[1]杜姣.农地调整的治理内涵——基于山东S镇的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):110-118.
　DU Jiao.Governance Connotation of Farmland Adjustment: Based on the Investigation of S Town in Shandong[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):110-118.
点击复制

农地调整的治理内涵——基于山东S镇的考察()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
110-118
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2017-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Governance Connotation of Farmland Adjustment: Based on the Investigation of S Town in Shandong
作者:
杜姣
华中科技大学 公共管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430074
Author(s):
DU Jiao
关键词:
农地调整; 结平衡账; 村民自治; 村级治理
分类号:
F301.1
摘要:
文章结合实地调查经验，揭示了农地调整的治理内涵，以突破既有的认识框架。研究发现，"结平衡账"构成了农地调整的核心机制，其实质是在村社范围内构建和形塑一套权利与义务的平衡体系。农地调整对"结平衡账"机制的启动，在实现土地利益于村民间均衡分配目标的基础上，还蕴藏着丰富的治理内涵，具体表现在两个方面：一是，它实现了对村民全面和深度的动员，为村民自治制度的运行提供了实践场域，激发了村民自治的活力；二是，它为村庄日常积累的矛盾提供了化解平台，增强了村级组织在村民当中的合法性。因此，农地调整实践从总体上达到了村民的强政治参与能力和村级组织的强治理能力的双强效果，村级自主治理能力不断得到激发和增强。在农村村级治权普遍弱化的情况下，反思当前的农村确权实践，仍具有必要性。
Abstract:
Based on the field survey experience, the article seeks to reveal the governance connotation of farmland adjustment to break through the existing knowledge framework. The study found that ‘Balance Account’ constitutes the core mechanism of farmland adjustment, and its essence is to construct and shape the balance system of rights and obligations within the scope of the village. On the basis of realizing the goal of land interests in village folk equilibrium assignment, the farmland adjustment to the start of the ‘balance account’ mechanism also contains a wealth of governance connotation. It is embodied in two aspects: firstly, it has achieved a comprehensive and in-depth mobilization of the villagers, provided the practice field for the operation of the villager autonomy system, and stimulated the vitality of the villagers’ self governance; secondly, it provides a platform for solving the contradiction of the daily accumulation of the village and enhances the legitimacy of village organizations in the village. Therefore, the practice of farmland adjustment has generally reached the double effects which are the strong political participation of the villagers and the strong governance capacity of the village level organizations. The ability of the village level self-governance has been continuously stimulated and strengthened. Under the current situation of the governance power’s general weakening at the rural village level, it still has the necessity to rethink the practice of establishing the rural land-use rights.

参考文献/References:

[1] 叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍,等.2008年中国农村土地使用权调查研究——17省调查结果及政策建议[J].管理世界,2010(1):64-73.
[2] 聂建亮,钟涨宝.庇护与坚持:农地调整的存续逻辑——基于对湖北邢村的个案研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(6):74-83.
[3] 陈柏峰.地方性规范与农地违法调整[J].古今农业,2008(3):4-7.
[4] 郭俊霞.土地调整的地方性共识[N].中国社会科学报,2010-03-16(11).
[5] Yao Yang. Institutional Arrangements, Tenure Insecurity and Agricultural Productivity in Post Reform Rural China[R]. Madison: Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin,1995.
[6] Li Guo, Scott Rozelle, Loren Brandt. Tenure, Land Right, and Farmer Investment Incentives in China[J]. Agricultural Economics,1998(19):63-71.
[7] Kung J K. Equal Entitlement Versus Tenure Security Under a Regime of Collective Property Rights: Peasants’ Performance for Institution in Post-reform Chinese Agriculture[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,1995(21):82-111.
[8] Kung J K. Common Property Rights and Land Realbcations in Rural China:Evidence from a Village Survey[J]. World Development, 2000(28):701-719.
[9] 许庆,章元.土地调整、地权稳定性与农民长期投资激励[J].经济研究,2005(10):59-69.
[10] 姚洋.农地制度与农业绩效的实证研究[J].中国农村观察,1998(6):1-10.
[11] 于建嵘.农民维权重心重大变化:从税费负担到土地纠纷[N].南方周末,2004-09-02(A04).
[12] 陈志武.界定土地产权,不能再回避[N].南方都市报,2009-02-14(A02).
[13] 贺雪峰.农村土地的政治学[J].学习与探索,2010(2):70-75.
[14] 毛丹,王萍.村级组织的农地调控权[J].社会学研究,2004(6):41-51.
[15] 贺雪峰.土地与农村公共品供给[J].江西社会科学,2009(1):19-24.
[16] 龚为纲.农村人口变动与土地制度实践的区域差异[J].学习与实践,2009(6):107-115.
[17] 朱冬亮.土地调整:农村社会保障与农村社会控制[J].中国农村观察,2002(3):14-21+28.
[18] 周飞舟.土地调整中的权力关系[D].北京:北京大学社会学系,1996.
[19] 李昌平.再向总理说实话[M].北京:中国财富出版社,2012:89.
[20] 李昌平.现在的农民为何"爱"上访[N].南方日报,2009-06-10.
[21] 哈耶克.经济学、科学与政治学[M]//哈耶克论文集.邓正来,编译.北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2001:411.
[22] 姚洋.中国农地制度:一个分析框架[J].中国社会科学,2002(2):54-65.
[23] 吴玲,李翠霞.农地稳定与农地调整——农地制度安排的悖论[J].当代世界与社会主义,2007(2):108-111.
[24] 杜赞奇.文化、权力与国家:1900—1942年的华北农村[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2010.
[25] 陈锋.连带式制衡:基层组织权力的运作机制[J].社会,2012(1):104-125.
[26] 曹海林.村庄治权合法性来源的嬗变进路及其现代构造[J].天津社会科学,2013(1):63-68.
[27] 李昌平. 乡村治权与乡村治理[J/OL].(2011-05-23).

相似文献/References:

[1]聂建亮,钟涨宝.庇护与坚持：农地调整的存续逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(06):74.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(04):74.
[2]王海娟.农地调整的效率逻辑及其制度变革启示——以湖北沙洋县农地调整实践为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(05):96.
　WANG Haijuan.Efficiency Logic of Farmland Adjustment and Reflection of Institutional Change: Based on an Example of Farmland Adjustment Practice in Shayang County in Hubei[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):96.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-01-17。
基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"完善基层社会治理机制研究"（14JZD030）
作者简介:杜姣,女,华中科技大学公共管理学院博士生,华中科技大学中国乡村治理研究中心研究人员。E-mail:dujiao19900918@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-20