[1]郑中玉,于文洁.“特色”建构的多元主体与多元阐释——基于旭日村满族特色小镇的案例研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(03):36-45.
　ZHENG Zhongyu,YU Wenjie.The Multiple Subjects and Explanations in Building “the Character”:A Case Study of a Manchu-featured Town[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(03):36-45.
点击复制

“特色”建构的多元主体与多元阐释——基于旭日村满族特色小镇的案例研究()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
36-45
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2022-07-16

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Multiple Subjects and Explanations in Building “the Character”:A Case Study of a Manchu-featured Town
作者:
郑中玉;  于文洁
哈尔滨工业大学 社会学系, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150001
Author(s):
ZHENG Zhongyu;  YU Wenjie
关键词:
特色小镇; 特色建构; 官方特色; 地方文化; 特色阐释
Keywords:
Town with a Feature; Character-construction; Official Characters; Local Culture; Character-explanation
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
现有研究倾向于讨论特色小镇的特色应该如何规划,强调产业和地方文化的特色要素选择。但鲜有注意特色本身并不是一成不变、自然而然的共识,特色建构中存在多元建构主体和多元阐释方式。在一个满族特色小镇的建设个案中,研究发现存在三种特色建构与阐释的主体和两大类特色。其中地方精英基于项目制建构的杂糅特色和技术精英基于历史遗迹建构的满族特色,都是合法的官方阐释。本地社区居民集中在"城-乡"二元话语框架下,将本地特色阐释为乡村特色,但它并不是特色小镇的合法性话语。最终,特色小镇建设更多的只是一种项目制运作的结果,倾向于脱离本地社区文化和日常生活。需要思考的是,特色小镇建设如何将特色建构及其运作与社区营造和地方性文化的再嵌入相结合,让村民成为特色建构的参与者,以促进地方文化的传承与再生产。
Abstract:
Current studies tend to discuss how to designthe characters or features of towns with certain features and emphasize the elements chosen from the perspectives of both the industry and local culture. Very few, however, notice that the character or feature is not a natural consensus but is subject to multiple subjects and explanations. According to a case study of Manchu-Featured Town, there are three subjects and two kinds of characters or features. Local elites and technological elites separately construct two kinds of characters:the one is a sort of mixed character based on the project system; the other is a kind of Manchu character based on antiquities. These two are official characters with the legality. As another subject, the locals who are under the dualist view of "rural vs urban" treat the local character as rural character. Unfortunately, knowledge and standpoints of local peasants are always ignored. In sum, the construction of a town with a feature is the result of persistent project and tends to separate itself from the local culture and community. Further researches have to be concerned about how to combine constructing characters with building community and re-embedding characters into the local community culture and how to improve the level of community participation, in order to promote the reproduction of local culture.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李培林.新中国70年社会建设和社会巨变[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(4):1-10.
[2] 陆大道,陈明星.关于"国家新型城镇化规划(2014-2020)"编制大背景的几点认识[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):179-185.
[3] 国家发展改革委.关于规范推进特色小镇和特色小城镇建设的若干意见[J].财经界,2018(8):1-2.
[4] 周晓虹.产业转型与文化再造:特色小镇的创建路径[J].南京社会科学,2017(4):12-19.
[5] 王博雅,张车伟,蔡翼飞.特色小镇的定位与功能再认识——城乡融合发展的重要载体[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):140-147.
[6] 盛世豪,张伟明.特色小镇:一种产业空间组织形式[J].浙江社会科学,2016(3):36-38.
[7] 庄晋财,卢文秀,华贤宇.产业链空间分置与特色小镇产业培育[J].学习与实践,2018(8):36-43.
[8] 吴德进,陈捷.要素集聚下特色小镇建设引领乡村振兴研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2019(1):146-152.
[9] 陈立旭.论特色小镇建设的文化支撑[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2016,32(5):14-20.
[10] 闵学勤.精准治理视角下的特色小镇及其创建路径[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2016,27(5):55-60.
