[1]陈雪婧,方淑敏.迈向超地方行动:乡村产业的行动者网络建构及其协商机制——基于云南寻甸Z社区“小山茶”项目的田野考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(01):128-141.
　CHEN Xuejing,FANG Shumin.Toward Super-local Action: The Construction of Actor-network in Rural Industries and Its Negotiation Mechanism: Based on the Field Study of the “Xiao Shan Tea” Project in Z Community, Xundian,Yunnan Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(01):128-141.
点击复制

迈向超地方行动:乡村产业的行动者网络建构及其协商机制——基于云南寻甸Z社区“小山茶”项目的田野考察()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
25
期数:
2025年01期
页码:
128-141
栏目:
乡村社会发展
出版日期:
2025-01-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Toward Super-local Action: The Construction of Actor-network in Rural Industries and Its Negotiation Mechanism: Based on the Field Study of the “Xiao Shan Tea” Project in Z Community, Xundian,Yunnan Province
作者:
陈雪婧1;  方淑敏2
1. 西北农林科技大学 人文社会发展学院, 杨凌 712100;
2. 华东师范大学 社会发展学院, 上海 200241
Author(s):
CHEN Xuejing1;  FANG Shumin2
关键词:
乡村产业; 行动者网络; 协商实践; 超地方行动
Keywords:
Rural Industry; Actor Network; Negotiation Practice; Hyper-local Action
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
随着城乡融合发展进程的推进以及现代性所赋予的社区流动性特征,乡村产业发展格局不断由地方性向超地方性转变。以云南省Z社区“小山茶”项目为例,运用行动者网络理论,构建“行动者—转译—网络”的分析框架,探究乡村产业发展中是如何通过建构行动者网络来开展协商实践的。首先解析乡村产业超地方行动者的关系结构,当地居民、上级政府、市场主体、外部高校等构成重要行动者。其次探索多元主体的转译协商过程,发现超地方行动者网络联结经历产业发展的问题聚焦、多元利益的协调整合、发展主体的征召联结、协商行动的动员参与四个阶段。最后探讨乡村产业中行动者网络的整合机制,由需求导向的内生驱动机制、协商取向的制度保障机制、资源共享的网络联结机制共同构成网络的运作逻辑,形成内外共生的乡村产业超地方行动者网络形态。
Abstract:
With the progression of urban-rural integration and the community mobility characteristic of modernity, the development model of rural industry is evolving from the local to the hyper-local. This paper, based on a field investigation of the "Xiaoshan Tea" project in the Z Community of Xundian, Yunnan Province, employs the actor-network theory and the "actor-translation-network" analytical framework. It first examines the relational structure of rural industry’s hyper-local actors, including local residents, higher-level government, market players, external universities, and other key stakeholders. Secondly, it delves into the process of multi-subject translation negotiation, identifying four stages in the networking of hyper-local actors: focusing on industrial development issues, coordinating and integrating diverse interests, enlisting and connecting development agents, and mobilizing and engaging in negotiation actions. Finally, the paper discusses the integration mechanisms of the actor network in rural industry, including a demand-oriented endogenous drive mechanism, a consultative institutional guarantee mechanism, and a resource-sharing network connection mechanism. These elements collectively form the operational logic of the network, culminating in the creation of a rural industry’s hyper-local actor network that fosters internal and external symbiosis.

参考文献/References:

[1] Skocpol T, Ganz M, Munson Z. A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States[J]. American Political Science Review, 2000, 94(3): 527-546.
[2] 曾薇. 在地化调适: 党建引领乡村产业发展的实践创新[J]. 中国农村观察, 2023(6):103-123.
[3] 许汉泽. 乡村产业振兴中的 "联村发展"——对陕南H县 "三联"经验的考察[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 41(1): 106-120.
[4] 贺林波, 李甜. 乡村产业振兴中的政企合作及其社会基础——以湖南省B县黄金茶产业开发为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 40(6):99-115.
[5] 李培林. 乡村振兴与中国式现代化: 内生动力和路径选择[J]. 社会学研究, 2023, 38(6): 1-17.
[6] 王春光. 乡村建设与多元共享利益共同体的建构[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2022(15): 48-54.
[7] Bosworth G, Annibal I, Carroll T, et al. Empowering Local Action through Neo-endogenous Development:The Case of LEADER in England[J].Sociologia Ruralis, 2016,56(3):427-449.
[8] Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W. Cultivating Comunities of Practice:A Guide to Managing Knowledge[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
[9] Adamski T, Gorlach K. Neo-endogenous Development and the Revalidation of Local Knowledge[J]. Polish Sociological Review, 2007,4(160): 481-497.
[10] Callon M. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay[J]. The Sociological Review, 1984, 32(1): 196-233.
[11] 布鲁诺·拉图尔. 我们从未现代过: 对称性人类学论集[M]. 刘鹏,安涅思,译.上海: 上海文艺出版社, 2022: 106-120.
[12] Latour B. Reassembling the Social:An Introduction to Actor-network-theory[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005: 37.
[13] Latour B.The Pasteurization of France[M].Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,1988:168.
[14] 赵万里.科学的社会建构: 科学知识社会学的理论与实践[M].天津:天津人民出版社, 2002: 287.
[15] Borch C.Machine Learning and Postcolonial Critique: Homologous Challenges to Sociological Notions of Human Agency[J]. Sociology, 2023, 57(6): 1450-1466.
[16] 文军, 陈雪婧. 社区协同治理中的转译实践: 模式、困境及其超越——基于行动者网络理论的分析[J]. 社会科学, 2023(1): 141-152.
[17] Collon M. Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is not: The Sociology of Translation[J]. The Social Process of Scientific Investigation: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 1980(4): 197-201.
[18] 李卓, 郑永君. 有为政府与有效市场: 产业振兴中政府与市场的角色定位——基于A县产业扶贫实践的考察[J]. 云南社会科学, 2022(1): 162-168.
[19] 王越, 刘余. "社区嵌入"与农民专业合作社的发展[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023, 22(2): 51-61.
[20] 田毅鹏, 钟祥纬. 乡村振兴背景下 "带动小农户" 议题的社会政策意蕴[J]. 社会科学战线, 2024(4): 221-233.
[21] 张樹沁, 邱泽奇. 乡村电商何以成功?——技术红利兑现机制的社会学分析[J]. 社会学研究, 2022, 37(2): 114-136.
[22] 刘津. 村民参与村治的行动逻辑及关系结构困境[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(5): 59-70.
[23] 李路路. 社会结构阶层化和利益关系市场化——中国社会管理面临的新挑战[J]. 社会学研究, 2012, 27(2): 1-19.
[24] 卢宪英. 紧密利益共同体自治:基层社区治理的另一种思路——来自H省移民新村社会治理机制创新效果的启示[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(6): 62-72.
[25] Callon M.Four Models for the Dynamics of Science[M]//Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America : SAGE Publications, Inc.,1995:28-63.
[26] 文军,陈雪婧.国家介入与地方行动:乡村内生发展的张力及其化解[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(1): 1-13.
[27] Latour B.Postmodern? No,Simply Amodern! Steps toward an Anthropology of Science[M].London:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,1990:145-171.
[28] 蔡禾, 黄晓星. 城市社区二重性及其治理[J]. 山东社会科学, 2020(4): 89-100.
[29] 马迎贤. 组织间关系: 资源依赖理论的历史演进[J]. 社会, 2004(7): 33-38.
[30] Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society[M].Cambridge,MA:Blackwell Publishers, 1996:1-594.
[31] Harman G.The Importance of Bruno Latour for Philosophy[J].Cultural Studies Review, 2007(1):31-49.

相似文献/References:

[1]贺林波,乔逸平.乡村振兴背景下乡村产业的风险转化及防范——以X市特色茶产业开发为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(01):99.
　HE Linbo,QIAO Yiping.Risk Conversion Mechanism of Rural Industry Revitalization in the Context of Rural Revitalization: Taking the Development of Characteristic Tea Industry in X City as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(01):99.
[2]许汉泽.产业进园:欠发达地区乡村产业振兴的新趋向——对H县“镇园产业联盟”模式的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(06):152.
　XU Hanze.Industry into the Park under the New Trend of Rural Industry Revitalization in Underdeveloped Areas: An Investigation on the Model of “Town-park Industrial Alliance” in H County[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(01):152.
[3]高鸣,周子铭.“千万工程”经验赋能乡村产业发展的理论逻辑、现实基础与行动路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(02):1.
　GAO Ming,ZHOU Ziming.Theoretical Logic, Practical Basis and Action Path of the "Green Rural Revival Program" Experience in Empowering Rural Industrial Development[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(01):1.
[4]潘珣.数字技术赋能乡村产业人才队伍建设的理论机制、现实挑战与路径优化[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(01):104.
　PAN Xun.Theoretical Mechanisms, Practical Challenges, and Path Optimization of Digital Technology Empowering the Construction of Rural Industry Talent Team[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(01):104.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-5-15。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“新形势下我国社会发展面临的不确定性及其应对机制研究”(22&ZD183);国家社会科学基金重点项目“不确定性研究的社会学转向及其体系建构”(22ASH002);西北农林科技大学人文社会发展学院第四届“凤岗培优”研究生科研支持项目“新内生发展视角下乡村行动者网络建构路径研究”
作者简介:陈雪婧,女,西北农林科技大学人文社会发展学院博士生;方淑敏,女,华东师范大学社会发展学院博士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01