[1]杜鹏.乡村振兴战略下的集体经营机制:类型与比较——基于村庄治理能力的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(01):52-63.
　DU Peng.Collective Management Mechanism Under Rural Vitalization Strategy: Typesand Comparison from the Perspective of Village Governance Capacity[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(01):52-63.
点击复制

乡村振兴战略下的集体经营机制:类型与比较——基于村庄治理能力的视角()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
52-63
栏目:
农村社会发展
出版日期:
2020-12-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Collective Management Mechanism Under Rural Vitalization Strategy: Typesand Comparison from the Perspective of Village Governance Capacity
作者:
杜鹏
南开大学 周恩来政府管理学院,天津 300350
Author(s):
DU Peng
关键词:
集体经营; 乡村振兴; 类型比较; 集体经济; 治理能力
Keywords:
Collective Operation; Rural Revitalization; Type Comparison; Collective Economy; Governance Capabilities
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
经营性是集体的实践内核，反映了集体的能动性和适应性。基于"统分结合"与"政经合一"的实践属性及其要素配置，经营性集体的实践形态大致可划分为福利化集体、公司化集体、动员性集体和服务性集体等四种理想类型。集体经营的能动性实践再生产了集体的治理结构，从而突破了集体土地制度的产权界定。对四种经营类型的比较分析发现，经济导向的集体经营模式可能消解农民与集体的政治关联，强化农民与集体的对立，导致集体经营的"经济陷阱"，抑制了村庄治理能力。政治导向的集体经营则展现了更为广阔的实践面向，从而免于陷入集体经济资源本身的竞争和分配，促进了村庄治理能力的持续生成。可见，村庄治理能力并不能简单还原为集体经济资源的多少。乡村振兴战略下的集体经营不应局限于发展集体经济的层次，还应着眼于激发集体的政治活力，以村社集体的组织振兴推动乡村振兴。
Abstract:
Management attribute is the core of collective practice, which reflects the collective initiative and adaptability. Based on the practical attributes of "the combination of unity and division" and "the integration of politics and economics" and their elements allocation, the practical forms of profit-making collectives can be roughly divided into four ideal types: welfare collectives, corporate collectives, mobilization collectives and service collectives. The active practice of collective management reproduces the collective governance structure, thus breaking through the definition of property right of collective land system. The comparative analysis of the four types of management shows that the economy-oriented collective management model may dissolve the political connection between farmers and collectives, strengthen the antagonism between farmers and collectives, lead to the "economic trap" of collective management, and inhibit the ability of village governance. The politically oriented collective management shows a broader practical orientation, thus avoiding the competition and distribution of the collective economic resources themselves. Collective management promotes the sustainable generation of governance capacity. Village governance capacity can not be simply reduced to collective economic resources. The collective management under the rural vitalization strategy should not only be limited to the level of developing the collective economy, but also be aimed at stimulating the collective political vitality and promoting the rural vitalization through the vitalization of the village collective organizations.

参考文献/References:

[1] 耿羽.壮大集体经济助推乡村振兴——习近平关于农村集体经济重要论述研究[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2019(2):14-19.
[2] 贺雪峰.最后一公里村庄[M].北京:中信出版社,2017.
[3] 李祖佩.乡村治理领域中的"内卷化"问题省思[J].中国农村观察,2017(6):116-129.
[4] 仝志辉.选举事件与村庄政治:村庄社会关联中的村民选举参与[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004:11.
[5] 桂华.农村土地制度与村民自治的关联分析——兼论村级治理的经济基础[J].政治学研究,2017(1):99-110.
[6] 桂华.产权秩序与农村基层治理:类型与比较——农村集体产权制度改革的政治分析[J].开放时代,2019(2):36-52.
[7] 申端锋.农村土地问题不只是农民权利问题——以中部某省粮食主产区三个村庄的土地调整为例[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,5(4):26-32.
[8] 周建明.应如何看待村级集体经济——基于国家治理体系和治理能力的视角[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2015(5):10-15.
[9] 黄振华.能人带动:集体经济有效实现形式的重要条件[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,54(1):15-20.
[10] 高飞.论集体土地所有权主体制度的缺失根源及解决路径[J].云南大学学报(法学版),2010,23(4):8-14.
[11] 仇叶.集体资产管理的市场化路径与实践悖论——兼论集体资产及其管理制度的基本性质[J].农业经济问题,2018,39(8):17-27.
[12] 桂华.从经营制度向财产制度异化——集体农地制度改革的回顾、反思与展望[J].政治经济学评论,2016,7(5):126-142.
[13] 周建明,夏江旗,张友庭.发展农村集体经济——中国特色社会主义道路中亟需解决的一个重大问题[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2013(2):46-51.
[14] 陈柏峰.乡村振兴战略背景下的村社集体:现状与未来[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,71(3):154-163.
[15] 韩松.论成员集体与集体成员——集体所有权的主体[J].法学,2005(8):41-50.
[16] 焦长权,周飞舟."资本下乡"与村庄的再造[J].中国社会科学,2016(1):110-116.
[17] 杜鹏.土地秩序的政治底蕴[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,18(1):9-23.
[18] 杜鹏.村级物业化治理:农村社区治理转型路径与反思[J].学习与实践,2016(10):107-115.
[19] 杜赞奇.文化、权力与国家:1900-1942年的华北农村[M].王福明,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2003.
[20] 姜红利,宋宗宇.集体土地所有权归属主体的实践样态与规范解释[J].中国农村观察,2017(6):2-13.
[21] 安永军.农村公共品供给中的"市场包干制":运作模式与实践逻辑[J].中国农村经济,2020(1):36-47.

相似文献/References:

[1]陆剑.我国农村集体统层法律制度缺失及其完善——基于湖北省“一镇三村”的实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(01):75.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(01):75.
[2]王景新,支晓娟.中国乡村振兴及其地域空间重构——特色小镇与美丽乡村同建振兴乡村的案例、经验及未来[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):17.
　WANG Jingxin,ZHI Xiaojuan.Rural Revitalization in China and its Regional Spatial Reconstruction: Case Study and Prospects of “Building up Characteristic Towns with Beautiful Countryside” to Revitalize Chinese Countryside[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):17.
[3]陈美球,廖彩荣,刘桃菊.乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):27.
　CHEN Meiqiu,LIAO Cairong,LIU Taoju.Rural Revitalization, Collective Economic Organization and Land Use System Innovation: Based on Analysis of Huangxi Village, Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):27.
[4]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):19.
　HE Xuefeng.Some Issues in Rural Thriving Strategy Implementation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):19.
[5]刘祖云,王丹.“乡村振兴”战略落地的技术支持[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):8.
　LIU Zuyun,WANG Dan.The Technical Support for Implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):8.
[6]张艺颉.乡村振兴背景下村民自治制度建设与转型路径研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):47.
　ZHANG Yijie.Villager Self-governance System Construction and Transformation Path under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):47.
[7]王肖芳.农民工返乡创业集群驱动乡村振兴:机理与策略[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):101.
　WANG Xiaofang.A Study of Migrant Workers Returning Home to Start Businesses Cluster Drive Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):101.
[8]张勇.农村宅基地制度改革的内在逻辑、现实困境与路径选择——基于农民市民化与乡村振兴协同视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):118.
　ZHANG Yong.The Internal Logic, Realistic Predicament and Path Choice of the Rural Homestead System Reform: Based on the Coordination Perspective of Peasant’s Citizenship and Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):118.
[9]叶敬忠,张明皓.“小农户”与“小农”之辩——基于“小农户”的生产力振兴和“小农”的生产关系振兴[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):1.
　YE Jingzhong,ZHANG Minghao.Differences Between Smallholders and Peasants: Smallholders Based Vitalization of Productive Forces and Peasants Based Vitalization of Productive Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):1.
[10]吴重庆,张慧鹏.小农与乡村振兴——现代农业产业分工体系中小农户的结构性困境与出路[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):13.
　WU Chongqing,ZHANG Huipeng.Small Farmers and Rural Revitalization: Structural Dilemma and Outlet of Small Farmers in Modern Agricultural Industry Division System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):13.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-07-17。
基金项目:天津市社会科学规划基金青年项目"老年人精神福利的村庄社会基础研究"（TJSRQN19-001）；国家社会科学基金重大项目"新时代中国马克思主义社会学的理论创新和意识形态建设研究"（18ZDA163）
作者简介:杜鹏,男,南开大学周恩来政府管理学院助理研究员。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01