[1]卢祥波.乡村振兴中的个体化困境与村庄团结重建——基于多案例的比较分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(01):80-91.
　LU Xiangbo.Individualization Dilemma and Village Solidarity Reconstruction in Rural Revitalization: A Comparative Analysis Based on Multiple Cases[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(01):80-91.
点击复制

乡村振兴中的个体化困境与村庄团结重建——基于多案例的比较分析()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
25
期数:
2025年01期
页码:
80-91
栏目:
乡村振兴的理论与实践
出版日期:
2025-01-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Individualization Dilemma and Village Solidarity Reconstruction in Rural Revitalization: A Comparative Analysis Based on Multiple Cases
作者:
卢祥波
浙江师范大学 法学院, 金华 321004
Author(s):
LU Xiangbo
关键词:
乡村振兴; 个体化; 村庄团结; 村民参与; 社会基础
Keywords:
Rural Revitalization; Individualization; Village Solidarity; Villager Participation; Social Foundation
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
村民是乡村振兴的主体,然而当前村民个体化的趋势明显,村民参与不足和村庄团结程度不高是较为普遍的现象。在此背景下,如何促进村庄团结以实现乡村振兴就成为一个重要的研究议题。基于四川省某乡镇三个相邻村庄发展实践的多案例比较,考察了村庄团结的形成机制。研究发现,尽管面临相同的国家政策与市场环境,但村庄团结的差异导致了三村发展效果的不同。村庄团结的形成需具备两个条件:其一,作为村庄团结的组织主体,集体要有将村民组织起来的能力,而这与村领导为民服务的意愿、经营村庄的能力、领导班子的凝聚力和稳定性相关。其二,在此基础上,村庄团结的形成还取决于村民参与的意愿,而这受利益、制度和集体意识等因素的影响。在市场经济的背景下,利益联结是促成村民参与发展的首要因素。而基于利益关系的村庄团结具有不稳定性,这就需要村内具备能落实的制度安排来保障村庄团结的维系。此外,集体意识的凝聚让村民主动参与村庄发展。总之,当集体具备组织村民的能力,并与村民基于利益联结、制度规范以及集体认同等纽带而有效联结时,村庄团结便有了形成的可能,乡村振兴也具备了可依托的社会基础。
Abstract:
Villagers are the central agents of rural revitalization. Nevertheless, the trend towards individualization among villagers is pronounced, and the issues of limited villager participation and low levels of village solidarity are prevalent. In this setting, the question of how to build village solidarity for the achievement of rural revitalization emerges as a significant research focus. This paper investigates the mechanism behind the formation of village solidarity by comparing the development experiences of three neighboring villages in Sichuan Province. The study reveals that even when faced with identical national policies and market conditions, variations in village solidarity result in differing development outcomes among the three villages. The creation of village solidarity hinges on two key conditions. Firstly, the collective, as the organizing entity of village solidarity, must possess the capability to mobilize the villagers, which is linked to the village leaders’ commitment to public service, their competence in managing village affairs, and the cohesiveness and stability of the leadership team. Furthermore, the establishment of village solidarity also relies on the villagers’ willingness to participate, which is influenced by factors such as interests, systems, and collective consciousness. In the context of a market economy, the alignment of interests is the primary driver of villagers’ participation in development. However, solidarity based solely on interest relations can be fragile, necessitating the village to have an enforceable institutional framework that ensures the preservation of village solidarity. Additionally, the unity fostered by collective consciousness motivates villagers to actively engage in village development. In summary, when the collective can effectively organize the villagers and engage with them through the bonds of interest, institutional norms, and collective identity, the potential for village solidarity to form is realized, providing a social foundation for rural revitalization to build upon.

参考文献/References:

[1] 阎云翔.中国社会的个体化[M].陆洋,等译.上海: 上海译文出版社, 2016: 23.
[2] 吴重庆, 张慧鹏. 以农民组织化重建乡村主体性: 新时代乡村振兴的基础[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,35(3): 74-81.
[3] 孙枭雄, 仝志辉. 村社共同体的式微与重塑——以浙江象山"村民说事" 为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2020(1): 17-28.
[4] 王春光. 迈向多元自主的乡村治理——社会结构转变带来的村治新问题及其化解[J]. 人民论坛, 2015(14): 11-13.
[5] 王春光, 刘雨龙. 中国现代化进程中基层社会联系的嬗变、断裂与建构——对沿海某发达县级市的社会学观察与分析[J]. 河北学刊, 2016,36(1): 150-158.
[6] 王露璐. 中国式现代化进程中的乡村振兴与伦理重建[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(12): 89-109.
[7] 王晓毅, 阿妮尔. 全球视野下的中国特色乡村振兴: 制度优势与行动路径[J]. 社会学研究, 2022,37(5): 1-18.
[8] 徐宗阳. 内外有别: 资本下乡的社会基础[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2022: 204.
[9] 苏毅清, 邱亚彪, 方平. "外部激活+内部重塑" 下的公共事物供给:关于激活乡村内生动力的机制解释[J]. 中国农村观察, 2023(2): 72-89.
[10] 王道勇.社会团结中的集体意识: 知识谱系与当代价值[J]. 社会科学, 2022(2): 3-10.
[11] 周怡. 中国第一村——华西村转型经济中的后集体主义[M]. 香港: 牛津大学出版社, 2006:175.
[12] 王颖. 新集体主义——乡村社会的再组织[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 1996: 197-198.
[13] 陈荣卓, 车一頔. 利益聚合与行动协同: 新时代乡村治理共同体何以建构? ——来自武汉市星光村的经验观察[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(10): 65-73.
[14] 曼瑟·奥尔森. 集体行动的逻辑——公共物品与集团理论[M]. 李增刚,译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2018:48.
[15] 颜玉凡, 叶南客. 认同与参与——城市居民的社区公共文化生活逻辑研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2019,34(2): 147-170.
[16] 曹正汉. 伶仃洋畔的村庄公社——崖口村的公社制度及其变迁[M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2004:14.
[17] 冯仕政. 再分配体制的再生——杰村的制度变迁[M]. 北京: 国家行政学院出版社, 2002:274.
[18] 王春光. 扶贫开发与村庄团结关系之研究[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2014(3): 69-78.
[19] 肖瑛. 在共同体取向与个人主义之间: "公共性" 源流考[J]. 河北学刊, 2016, 36(6): 150-156.
[20] 李友梅. 中国社会治理的新内涵与新作为[J]. 社会学研究, 2017,32(6): 27-34.
[21] 李友梅, 肖瑛, 黄晓春. 当代中国社会建设的公共性困境及其超越[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(4): 125-139.
[22] 翟军亮, 吴春梅, 黄宏. 农民组织化与农村公共性的交互性建构: 理论框架、当代实践与未来路径——兼论推进农业农村现代化的路径选择[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,19(6): 61-70.
[23] 冯仕政. 社会治理与公共生活: 从连结到团结[J]. 社会学研究, 2021,36(1): 1-22.
[24] 程士强. 制度移植何以失败? ——以陆村小额信贷组织移植"格莱珉" 模式为例[J]. 社会学研究, 2018,33(4): 84-108.
[25] 陈家建. 多样的现代化——一个苏南村庄的"集体主义"史(1950—2017)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019:21.
[26] 张静. 互不信任的群体何能产生合作 对XW案例的事件史分析[J]. 社会, 2020, 40(5): 91-111.
[27] 费孝通. 志在富民——从沿海到边区的考察[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2007: 341-342.

相似文献/References:

[1]王小璐,王义燕.新生代女性农民工的未婚先孕：婚姻过渡的个体化困境及秩序重建[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(05):41.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(01):41.
[2]王景新,支晓娟.中国乡村振兴及其地域空间重构——特色小镇与美丽乡村同建振兴乡村的案例、经验及未来[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):17.
　WANG Jingxin,ZHI Xiaojuan.Rural Revitalization in China and its Regional Spatial Reconstruction: Case Study and Prospects of “Building up Characteristic Towns with Beautiful Countryside” to Revitalize Chinese Countryside[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):17.
[3]陈美球,廖彩荣,刘桃菊.乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):27.
　CHEN Meiqiu,LIAO Cairong,LIU Taoju.Rural Revitalization, Collective Economic Organization and Land Use System Innovation: Based on Analysis of Huangxi Village, Jiangxi Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):27.
[4]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):19.
　HE Xuefeng.Some Issues in Rural Thriving Strategy Implementation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):19.
[5]刘祖云,王丹.“乡村振兴”战略落地的技术支持[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):8.
　LIU Zuyun,WANG Dan.The Technical Support for Implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):8.
[6]张艺颉.乡村振兴背景下村民自治制度建设与转型路径研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(04):47.
　ZHANG Yijie.Villager Self-governance System Construction and Transformation Path under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):47.
[7]王肖芳.农民工返乡创业集群驱动乡村振兴:机理与策略[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):101.
　WANG Xiaofang.A Study of Migrant Workers Returning Home to Start Businesses Cluster Drive Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):101.
[8]张勇.农村宅基地制度改革的内在逻辑、现实困境与路径选择——基于农民市民化与乡村振兴协同视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):118.
　ZHANG Yong.The Internal Logic, Realistic Predicament and Path Choice of the Rural Homestead System Reform: Based on the Coordination Perspective of Peasant’s Citizenship and Rural Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(01):118.
[9]叶敬忠,张明皓.“小农户”与“小农”之辩——基于“小农户”的生产力振兴和“小农”的生产关系振兴[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):1.
　YE Jingzhong,ZHANG Minghao.Differences Between Smallholders and Peasants: Smallholders Based Vitalization of Productive Forces and Peasants Based Vitalization of Productive Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):1.
[10]吴重庆,张慧鹏.小农与乡村振兴——现代农业产业分工体系中小农户的结构性困境与出路[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(01):13.
　WU Chongqing,ZHANG Huipeng.Small Farmers and Rural Revitalization: Structural Dilemma and Outlet of Small Farmers in Modern Agricultural Industry Division System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(01):13.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-3-6。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代乡村治理的组织体系建设问题研究”(20&ZD166);浙江省社会科学界联合会研究课题“乡村振兴中农民的主体性缺失与组织化机制研究”(2025N030);四川省社会科学重点研究基地——农业现代化与乡村振兴研究中心2024年度开放课题“乡村振兴中的组织困境与优化路径研究”(AMRR2024008)
作者简介:卢祥波,男,浙江师范大学法学院讲师,博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01