[1]钱龙,冯永辉,卢华.地权稳定性对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——基于新一轮确权颁证调节效应的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(02):104-115.
　QIAN Long,FENG Yonghui,LU Hua.Impact of Land Tenure Stability on Farmer’s Cultivated Land Quality Protection Behavior: Analysis Based on Adjustment Effect of the New Round Land Certification[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):104-115.
点击复制

地权稳定性对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——基于新一轮确权颁证调节效应的分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
104-115
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2021-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of Land Tenure Stability on Farmer’s Cultivated Land Quality Protection Behavior: Analysis Based on Adjustment Effect of the New Round Land Certification
作者:
钱龙1;  冯永辉2;  卢华3
1. 南京财经大学 粮食和物资学院, 江苏 南京 210032;
2. 广西财经学院 校团委, 广西 南宁 530003;
3. 江西财经大学 生态文明研究院, 江西 南昌 330013
Author(s):
QIAN Long1;  FENG Yonghui2;  LU Hua3
关键词:
地权稳定性; 耕地质量保护; 确权颁证; 土地调整; 调节效应
Keywords:
Land Tenure Stability; Behavior of Arable Land Quality Protection; Land Certification; Experience of Land Adjustment; Adjustment Effect
分类号:
F301.1
摘要:
基于广西的农户调查，考察了地权稳定性对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响，并检验了新一轮确权颁证在其中的调节效应。研究表明，地权不稳定会显著负向影响农户耕地质量保护行为，二轮承包期间的土地大调整经历会降低农户施有机肥的可能性，土地小调整经历则不利于农户采用秸秆还田技术。当前正在推进的新一轮农地确权颁证在地权稳定性和农户耕地质量保护行为间发挥着显著调节作用，以提升产权安全性为目标的农地确权会削弱地权稳定性带来的负面影响。子样本检验、替代变量检验和Biprobit模型证实上述发现是稳健的。此外，对于秸秆还田行为，研究发现农地确权存在时滞效应，随着颁证时间延长，确权能更好地消除地权不稳定带来的负面影响。鉴于农地确权颁证有着积极的政策效应，能够削弱地权不稳定带来的负面影响，因此要以新一轮确权为契机，保持地权长期稳定，让新一轮确权有效保护农户地权，激励农户积极保护耕地质量。
Abstract:
This paper takes the survey in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region as an example to examine the impact of land tenure stability on farmer’s cultivated land quality protection behavior and examines the regulatory effect of the new round of confirmation of land ownership right on land tenure stability and farmer behavior. The research results show that instability of land rights could significantly negatively affect farmers’ adoption of arable land quality protection measures and reduce the possibility of farmers adopting protective behaviors. The large-scale land adjustment experience during the second round of contracting could reduce the possibility of farmers applying organic fertilizer, and the small-scale land adjustment experience is not conducive to farmers’ adoption of straw return technology. Further research finds that the current new round land certification is playing a significant role in regulating the stability of land rights and the protection of farmer’s cultivated land quality. The determination of land rights for improving the security of property rights could weaken the stability of land rights. The subsample test, a test that uses an alternate variable and the Biprobit model test all confirm that the above findings are robust. In addition, with regard to the behavior of farmers returning straw to the field, it is found that there is a time lag effect in confirming the right to agricultural land. In view of the positive policy effects of the confirmation of land tenure, it will weaken the negative impact of the instability of land tenure in history. Therefore, it is necessary to take the new round of confirmation of land tenure as an opportunity to maintain long-term stability of land tenure and let the new round land certification effectively protect farmers’ land property rights and encourage farmers to actively protect arable land.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孔凡斌,钟海燕,潘丹.小农户土壤保护行为分析——以施肥为例[J]. 农业技术经济,2019(1):100-110.
[2] 刘帅,余晓洋,吴迪.粮食主产区农户耕地质量保护情况调查研究——基于吉林省446户样本的分析[J]. 经济纵横,2019(2):79-87.
[3] 黄季焜,冀县卿.农地使用权确权与农户对农地的长期投资[J]. 管理世界,2012(9):76-81.
[4] Lovo S. Tenure Insecurity and Investment in Soil Conservation:Evidence from Malawi[J].World Development, 2016,78:219-229.
