[1]史志乐,张琦.脱贫攻坚保障:贫困县考核机制的改进完善和创新[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):45-55.
　SHI Zhile,ZHANG Qi.Guarantee for Poverty Alleviation: Improvement and Innovation of Poverty Assessment Mechanism of Poverty-Stricken Counties[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(02):45-55.
点击复制

脱贫攻坚保障:贫困县考核机制的改进完善和创新()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
18
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
45-55
栏目:
深化精准扶贫的理论与实践
出版日期:
2018-03-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Guarantee for Poverty Alleviation: Improvement and Innovation of Poverty Assessment Mechanism of Poverty-Stricken Counties
作者:
史志乐;  张琦
北京师范大学 中国教育与社会发展研究院/中国扶贫研究院, 北京 100875
Author(s):
SHI Zhile;  ZHANG Qi
关键词:
考核机制; 贫困考核; 脱贫攻坚; 演进完善
分类号:
C931
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
党的十八大以来，贫困县考核机制作为顺利实现我国脱贫攻坚的重要保障，经历了贫困人口从收入考核到以"两不愁三保障"为主的考核，党政领导干部从以GDP为主转向注重脱贫实绩的考核，考核机制从单一式、独立式考核到全程式、参与式考核的转变。目前在顶层设计上形成了以精准扶贫精准脱贫为主线的四梁八柱体制机制建设，在制度安排上实现了考核主体、考核内容、考核程序的综合布局，在政策实践上构建了以第三方评估为特点的上下联动考核体系。但是贫困县考核机制中仍然存在一些问题，多重考核检查互补性有待加强，交叉重叠性需要尽量克服，尤为重要的是扶贫脱贫持续性和长远性尚需提升。
Abstract:
As an important guarantee for the smooth realization of poverty alleviation in China, the assessment mechanism of poverty-stricken counties has undergone three major changes:from the income assessment to the "two-worries three-safeguard" for the poor people; from the focus on GDP to the achievement of poverty reduction performance appraisal for party and government leaders; from the single, independent assessment to the full program, and participatory assessment. This paper finds that the four-beam eight-pillar system has been completed with the main line of targeted poverty alleviation, the comprehensive layout of assessment subject, assessment content and assessment procedure has been realized in institutional arrangements, and the upper and lower linkage assessment system characterized by third-party evaluation has been constructed in policy practice. However, there are still some problems in the assessment mechanism of poor counties, for instance, the complementarity of multiple assessment tests needs to be strengthened, the cross-overlap of assessment needs to be overcome as far as possible, and the persistence of poverty reduction needs to be sustained.

参考文献/References:

[1] 黄承伟. 深化精准扶贫的路径选择——学习贯彻习近平总书记近期关于脱贫攻坚的重要论述[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(4).
[2] 汪洋.紧紧围绕精准扶贫精准脱贫深入推进脱贫攻坚[J].行政管理改革,2016(4).
[3] 吴国宝.改革完善贫困县考核机制[J].中国党政干部论坛,2015(4).
[4] 黄承伟.党的十八大以来脱贫攻坚理论创新和实践创新总结[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(5).
[5] 张琦,史志乐.我国农村贫困退出机制研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2016(3).
[6] 王晓毅.贫困治理:从技术精准到益贫发展[J].宁夏社会科学,2017(5).
[7] 汪三贵,曾小溪,殷浩栋. 中国扶贫开发绩效第三方评估简论——基于中国人民大学反贫困问题研究中心的实践[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(3).
[8] 刘彦随. 科学评估精准扶贫成效[N]. 光明日报,2016-06-10.
[9] 张琦,万君.考核机制助推贫困县如期脱贫[J].国家治理,2015(38).
[10] 崔月琴,龚小碟.支持性评估与社会组织治理转型——基于第三方评估机构的实践分析[J]. 国家行政学院学报,2017(4).
[11] 王小林.建立贫困退出机制确保贫困人口稳定脱贫[J].中国财政,2016(12).
[12] 张琦.中国绿色减贫指数报告(2016)[M].北京:经济日报出版社,2016.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-10-27。
基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目"贫困治理效果评估机制研究"（16JZD025）
作者简介:史志乐,女,北京师范大学中国教育与社会发展研究院博士后,经济学博士。
通讯作者:张琦,男,北京师范大学经济与资源管理研究院教授,博士生导师,中国扶贫研究院院长。E-mail:sxzhangq@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-27