动可持续发展的关键举措,也是推进中国式农业农村现代化、促进乡村高质量发展的时代议题。本文基于背景、结构与策略的认知理路,从环境、系统、行动三个维度出发,构建"环境风险-系统资源-主体行动"的分析框架,深入阐释乡村韧性的核心要义和演化逻辑,力图揭示乡村韧性在复杂环境中生成发展的本质规律。从环境维度看,乡村韧性在环境风险作为触发条件的动态进程中被建构起来,契合了乡村应对环境风险的历史、理论与现实三重逻辑;从系统维度看,乡村韧性生成于作为复杂适应系统的乡村,由环境、经济和社会三类系统资源构成,并在"涟漪效应"和"锁定效应"的互动过程中,影响自身的生成与演化;从行动维度看,乡村韧性需依托"党-社-农"三角互嵌结构,在多主体的统合互动中,通过适应、恢复、协调和变革四类行动,维持乡村系统的平衡与稳定。乡村韧性作为风险社会中应对不确定性的核心能力,唯有深刻把握环境、系统与行动之间的理论张力,才能充分释放乡村发展潜力,进而推动乡村全面振兴。
Abstract:
Rural resilience is a pivotal strategy in the global response to climate change and the advancement of sustainable development, as well as a critical factor in propelling China’s rural modernization and nurturing high-quality rural development. Drawing upon the cognitive framework of background, structure, and strategy, this paper constructs an analytical framework of "Environmental Risk-System Capital-Subject Action" across the environmental, systemic, and behavioral dimensions, offering a profound explanation of the core principles and evolutionary logic underpinning rural resilience. The objective is to uncover the intrinsic patterns of rural resilience in its emergence and progression within complex environmental contexts. From the environmental perspective, rural resilience is constructed through a dynamic process spurred by environmental risks, aligning with the historical, theoretical, and practical responses of rural areas to such risks. In the systemic dimension, rural resilience emerges within rural systems as complex adaptive systems, comprising environmental, economic, and social resources that interact through "ripple effects" and "lock-in effects," influencing their own formation and evolution. From the action dimension, rural resilience relies on the "Party-Society-Farmer" embedded structure, where the interactions of multiple actors through adaptation, recovery, coordination, and transformation actions sustain the equilibrium and stability of rural systems. As the core capacity to navigate uncertainty in risk societies, rural resilience can only fully tap into the developmental potential of rural areas by deeply comprehending the theoretical interplay between environment, system, and action, thereby achieving prosperity and contributing to the comprehensive revitalization of rural communities.

参考文献/References:

[1] 芭芭拉·亚当,乌尔里希·贝克,约斯特·房·龙.风险社会及其超越:社会理论的关键议题[M].赵延东,马缨,译.北京:北京出版社,2005:1.
[2] 郭晓鸣,吕卓凡,周小娟.整体性治理与乡村韧性发展: 一个"四维" 理论分析框架[J].社会科学研究, 2024(4):13-22.
[3] Bacon F. New Atlantis and Selections from the Sylva Sylvarum[M]. London: Watkins Media & Repeater Books (Publishers), 2020: 140.
[4] 买欣,陶伟,刘望保.国内外乡村韧性研究进展评述[J].人文地理,2023(2):28-34.
[5] 杨新军,石育中,王子侨.道路建设对秦岭山区社会-生态系统的影响——一个社区恢复力的视角[J].地理学报,2015(8): 1313-1326.
[6] 张震,唐文浩.韧性治理共同体: 面向突发公共风险的乡村治理逻辑[J].南京社会科学,2022(10): 54-62.
[7] 陈桂生,彭俊杰.基于社会系统论的数字乡村韧性治理[J].理论探索,2024(2):64-70.
[8] 姜国俊,袁赞.找回群众与双向赋能:党建引领乡村治理有效的韧性机制——基于C村美丽屋场建设的个案考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024(1): 118-131.
[9] 资明贵,周怡,罗静,等.山区乡村地域系统韧性测度及影响因素研究——以大别山区罗田县为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2022(10): 1819-1832.
[10] Cutter S L,Barnes L,Berry M,et al. A Place Based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2008(4): 598-606.
[11] 马世俊,王如松.社会—经济—自然复合生态系统理论[J].生态学报,1984(1):1-9.
[12] Gunderson L H. Adaptive Dancing: Interactions between Social Resilience and Ecological Crises[M]//Navigating Social-ecological Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 33-52.
[13] Walker B H, Salt D. Resilience Thinking Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World[M].Washington,D.C.: Island Press, 2006.
[14] 马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:545.
[15] Kelly C,Ferrara A,Wilson G A, et al.Community Resilience and Land Degradation in Forest and Shrubland Social-ecological Systems: Evidence from Gorgoglione, Basilicata, Italy[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 46: 11-20.
[16] O’Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B. Taking the Naturalness out of Natural Disasters[J]. Nature, 1976, 260: 566-567.
[17] 刘轩,刘祖云,杜焱强.从发现到超越:西方乡村发展思想的理论脉络与研究展望[J].地理研究,2024(11): 2989-3006.
[18] Adger W N, Hughes T P, Folke C, et al. Social-ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters[J]. Science, 2005(5737): 1036-1039.
[19] 郑红娥,武晋,李小云.风险社会背景下农村突发性事件的风险叙事:暗喻、隐患与应对——以禽流感事件为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1): 9-21.
[20] 郭洪水, 朱葆伟. 风险的哲学存在论分析——兼论当代风险社会的生成逻辑[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2013(3): 99-103.
[21] 约翰·霍兰. 隐秩序:适应性造就复杂性[M].周晓牧,韩晖, 译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000: 154-157.
[22] Holland J H. Complex Systems[M]//Complexity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2014.
[23] 范冬萍,黄键.当代系统观念与系统科学方法论的发展[J].自然辩证法研究,2021(11):9-14.
[24] 埃德加·莫兰.方法: 天然之天性[M].吴泓缈, 冯学俊,译.北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002: 136,209.
[25] 乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M]. 何博闻,译.南京:译林出版社,2004:36.
[26] Castro-arce K,Vanclay F.Transformative Social Innovation for Sustainable Rural Development: An Analytical Framework to Assist Community-based Initiatives[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2020,74:45-54.
[27] 塔尔科特·帕森斯.社会行动的结构[M].张明德,夏翼南,彭刚,译.南京:译林出版社,2003:48-56.
[28] 刘祖云,李烊.元治理视角下"过渡型社区"治理的结构与策略[J].社会科学,2017(1):11-20.
[29] 贝尔特,席尔瓦.二十世纪以来的社会理论[M].瞿铁鹏,译.北京:商务印书馆,2014: 85-86.
[30] 山形与志树,谢里菲.韧性城市规划的理论与实践[M].曹琦,师满江,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2020:6-7.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-7-10。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目"农村人居环境整治的协同增效机理及调控路径研究"(42371305)
作者简介:刘轩,男,南京农业大学公共管理学院博士生;刘祖云,男,南京农业大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师;杜焱强(通信作者),男,南京农业大学公共管理学院副教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01