[5] Brandt L, Huang J, Li G, et al. Land Rights in Rural China:Facts, Fictions and Issues[J].The China Journal, 2002(47):67-97.
[6] Jacoby H G, Li G, Rozelle S. Hazards of Expropriation:Tenure Insecurity and Investment in Rural China[J]. American Economic Review, 2002, 92(5):1420-1447.
[7] 俞海,黄季焜,Scott Rozelle,等. 地权稳定性、土地流转与农地资源持续利用[J]. 经济研究,2003(9):82-91,95.
[8] Deininger K, Jin S Q. Tenure Security and Land-related Investment:Evidence from Ethiopia[J].European Economic Review, 2006, 50(5):1245-1277.
[9] Deininger K, Ali D A,Alemu T. Impacts of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Investment, and Land Market Participation:Evidence from Ethiopia[J].Land Economics, 2011, 87(2):312-334.
[10] Ma X L, Heerink N, Feng S Y, et al. Farmland Tenure in China:Comparing Legal, Actual and Perceived Security[J].Land Use Policy, 2015,42:293-306.
[11] Besley T. Property Rights and Investment Incentives:Theory and Evidence from Ghana[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103(5):903-937.
[12] 许庆,章元.土地调整、地权稳定性与农民长期投资激励[J]. 经济研究,2005(10):59-69.
[13] 陈铁,孟令杰.土地调整、地权稳定性与农户长期投资——基于江苏省调查数据的实证分析[J]. 农业经济问题,2007(10):4-11,110.
[14] 钟甫宁,纪月清.土地产权、非农就业机会与农户农业生产投资[J]. 经济研究,2009,44(12):43-51.
[15] Holden S T, Deininger K, Ghebru H. Impacts of Low-cost Land Certification on Investment and Productivity[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009, 91(2):359-373.
[16] Fenske J. Land Tenure and Investment Incentives:Evidence from West Africa[J].Journal of Development Economics, 2011, 95(2):137-156.
[17] 应瑞瑶,何在中,周南,等.农地确权、产权状态与农业长期投资——基于新一轮确权改革的再检验[J].中国农村观察,2018(3):110-127.
[18] 高立, 赵丛雨, 宋宇.农地承包经营权稳定性对农户秸秆还田行为的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(11):1972-1981.
[19] 钱忠好,冀县卿.中国农地流转现状及其政策改进——基于江苏、广西、湖北、黑龙江四省(区)调查数据的分析[J]. 管理世界,2016(2):71-81.
[20] 郑志浩,高杨.中央"不得调地"政策:农民的态度与村庄的土地调整决策——基于对黑龙江、安徽、山东、四川、陕西5省农户的调查[J]. 中国农村观察,2017(4):72-86.
[21] 叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等. 2016年中国农村土地使用权调查研究——17省份调查结果及政策建议[J]. 管理世界,2018,34(3):98-108.
[22] 林文声,王志刚.中国农地确权何以提高农户生产投资?[J]. 中国软科学, 2018(5):91-100.
[23] 钱龙,朱红根.农户感知与响应视角下的确权颁证政策绩效研究——基于江西省的问卷调查[J]. 农村经济,2019(4):21-30.
[24] 钱龙,冯永辉,陆华良,等.产权安全性感知对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响研究[J]. 中国土地科学,2019,33(10):93-101.
[25] 周力,王镱如. 新一轮农地确权对耕地质量保护行为的影响研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):63-71.
[26] Gelder J L, Luciano E C. Tenure Security as a Predictor of Housing Investment in Low-income Settlements:Testing a Tripartite Model[J].Environment and Planning A, 2015, 47(2):485-500.
[27] 仇焕广,刘乐,李登旺,等. 经营规模、地权稳定性与土地生产率——基于全国4省地块层面调查数据的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2017(6):30-43.
[28] 钱龙,缪书超,陆华良. 新一轮确权对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——来自广西的经验证据[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):28-37.
[29] 道格拉斯·C·诺斯,约翰·约瑟夫·瓦利斯,巴里·R·温格斯特. 暴力与社会秩序:诠释有文字记载的人类历史的一个概念性框架[M].上海:格致出版社/上海三联书店/上海人民出版社,2014.
