[1]张兆亮,黄建伟,邹伟.“资源-价值”视角下“以宅兴业”的联动效应与多元路径研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(05):39-51.
　ZHANG Zhaoliang,HUANG Jianwei,ZOU Wei.Research on the Linkage Effect and Multiple Paths of Home-based Industry Development from the Perspective of "Resources-Value"[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(05):39-51.
点击复制

“资源-价值”视角下“以宅兴业”的联动效应与多元路径研究()

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
25
期数:
2025年05期
页码:
39-51
栏目:
乡村振兴的理论与实践
出版日期:
2025-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Linkage Effect and Multiple Paths of Home-based Industry Development from the Perspective of "Resources-Value"
作者:
张兆亮1;  黄建伟2;  邹伟1
1. 南京农业大学 公共管理学院, 南京 210095;
2. 南京财经大学 公共管理学院, 南京 210023
Author(s):
ZHANG Zhaoliang1;  HUANG Jianwei2;  ZOU Wei1
关键词:
闲置宅基地; 乡村产业; 组态路径; 价值共创
Keywords:
Idle House Land; Rural Industry; Configuration Path; Value Co-creation
分类号:
F301.2
摘要:
闲置宅基地盘活利用是实现乡村产业振兴的重要突破口。基于乡村发展的现实情境,从"资源-价值"视角构建分析框架,利用中国土地经济调查(CLES)2021年"村庄问卷"数据,运用定性比较分析方法,探析村庄资源环境与多主体价值共创机制对闲置宅基地盘活利用发展乡村产业的联动效应与多元路径。研究发现:"以宅兴业"是乡村内外部资源组合式激活,多主体价值共创的结果,单一因素并非其必要条件;不同类型乡村的驱动路径不尽相同,可归纳为城郊融合型、特色保护型和集聚提升型三条产业发展路径,具有"殊途同归"的特点。三条组态路径的核心条件均是较高的地方政府财政支持能力、管理服务能力以及村集体组织管理能力,即地方政府与村集体行为能力的有效发挥及联动效应的形成,是各类乡村"以宅兴业"成败的关键。本文从组态视角系统阐释"以宅兴业"的多元驱动路径,在一定程度上推动该领域从单一权变向整体多维视角的研究范式转变,为乡村"以宅兴业"实践提供理论指导和实践启示。
Abstract:
The proactive utilization of idle housing land represents a critical breakthrough for revitalizing rural industries. Considering the realities of rural development, this paper constructs an analytical framework from the "resource-value" perspective and employs data from the 2021 China Land Economic Survey (CLES) "Village Questionnaire" to examine the linkage effects and multiple pathways through which village resource environments and multi-agent value co-creation mechanisms influence the revitalization and utilization of idle residential land for rural industrial development using qualitative comparative analysis. The findings indicate that "building a business by house" results from the synergistic activation of both internal and external rural resources and the co-creation of multi-subject values, with no single factor being a necessary condition. Different types of villages exhibit distinct driving paths, which can be categorized into three primary industrial development models: suburban integration, characteristic protection, and agglomeration promotion, all converging towards a common goal. The core conditions for these three configuration paths include robust local government financial support, management service capabilities, and village collective organization and management abilities. In other words, the effective synergy between local government and village collective actions is crucial for the success of various forms of rural "development by house". From a configurational perspective, this paper systematically elucidates the multiple driving forces behind "home development",promoting a paradigm shift in research from singular transient changes to a comprehensive multi-dimensional approach, thereby providing theoretical guidance and practical insights for rural "home development" initiatives.

参考文献/References:

