[1]展进涛,张慧仪,陈超.果农施用农药的效率测度与减少错配的驱动力量——基于中国桃主产县524个种植户的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(06):148-156.
　ZHAN Jintao,ZHANG Huiyi,CHEN Chao.The Analysis of Efficiency Measurement of Pesticide Application for Fruit Growers and the Driving Force to Reduce Misallocation: Empirical Analysis: Based on 524 Peach Farmers from 85 Production Counties in China[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(06):148-156.
点击复制

果农施用农药的效率测度与减少错配的驱动力量——基于中国桃主产县524个种植户的实证分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
148-156
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2020-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Analysis of Efficiency Measurement of Pesticide Application for Fruit Growers and the Driving Force to Reduce Misallocation: Empirical Analysis: Based on 524 Peach Farmers from 85 Production Counties in China
作者:
展进涛;  张慧仪;  陈超
南京农业大学 经济管理学院/中国粮食安全研究中心, 江苏 南京 210095
Author(s):
ZHAN Jintao;  ZHANG Huiyi;  CHEN Chao
关键词:
边际生产率; 损失控制模型; 病虫害防治; 绿色防控技术; 施药行为
Keywords:
Marginal Productivity; Damage Control Model; Pest Control and Management; Green Control Techniques; Pesticide Use
分类号:
F326.12
摘要:
面对农业面源污染严峻和农业生产要素成本上升的双重压力，推进化学农药减量增效以及病虫害绿色综合防控是实现农业可持续发展目标的政策要求之一。基于2018年全国85个县524份桃种植户调研样本，运用损失控制模型估算果农农药投入的边际生产率，进而采用Probit方法分析影响果农过量施用农药的因素。研究发现：75.38%的样本果农存在过量施药现象，且在控制了病虫害发生程度下，政府有施药检查经历、市场组织化程度高、文化水平较高的果农过量施用农药的概率越低。此外，对不同病虫害防治模式进行分组回归的结果表明：政府施药监管对于抑制纯化学农药防治下的过量投入影响显著，过量施药概率下降14.26%；加入合作社、企业等市场组织对于采纳病虫害绿色防控防治模式具有较强的激励效果，过量施药概率下降10.42%。
Abstract:
In the face of the double pressure of severe agricultural non-point source pollution and rising cost of agricultural production factors, it is one of the policy requirements to promote the reduction and efficiency of chemical pesticides and green comprehensive prevention and control of pests and diseases to achieve the goal of agricultural sustainable development. Based on 524 peach farmers’ survey data of China in 2018, this paper uses the improved damage control model to estimate the marginal productivity of pesticide input factors of fruit farmers, and then uses Probit method to analyze the factors affecting excessive pesticide application of fruit farmers. The results show that the average marginal productivity of pesticide is close to 0, which indicates that there is a certain degree of overuse of pesticide. However, under the control of the occurrence of diseases and insect pests, the probability of overuse of pesticide is lower when the government has the supervision and inspection of pesticide application, the degree of market organization is high, and the level of education is high. In addition, the results of group regression of different pest control modes show that the government’s supervision and inspection policies have a significant impact on the inhibition of excessive pesticide investment under the pure chemical pesticide control mode, and the high degree of market organization has a strong normative effect on the adoption of green control mode. It can be seen that, in addition to strengthening green prevention and control subsidies, the current reduction of pesticide investment in fruit and vegetable products can not relax government regulation while giving play to market guidance.

参考文献/References:

[1] Babcock B A, Lichtenberg E, Zilberman D. Impact of Damage Control and Quality of Output:Estimating Pest Control Effectiveness[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1992, 74(1):163-172.
[2] 王建华, 邓远远, 朱淀. 生猪养殖中兽药投入效率测度——基于损害控制模型的分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(1):63-77.
[3] 侯建昀, 刘军弟, 霍学喜. 区域异质性视角下农户农药施用行为研究——基于非线性面板数据的实证分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(4):1-9.
[4] Lichtenberg E. Economics of Pesticide Use and Regulation[J]. Science, 1991, 253(5019):518-522.
[5] Headley J C. Estimating the Productivity of Agricultural Pesticides[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1968,50(1):13-23.
[6] Lichtenberg E, Zilberman D. The Econometrics of Damage Control:Why Specification Matters[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1986, 68(2):261-273.
[7] Huang J K, Hu R F, Rozelle D, et al. Transgenic Varieties and Productivity of Smallholder Cotton Farmers in China[J]. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2002, 46(3):367-387.
[8] 周曙东, 张宗毅. 农户农药施药效率估算、影响因素及其与农药生产率关系研究——对农药损失控制生产函数的改进[J]. 农业技术经济, 2013(3):4-14.
[9] 朱淀, 孔霞, 顾建平. 农户过量施用农药的非理性均衡:来自中国苏南地区农户的证据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(8):17-29.
[10] 孔霞. 农业农药生产率及农药施用行为的影响因素分析[D].苏州:苏州大学, 2013.
[11] Sharafi K, Pirsaheb M, Maleki S, et al. Knowledge Attitude and Practices of Farmers about Pesticide Use, Risks, and Wastes; A Cross-Sectional Study (Kermanshah, Iran)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,645(15):509-517.
[12] 黄炎忠, 罗小锋. 既吃又卖:稻农的生物农药施用行为差异分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(7):63-78.
[13] 高晶晶, 史清华. 农户生产性特征对农药施用的影响:机制与证据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(11):83-99.
[14] 李昊, 李世平, 南灵,等. 农户农药施用行为及其影响因素——来自鲁、晋、陕、甘四省693份经济作物种植户的经验证据[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018(2):161-168.
[15] 林锐, 周力, 周曙东. 规模分化视角下农户农药施用行为的邻里效应分析——以花生种植户为例[J]. 福建农业学报, 2018(11):1224-1230.
[16] 刘明. 设施蔬菜种植户农药使用效率研究——以设施菜椒为例[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2018.
[17] 王常伟, 顾海英. 市场VS政府,什么力量影响了我国菜农农药用量的选择?[J].管理世界,2013(11):50-66.
[18] 姜健, 周静, 孙若愚. 菜农过量施用农药行为分析——以辽宁省蔬菜种植户为例[J].农业技术经济,2017(11):16-25.
[19] Khan M, Mahmood H Z, Damalas C A. Pesticide Use and Risk Perceptions Among Farmers in the Cotton Belt of Punjab, Pakistan[J]. Crop Protection, 2015, 67(1):184-190.
[20] 黄祖辉, 钟颖琦, 王晓莉. 不同政策对农户农药施用行为的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2016(8):148-155.
[21] 黄季焜, 齐亮, 陈瑞剑. 技术信息知识、风险偏好与农民施用农药[J].管理世界,2008(5):71-76.

相似文献/References:

[1]钟国辉,郭忠兴,汪险生.城市土地边际生产率的空间计量分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(01):68.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(06):68.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-03-21。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目"异质性视角下农业重大病虫害协同防治的同群效应及干预机制研究"；国家自然科学基金项目"转基因食品安全性事件的同伴效应及对信息分享行为的影响机制研究：社会影响的视角"；江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目（PAPD）
作者简介:展进涛,男,南京农业大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师;张慧仪,女,南京农业大学经济管理学院硕士生;陈超,男,南京农业大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01