[1]王全忠,朱赛,周宏.权责主体认知偏移对农户耕地保护技术选择偏好的机制研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(04):75-88.
　WANG Quanzhong,ZHU Sai,ZHOU Hong.A Study on the Mechanism of Cognitive Bias of the Responsible Subject to Farmers’ Selection Preference for Cropland Protection Technology[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(04):75-88.
点击复制

权责主体认知偏移对农户耕地保护技术选择偏好的机制研究()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
24
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
75-88
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2024-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Mechanism of Cognitive Bias of the Responsible Subject to Farmers’ Selection Preference for Cropland Protection Technology
作者:
王全忠1;  朱赛1;  周宏2
1. 安庆师范大学 经济与管理学院, 安庆 246133;
2. 南京农业大学 经济管理学院, 南京 210095
Author(s):
WANG Quanzhong1;  ZHU Sai1;  ZHOU Hong2
关键词:
耕地保护; 保护性耕作技术; 权责主体认知; 选择偏好
Keywords:
Farmland Conservation; Conservation Tillage Technology; Perception of Subjects to Right and Responsibility; Choice Preferences
分类号:
F301.21
摘要:
基于苏皖两省农村入户调查数据,分析农地流转视角下的农户权责主体认知偏移对耕地保护技术选择偏好的影响机制。研究发现:(1)流转视角下农户对耕地保护权责“各有所表”,“谁种谁保护”的实用主义和“是谁的,谁保护”的物权意识并存,农户耕地保护“角色—认知—行为”的多重偏离致使其技术选择偏好于短期和浅表型技术。(2)农户耕地保护权责主体非己认知对行为发生数、中长期行为和深入改进型行为均有负向影响。(3)农户权责主体偏移显著抑制耕地保护投资,但较长的流转租期能对冲非己认知对投资及行为偏好的负向影响。据此,未来引导农户参与耕地保护,应通过“政府宣传+技术推广”体系适度纠正农户对耕地保护权责主体的认知偏移,立足产品增值与流转制度保障协同增进农户对采纳耕地保护技术的经济预期,以及推进耕地保护补贴和农村“两权”抵押贷款等政策创新。
Abstract:
This study employs survey data from rural households in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces to examine the mechanism underlying cognitive bias in the responsibility subjects that influence farmers’ preferences for farmland protection technologies within the context of farmland transfer. The analysis reveals several key findings: Firstly, from the perspective of farmland transfer, farmers’ rights and responsibilities in arable land protection are characterized by distinct temporalities, encompassing both the pragmatic approach of "whoever uses, whoever protects" and the proprietary stance of "whoever owns, whoever protects." The multifaceted deviations in farmers’ role-perception-behavior regarding arable land protection result in a preference for short-term and superficial technologies. Secondly, farmers’ perception of themselves as non-principal agents in arable land protection negatively impacts the frequency and duration of protective behaviors, as well as the propensity for behavior enhancement. Thirdly, the cognitive bias in farmers’ rights and responsibilities significantly curtails investment in farmland protection; however, longer transfer leases can mitigate the adverse effects of farmers’ non-principal responsibility perception on investment and behavioral preferences. To facilitate farmer participation in arable land protection, it is imperative to address cognitive biases through government-led public awareness and technology promotion campaigns. Additionally, leveraging the synergy between value-added agricultural products and the security of the transfer system can enhance farmers’ economic expectations of adopting arable land protection technologies. Furthermore, policy innovations such as the introduction of land protection subsidies and the development of rural land mortgage initiatives for contractual and franchise rights should be pursued.

参考文献/References:

[1] Selejio O, Lokina R B, Mduma J K. Smallholder Agricultural Production Efficiency of Adopters and Nonadopters of Land Conservation Technologies in Tanzania [J]. Journal of Environment & Development, 2018, 27(3): 323-349.
[2] 颜玉琦,陈美球,张洁,等.农户环境友好型耕地保护技术的采纳意愿与行为响应——基于江西省1092户农户测土配方施肥技术应用的实证[J].中国土地科学,2021(10):85-93.
[3] Forsyth T. Sustainable Land Use and Rural Development in Southeast Asia: Innovations and Policies for Mountainous Areas [J]. Southeast Asian Studies, 2013,6(2): 463-490.
[4] Klik A, Rosner J. Long-term Experience with Conservation Tillage Practices in Austria: Impacts on Soil Erosion Processes [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 203:104669.
[5] 仇焕广,苏柳方,张祎彤,等.风险偏好、风险感知与农户保护性耕作技术采纳[J].中国农村经济,2020(7):59-79.
[6] 李卫,薛彩霞,姚顺波,等.保护性耕作技术、种植制度与土地生产率——来自黄土高原农户的证据[J].资源科学,2017,39(7):1259-1271.
[7] 黄炎忠,罗小锋,刘迪,等.农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素——对高意愿低行为的现象解释[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):632-641.
[8] 陈银蓉,王晓妹,梅昀.基于Logit-ISM模型的农户耕地保护意愿与行为的悖离研究——以武汉城市圈为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(4):927-936.
[9] Asghar B, Ali T. Farmers’ Intended and Actual Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Practices [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 259: 107244.
[10] Farmer J R, Ma Z, Drescher M, et al. Private Landowners, Voluntary Conservation Programs, and Implementation of Conservation Friendly Land Management Practices[J]. Conservation Letters, 2017, 10(1): 58-66.
[11] 张淑娴,陈美球,谢贤鑫,等.生态认知、信息传递与农户生态耕种采纳行为[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(8):89-96.
[12] 张童朝,颜廷武,王镇.社会网络、收入不确定与自雇佣妇女的保护性耕作技术采纳行为[J].农业技术经济,2020(8):101-116.
[13] 吴璟,王天宇,王征兵.社会网络和感知价值对农户耕地质量保护行为选择的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2021(6):138-147.
[14] 赵旭强,穆月英,陈阜.保护性耕作技术经济效益及其补贴政策的总体评价——来自山西省农户问卷调查的分析[J].经济问题,2012(2):74-77.
[15] 李兆亮,罗小锋,丘雯文.经营规模、地权稳定与农户有机肥施用行为——基于调节效应和中介效应模型的研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019(8):1918-1928.
[16] 余威震,罗小锋,李容容.孰轻孰重:市场经济下能力培育与环境建设?——基于农户绿色技术采纳行为的实证[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(3):71-78.
[17] Camille S M, Keil A, Zeller M, et al. Land Titling Policy and Soil Conservation in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2): 617-627.
[18] 钱龙,冯永辉,卢华.地权稳定性对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——基于新一轮确权颁证调节效应的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(2):104-115.
[19] 杨宗耀,纪月清.地权稳定性与农户土地投资:基于确权政策预期与落地影响差异的讨论[J].中国土地科学,2022,36(6):66-75.
[20] 李福夺,张康洁,刘焦南,等.破解流转地保护困境:经营权稳定性对农户保护性实践的影响研究[J].中国土地科学,2023,37(7):30-41.
[21] 李博,王瑞梅,卢泉.经营权不稳定是否阻碍了农户耕地质量保护投资[J].农业技术经济,2021(12):105-116.
[22] 杨志海,王雅鹏,麦尔旦·吐尔孙.农户耕地质量保护性投入行为及其影响因素分析——基于兼业分化视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015(12):105-112.
[23] 许庆,章元.土地调整、地权稳定性与农民长期投资激励[J].经济研究,2005(10):59-69.
[24] Juan P, Gerardo B. Local Perception of Land Degradation in Developing Countries: A Simplified Analytical Framework of Driving Forces, Processes, Indicators and Coping Strategies [J].Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 2014, 8(4): 1-21.
[25] Ma M. Interdependent Investments in Attached and Movable Assets under Insecure Land Rights [J].China Economic Review, 2023, 77:101909.
[26] 郭珍.制度变迁、认知偏差与农户耕地利用行为[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2020,36(6):92-98.
[27] McConnell K E. An Economic Model of Soil Conservation [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1983, 65: 83-88.

相似文献/References:

[1]方涧.耕地保护视阙下轮作休耕的法律表达[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(03):111.
　FANG Jian.The Legal Expression of Crop Rotation and Land Fallow on the Perspective of Cultivated Land Protection[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(04):111.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-01-03。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“多元利益视角下农地细碎化协同治理机制研究”(23BGL264);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“安徽打造长三角绿色农产品生产加工供应基地的优化机制研究”(AHSKY2022D128);安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划一般项目(gxyq2022031)
作者简介:王全忠,男,安庆师范大学经济与管理学院副教授;周宏(通信作者),男,南京农业大学经济管理学院教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01