[30] 德隆·阿西莫格鲁,詹姆斯·A·罗宾逊. 国家为什么会失败[M].李增刚,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2015.
[31] 周其仁.确权不可逾越——学习《决定》的一点体会[J].经济研究,2014,49(1):21-22.
[32] 李星光, 刘军弟, 霍学喜. 新一轮农地确权对农户生计策略选择的影响:以苹果种植户为例[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(10):1923-1934.
[33] Broegaard R J. Land Tenure Insecurity and Inequality in Nicaragua[J].Development and Change, 2005, 36(5):845-864.
[34] Feder G, Onchan T. Land Ownership Security and Farm Investment in Thailand[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1987, 69(2):311-320.
[35] 谢文宝,陈彤,刘国勇.乡村振兴背景下农户耕地质量保护技术采纳差异分析[J]. 改革,2018(11):117-129.
[36] 杨志海,王雅鹏,麦尔旦·吐尔孙.农户耕地质量保护性投入行为及其影响因素分析——基于兼业分化视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(12):105-112.
[37] 胡乃娟, 孙晓玲, 许雅婷, 等. 基于Logistic-ISM模型的农户有机肥施用行为影响因素及层次结构分解[J].资源科学,2019, 41(6):1120-1130.
[38] 叶剑平,蒋妍,罗伊·普罗斯特曼,等.2005年中国农村土地使用权调查研究——17省调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2006(7):77-84.
[39] 龙云,任力.农地流转制度对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——基于湖南省田野调查的实证研究[J].资源科学,2017,39(11):2094-2103.
[40] Goldstein M, Houngbedji K, Kondylis F, et al. Formalization without Certification? Experimental Evidence on Property Rights and Investment[J].Journal of Development Economics, 2018,132:57-74.
[41] 胡新艳,洪炜杰.农地调整经历对确权政策投资激励效应的影响[J]. 社会科学战线,2019(2):72-81.
[42] Hong W J, Luo B L, Hu X Y. Land Titling, Land Reallocation Experience, and Investment Incentives:Evidence from Rural China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 90:1-8.
[43] 程令国,张晔,刘志彪.农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗?[J]. 管理世界,2016(1):88-98.

相似文献/References:

[1]姚柳杨,赵敏娟,徐涛.经济理性还是生态理性?农户耕地保护的行为逻辑研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(05):86.
　YAO Liuyang,ZHAO Minjuan,XU Tao.Economic Rationality or Ecological Literacy? Logic of Peasant Households’ Soil Conservation Practices[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(02):86.
[2]刘洪彬,吕杰.大城市郊区农户对耕地质量保护认知行为差异及其影响因素——基于PSER分析框架的实证检验[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(06):71.
　LIU Hongbin,LÜ,Jie.Study on Differences and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land Quality Protection Cognitive Behavior of Farmers in Suburbs of Big City by Analysis Framework of PSER[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(02):71.
[3]耿鹏鹏.“规模实现”抑或“技术耗散”:地权稳定如何影响农户农业生产效率[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(01):108.
　GENG Pengpeng.“Achievement of Scale” or “Dissipation of Technology”: How Does Stability ofLand Rights Affect Agricultural Production Efficiency of Farmers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):108.
[4]钱龙,饶清玲,刘同山.地权稳定性对农户节水灌溉技术采纳行为的影响——来自黄淮海农区的经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(02):135.
　QIAN Long,RAO Qingling,LIU Tongshan.The Impact of Land Tenure Stability on the Adoption of Water-saving Irrigation Technology by Peasants: Empirical Evidence from Huanghuaihai Agricultural Areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(02):135.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-03-23。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目"农地确权、调整经历与农户耕地质量保护行为：机理与实证"（71803077）；国家自然科学基金青年项目"农户异质性视角下农地流转和地权稳定与耕地休养行为研究"（71803071）； 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"农地确权对农户土壤保护性投资行为的影响研究：作用机制及调整经历的调节效应"（18YJC90128）
作者简介:钱龙,男,南京财经大学粮食和物资学院副教授,硕士生导师。
通讯作者:冯永辉(通信作者),男,广西财经
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01