[11] 张鸿雁.特色小镇建设与城市化模式创新论——重构中国文化的根柢[J].南京社会科学,2017(12):59-67.
[12] 付晓东,蒋雅伟.基于根植性视角的我国特色小镇发展模式探讨[J].中国软科学,2017(8):102-111.
[13] 席丽莎,刘建朝,王明浩. "文化源" +"产业丛"——新时代特色小镇发育的动力及其机制[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(10):151-155.
[14] Shin H. Re-making a Place-of-memory:The Competition between Representativeness and Place-making Knowledge in Gwangju, South Korea[J]. Urban Studies, 2016,53(16):3566-3583.
[15] Dinardi C. Cities for Sale:Contesting City Branding and Cultural Policies in Buenos Aires[J].Urban Studies, 2015,54(1):85-101.
[16] De Frantz M. Tourism Marketing and Urban Politics:Cultural Planning in a European Capital[J].Tourism Geographies, 2018,20(3):481-503.
[17] 朱克英.城市文化[M].张廷佺,杨东霞,谈瀛洲,译.上海:上海教育出版社,2006.
[18] 焦长权.从分税制到项目制:制度演进和组织机制[J].社会,2019,39(6):121-148.
[19] 渠敬东.项目制:一种新的国家治理体制[J].中国社会科学,2012(5):113-130.
[20] Taylor J P. Authenticity and Sincerity in Tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2001,28(1):7-26.
[21] Ounanian K. Not a "Museum Town":Discussions of Authenticity in Coastal Denmark[J]. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 2019,17(3):285-305.
[22] Wang N. Rethinking Authenticity in Tourism Experience[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999,26(2):349-370.
[23] Rickly-boyd J M. Authenticity&Aura:A Benjaminian Approach to Tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2012,39(1):269-289.
[24] Maccannell D. Staged Authenticity:Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973,79(3):589-603.
[25] Wels H. About Romance and Reality:Popular European Imagery in Postcolonial Tourism in Southern Africa[M]//Hall M C, Tucker H. Tourism and Postcolonialism. Abingdon:Routledge, 2004:279-285.
[26] White C M. More Authentic than Thou:Authenticity and Othering in Fiji Tourism Discourse[J]. Tourist Studies, 2007,7(1):25-49.
[27] Tiberghien G, Bremner H, Milne S. Authenticity and Disorientation in the Tourism Experience[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2020,30:100283.
[28] 佐金.裸城:原真性城市场所的生与死[M].丘兆达,刘蔚,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2015:280-285.
[29] 雷蒙·威廉斯.乡村与城市[M].韩子满,刘戈,徐珊珊,译.北京:商务印书馆,2013:65-67.
[30] 胥志强.民俗学中本真性话语的根源、局限及超越[J].民俗研究,2019(3):31-38.
[31] 詹姆斯·C·斯科特.国家的视角:那些试图改善人类状况的项目是如何失败的[M].王晓毅,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017:100-101.
[32] 孟德拉斯H.农民的终结[M].2版.李培林,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2010:55-60.
[33] 王铭铭.灵验的"遗产":围绕一个村神及其仪式的考察[M]//郭于华.仪式与社会变迁.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000,38.
[34] 程美宝.地域文化与国家认同:晚清以来"广东文化"观的形成[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2006:226-275.
[35] 李祖佩. "新代理人":项目进村中的村治主体研究[J].社会,2016,36(3):167-191.
[36] 折晓叶,陈婴婴.项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑——对"项目进村"案例的社会学分析[J].中国社会科学,2011(4):126-148.
[37] 桂华.项目制与农村公共品供给体制分析——以农地整治为例[J].政治学研究,2014(4):50-62.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-12-01。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目"历史街区改造中城市文化要素的选择及其博弈研究"(21BSH068)
作者简介:郑中玉,男,哈尔滨工业大学社会学系教授;于文洁,女,哈尔滨工业大学社会学系博士生
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01