[1] 曹守慧,孙飞,丁士军.宅基地流转对居民家庭消费的影响研究[J].农业技术经济,2023(1):17-31.
[2] 郭恩泽,吴一恒,王博,等.如何促进宅基地"三权分置"有效实现——基于产权配置形式与实施机制视角[J].农业经济问题,2022(6):57-67.
[3] 曲颂,仲鹭勍,郭君平.宅基地制度改革的关键问题:实践解析与理论探释[J].中国农村经济,2022(12):73-89.
[4] 钱文荣,朱嘉晔,钱龙,等.中国农村土地要素市场化改革探源[J].农业经济问题,2021(2):4-14.
[5] 唐丽霞,刘浩然.农村闲置宅基地有效利用:动力基础与实现路径——基于昆明市乡村振兴试验区Y村的观察[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023(2):132-143.
[6] 李卓,刘天军,郭占锋,等.乡村走向全面振兴过程中的多元组织机制及其制度逻辑——基于陕西省袁家村的经验研究[J].农业经济问题,2023(8):1-14.
[7] 徐忠国,卓跃飞,陈阳,等.农村闲置宅基地盘活利用的多主体行为逻辑——以杭州临安为案例[J].中国土地科学,2024(1):105-113.
[8] 陆进锋,仝德,龙嘉骞,等.县域城乡融合发展与宅基地制度改革:理论逻辑及实现路径[J].自然资源学报,2023(8):2135-2147.
[9] 曲海燕,张斌,王真.村企合作助力乡村振兴的典型模式与风险防范[J].改革,2023(6):95-104.
[10] 林彩云,梁发超."三权分置"下农村宅基地盘活利用的赋权实践及振兴路径——基于晋江市典型村庄的实证分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023(5):67-76.
[11] 乔陆印.乡村振兴村庄类型识别与振兴策略研究——以山西省长子县为例[J].地理科进展,2019(9):1340-1348.
[12] 刘法威.城乡融合背景下传统农区宅基地治理的动力与路径选择[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2022(6):111-121.
[13] 董保宝.创业研究在中国:回顾与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2014(1):73-81.
[14] 杨青贵.适度放活宅基地使用权的理论逻辑与实现进路[J].农业经济问题,2023(7):64-75.
[15] 何龙斌.生态产品价值实现助推乡村产业振兴:基本逻辑、内在机理与实现路径[J].农村经济,2024(1):64-73.
[16] 肖鹏.闲置宅基地盘活利用中的农村集体经济组织[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024(5):147-157.
[17] 杨红红,董琳,李桦.非农就业对农户宅基地退出意愿的影响研究——基于就业程度与就业稳定性的双重视角[J].农村经济,2024(12):37-46.
[18] 翁贞林,魏天知,刘思宇,等.非农就业、家庭代际与农户"两闲"盘活利用行为——基于江西省实证[J].农林经济管理学报,2025(1):84-93.
[19] 张慧利,夏显力.农村劳动力流动如何影响农户宅基地退出行为?[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(1):139-148.
[20] 唐俐,何玉杰.乡村旅游产业发展视阈下宅基地"三权分置"改革的困境与进路[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021(6):139-148.
[21] 陶克涛,张术丹,赵云辉.什么决定了政府公共卫生治理绩效？——基于QCA方法的联动效应研究[J].管理世界, 2021(5): 128-138.
[22] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167.
[23] Papamitsiou Z, Pappas I O, Sharma K, et al. Utilizing Multimodal Data Through fsQCA to Explain Engagement in Adaptive Learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2020(4): 689-703.
[24] 程聪,贾良定.我国企业跨国并购驱动机制研究——基于清晰集的定性比较分析[J].南开管理评论,2016(6):113-121.
[25] 方芳,张立杰,赵军.制度组态视角下提升农业绿色全要素生产率的多元路径探析——基于动态QCA的面板数据分析[J].中国农村经济,2024(2):44-66.
[26] 杨慧莲,白子剑,郑阳阳,等.乡村振兴背景下城郊融合村庄宅基地资产化可行路径研究——基于北京市房山区黄山店村案例分析[J].中国土地科学,2024(3):82-91.

相似文献/References:

[1]贺林波,乔逸平.乡村振兴背景下乡村产业的风险转化及防范——以X市特色茶产业开发为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(01):99.
　HE Linbo,QIAO Yiping.Risk Conversion Mechanism of Rural Industry Revitalization in the Context of Rural Revitalization: Taking the Development of Characteristic Tea Industry in X City as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(05):99.
[2]许汉泽.产业进园:欠发达地区乡村产业振兴的新趋向——对H县“镇园产业联盟”模式的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(06):152.
　XU Hanze.Industry into the Park under the New Trend of Rural Industry Revitalization in Underdeveloped Areas: An Investigation on the Model of “Town-park Industrial Alliance” in H County[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(05):152.
[3]唐丽霞,刘浩然.农村闲置宅基地有效利用：动力基础与实现路径——基于昆明市乡村振兴试验区Y村的观察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(02):132.
　TANG Lixia,LIU Haoran.Effective Utilization of Rural Idle Homestead: Dynamic Basis and Realization Path: Based on the Observation of Y Village in Kunming Rural Revitalization Pilot Zone[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(05):132.
[4]高鸣,周子铭.“千万工程”经验赋能乡村产业发展的理论逻辑、现实基础与行动路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(02):1.
　GAO Ming,ZHOU Ziming.Theoretical Logic, Practical Basis and Action Path of the "Green Rural Revival Program" Experience in Empowering Rural Industrial Development[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(05):1.
[5]肖鹏.闲置宅基地盘活利用中的农村集体经济组织[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(05):147.
　XIAO Peng.Rural Collective Economic Organization in the Revitalization and Utilization of Idle Homestead[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(05):147.
[6]潘珣.数字技术赋能乡村产业人才队伍建设的理论机制、现实挑战与路径优化[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(01):104.
　PAN Xun.Theoretical Mechanisms, Practical Challenges, and Path Optimization of Digital Technology Empowering the Construction of Rural Industry Talent Team[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(05):104.
[7]陈雪婧,方淑敏.迈向超地方行动:乡村产业的行动者网络建构及其协商机制——基于云南寻甸Z社区“小山茶”项目的田野考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(01):128.
　CHEN Xuejing,FANG Shumin.Toward Super-local Action: The Construction of Actor-network in Rural Industries and Its Negotiation Mechanism: Based on the Field Study of the “Xiao Shan Tea” Project in Z Community, Xundian,Yunnan Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(05):128.
[8]陈昌玲,诸培新,张建.“政府有为”促“市场有效”:大城市郊区闲置宅基地治理研究——基于南京市高淳区闲置宅基地盘活的比较分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(02):124.
　CHEN Changling,ZHU Peixin,ZHANG Jian.Government Effective Promotes Market Efficient: A Study on Governance of Idle Homesteads in Suburban Area of the Metropolis—A Comparative Analysis of Revitalizing Idle Homestead in Gaochun District, Nanjing City[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(05):124.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-12-18。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目"生猪养殖环境规制对乡村土地利用变化影响研究"(42071221)
作者简介:张兆亮,男,南京农业大学公共管理学院博士生;邹伟(通信作者),男,南京农业大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01