[1]谢小芹.“双轨治理”:“第一书记”扶贫制度的一种分析框架——基于广西圆村的田野调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(03):53-62.
 XIE Xiaoqin.‘Two-Track Governance’, an Interpretation Framework of the‘First Secretary’ Pro-Poor Institutional:A fieldwork based on Guangxi Yuan village[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):53-62.
点击复制

“双轨治理”:“第一书记”扶贫制度的一种分析框架——基于广西圆村的田野调查()
分享到:

南京农业大学学报(社科版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
53-62
栏目:
村庄治理
出版日期:
2017-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
‘Two-Track Governance’, an Interpretation Framework of the‘First Secretary’ Pro-Poor Institutional:A fieldwork based on Guangxi Yuan village
作者:
谢小芹
西南财经大学公共管理学院, 四川 成都 611130
Author(s):
XIE Xiaoqin
关键词:
第一书记精准扶贫“双轨治理”
分类号:
C912.82
摘要:
将贫困置于中国自身的政治与治理语境中进行考察,这将有利于拓展贫困的本土研究。基于费孝通的“双轨政治”,文章提出“双轨治理”概念,认为其既包含国家治理又包括基层治理,特指国家在“攻坚拔寨”特殊时期设置的第一书记制度与在改革开放后一直延续至今的村支书制度在扶贫领域相互作用而形成的一种有效的治贫格局。然而“双轨治理”也潜藏着造假共谋和形式主义、权力博弈与不合作、农民边缘化与基层自治力量削弱,及村庄公共性瓦解等新问题。完善“双轨治理”,可从政府与社会有限度的自主性、互惠性的资源依赖、合作型的治理及村落共同体的重建四方面入手,最终实现精准扶贫的目标。
Abstract:
Poverty is placed in the context of China’s own political and governance context, which will facilitate the expansion of indigenous research on poverty. Based on Fei Xiaotong’s ‘two-track politics’, the paper puts forward the concept of ‘dual-track governance’ including national governance and grass-roots governance,which referes to a pattern of the new political system that is interacted between the first secretary set in the special period and the party secretary in the reform and opening up, and also poverty dilemma. ‘dual-track governance’ has four dilemmas which includes limits of national politics, the plight of grassroots political, the marginalized farmers and the collapse of the village public is presented.Therefore, from the four aspects about the government and society limited autonomy and mutual dependence of resources, governance and reconstruction cooperative village community, the paper ensure interaction between state and society, so as to achieve ending the poverty.

参考文献/References:

[1] 林雪霏.扶贫场域内科层组织的制度弹性——基于广西L县扶贫实践的研究[J].公共管理学报,2014(1):27-38,138-139.
[2] 阿马蒂亚 森.以自由看待发展[M].任于真,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002:10.
[3] 周怡.社会情境理论:贫困现象的另一种解释[J].社会科学,2007(10):56-62.
[4] 李小云.我国农村扶贫战略实施的治理问题[J].贵州社会科学,2013(7):101-106.
[5] 邢成举,李小云.精英俘获与财政扶贫项目目标偏离的研究[J].中国行政管理,2013:109-113.
[6] 汤建国.“第一书记”要当好“三员”[N].孝感日报,2015-05-23(4).
[7] 霍庆涛.精准选派村“第一书记”[J].当代贵州,2015(20):21.
[8] 吴琼.“第一书记”要当好“村里人”[J].党员生活,2015(9):26.
[9] 陈晖.“第一书记”第一担当[J].四川党的建设(农村版),2015(6):20-21.
[10] Pierre Bourdieu. Social Space and Symbolic Power[J]. Sociological Theory, 1989(1):14-25.
[11] 叶敬忠.行动者为导向的发展社会学研究方法——解读《行动者视角的发展社会学》[J].贵州社会科学,2009(10):72-79.

相似文献/References:

[1]付少平,赵晓峰.精准扶贫视角下的移民生计空间再塑造研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(06):8.
 FU Shaoping,ZHAO Xiaofeng.On the Recreation of Living Space of Targeted Poverty Reduction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(03):8.
[2]万君,张琦.“内外融合”:精准扶贫机制的发展转型与完善路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):9.
 WAN Jun,ZHANG Qi.Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Development: Transformation and Improvement Path of China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation Mechanism[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):9.
[3]高飞,向德平.社会治理视角下精准扶贫的政策启示[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):21.
 GAO Fei,XIANG Deping.Policy Implication of Precision Poverty Relief from Social Administration Angle[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):21.
[4]谢治菊.块数据在农村精准扶贫中的应用及反思——兼与“条时代”大数据应用相比较[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(05):32.
 XIE Zhiju.Block Data in Rural Precision Poverty Relief:Application and Reflection[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):32.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-10-9。
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究项目“精准扶贫视域下西南民族旅游地区贫困再生产及治理机制研究”(16YJC840026)
作者简介:谢小芹,女,西南财经大学公共管理学院讲师,博士。E-mail:xiexiaoqin2005@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-04-25