[1]马流辉.农地福利化:实践机制、后果呈现及其优化路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(06):66-73.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(06):66-73.
点击复制

农地福利化:实践机制、后果呈现及其优化路径()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2013年06期
页码:
66-73
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2013-12-31

文章信息/Info

作者:
马流辉
华东理工大学社会学系
关键词:
农地福利化农地流转农地制度改革
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在沪郊的农村,制度化社会保障体系的建立和稳定性非农就业的实现,使农地原初具有的生活保障和就业承载功能逐步剥离,呈现出“去保障化”的趋势。但在现有的农地制度安排下,农户的承包权已经物权化,各级政府的惠农补贴和畸形农地流转市场形成的虚高地租,强化了农地的收益效应。在这一情势下,“去保障化”的农地转而成为满足农民“多多益善”心理的福利,农地福利化倾向凸显。本文以沪郊埭村为个案,对农地福利化的实践机制进行分析,并呈现这一发展趋势的社会经济后果,最后提出破解农地福利化困境的优化路径,以期为下一步的农地制度改革提供参考。

相似文献/References:

[1]夏柱智.虚拟确权:农地流转制度创新[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(06):89.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(06):89.
[2]朱建军,胡继连.农地流转对我国农民收入分配的影响研究——基于中国健康与养老追踪调查数据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(03):75.
 [J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(06):75.
[3]付江涛,纪月清,胡浩.新一轮承包地确权登记颁证是否促进了农户的土地流转--来自江苏省3县(市、区)的经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(01):105.
 FU Jiangtao,JI Yueqing,HU Hao.Does New-Round Land Confirmation, Registration and Certification Boost the Land Transfer among Farmers? An Empirical Evidence from 3 Counties in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):105.
[4]侯建昀,霍学喜.专业化农户农地流转行为的实证分析——基于苹果种植户的微观证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(02):93.
 HOU Jianyun,HUO Xuexi.Empirical Analysis of Land Lease Market Economic Effect: The Micro Evidence from Apple Growers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):93.
[5]王敏,诸培新,张建.农地流转对农户宅基地退出意愿影响研究——基于江苏省855户农户的调查结果分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(4):81.
 WANG Min,ZHU Peixin,ZHANG Jian.How Farmland Circulation Affects Farmers’ Willingness to Homestead Exit: Based on a Survey of 855 Farmer Households in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):81.
[6]杨玉珍.我国农地制度“被建构”与“被执行”的冲突——以土地承包经营权流转为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(06):77.
 YANG Yuzhen.China??s Rural Land Property System Conflicts Between Being Constructed and Being Executed: Taking Land Contractual Management Right Transfer as Case[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):77.
[7]黄惠春,徐章星,祁艳.农地流转与规模化经营缓解了农户信贷约束吗?——来自江苏的经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(06):109.
 Huang Huichun,Xu Zhangxing,Qi Yan.Did Rural Land Circulation and Scale-land Management Decrease Credit Constraint on Rural Households? Evidences from Case of Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):109.
[8]张建,王敏,诸培新.农地流转政策执行偏差与农民土地权益保护——以江苏省某传统农业大县S县为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(02):82.
 ZHANG Jian,WANG Min,ZHU Peixin.Deviation of Policy Implementation in Farmland Transfer and Farmers’ Land Rights and Interests Protection: Taking a Traditional Agricultural County in Jiangsu Province as a Case[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(06):82.
[9]诸培新,苏敏,颜杰.转入农地经营规模及稳定性对农户化肥投入的影响——以江苏四县(市)水稻生产为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):85.
 ZHU Peixin,SU Min,YAN Jie.Impact of Farmland Scale and Stability on Fertilizer Input: Taking Rice Production of Four Counties of Jiangsu Province as Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(06):85.
[10]吕晓,臧涛,张全景.土地政策的农户认知及其农地转出响应研究——基于山东省287份农户问卷调查的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(05):100.
 LV Xiao,ZANG Tao,ZHANG Quanjing.Farm Households’Cognition of Land Policy and Its Effect on Farmland Transfer:Based on the Investigation of 287 Farmer Households in Shandong Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(06):100.

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-12-31