[1]单平基.分解、舍弃抑或改造:《民法典》编纂中土地承包经营权的定位[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(03):123-131.
　SHAN Pingji.Decompose, Abandon or Transform: The Orientation of Land Contractual Management Right in Civil Code[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):123-131.
点击复制

分解、舍弃抑或改造:《民法典》编纂中土地承包经营权的定位()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
123-131
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2020-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Decompose, Abandon or Transform: The Orientation of Land Contractual Management Right in Civil Code
作者:
单平基
东南大学 法学院, 江苏 南京 210096
Author(s):
SHAN Pingji
关键词:
《民法典》; “三权”分置; 土地承包经营权; 土地承包权; 土地经营权
Keywords:
Civil Code; Separation of Three Rights to Rural Land; Land Contractual Management Right; Contractual Right of Land; Managerial Right of Land
分类号:
D922.32
摘要:
《民法典》编纂中，农地"三权"分置既不应分解、架空或舍弃土地承包经营权，也不宜将其准所有权化或认定为自物权，而应坚持土地承包经营权而非"土地承包权"的称谓并充实其权能，使其回归本来的用益物权属性。《民法典（草案）》《民法典》物权编（草案）二审稿、一审稿和《农村土地承包法》关于土地承包经营权的制度设计存在一定缺陷。《民法典》中的农地"三权"分置应采用"农地集体所有权（自物权）、土地承包经营权（用益物权）、土地经营权（债权）"，而非"农地集体所有权（自物权）、土地承包权（用益物权）、土地经营权（用益物权）"之结构。在农地法制改革中，应坚持和落实农地集体所有权，而不能将其虚置；不能将土地承包经营权认定为扮演所有权的角色，而应坚持其为派生自农地集体所有权的用益物权定位，并以充实其用益物权权能为基点进行农村土地制度改造；土地经营权应定位为分离自土地承包经营权的债权性权利。其中，土地承包经营权这一权利定性和权利称谓，不应受土地经营权生成和定性的影响，也不应被"土地承包权"所替代。在充实土地承包经营权之用益物权权能前提下，经由债权定性的土地经营权的生成和流转，助推农业适度规模经营和乡村振兴的实现。
Abstract:
The land contractual management right should not be decomposed, suspended or abandoned, nor should it bequasi-owned or identified as jus in re propria, but the title of land contractual management right (rather than “contractual right of land”) should be persisted and its power should be enriched to return to the original usufructuary right in Civil Code. There are some defects on the land contractual management right in Civil Code (Draft) and the Rural Land Contract Law. The structure of collective ownership of land (jus in re propria) - land contractual management right(usufructuary right) - managerial right of land (creditor’s rights) shall be adopted for the separation of three rights to rural land. In the legal reform of farmland, we should insist on the collective ownership of rural land and can’t use it as a decoration. Land contractual management right shall not be “quasi-proprietary” or defined as “property right”. We should stick to its orientation of usufructuary right derived from the collective ownership of rural land and reform the rural land system based on enriching its usufructuary right. Managerial right of land should be defined as creditor’s right separated from land contractual management right. Among them, the qualitative and right title of land contractual management right is not influenced by the generation and qualitative of managerial right of land, nor should it be replaced by contractual right of land. On the basis of enriching the power of the usufructuary right of the land contractual management right, the managerial right of land should be characterized as the creditor’s right and allowed to circulate, so as to realize the aim of moderate scale management of modern agriculture and the revitalization of the countryside.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孙宪忠.推进农地三权分置经营模式的立法研究[J].中国社会科学,2016(7):145-163,208-209.
[2] 叶华.农地承包权具有所有权性质[J].中国农村观察,1998(6):16-18.
[3] 蔡立东,姜楠.农地三权分置的法实现[J].中国社会科学,2017(5):102-122,207.
[4] 马俊驹,丁晓强.农村集体土地所有权的分解与保留——论农地"三权分置"的法律构造[J].法律科学,2017,35(3):141-150.
[5] 李国强.论农地流转中"三权分置"的法律关系[J].法律科学,2015,33(6):179-188.
[6] 韩长赋.关于深化农村改革的几个问题[J].农村工作通讯,2014(22):7-12.
[7] 单平基.民法典编纂中恶意占有有益费用求偿权的证立及界分[J].当代法学,2016,30(3):89-99.
[8] 卡尔拉伦茨.德国民法通论[M].王晓晔,邵建东,程建英,等,译.北京:法律出版社,2003:285.
[9] 祝之舟.《农村土地承包法》修改的制度要点与实施问题研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(4):87-94,158-159.
[10] 耿卓.农地三权分置改革中土地经营权的法理反思与制度回应[J].法学家,2017(5):13-24,175.
[11] 朱广新.土地承包权与经营权分离的政策意蕴与法制完善[J].法学,2015(11):88-100.
[12] 高飞.农村土地"三权分置"的法理阐释与制度意蕴[J].法学研究,2016,38(3):3-19.
[13] 谢在全.民法物权论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2011:426.
[14] 崔建远.物权法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2017:272.
[15] 山本敬三.民法讲义I总则[M].解亘,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2004:12.
[16] 单平基."三权分置"理论反思与土地承包经营权困境的解决路径[J].法学,2016(9):54-66.
[17] 杜涛.中华人民共和国农村土地承包法解读[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2019:60-61.
[18] 高圣平.农地三权分置改革与民法典物权编编纂——兼评《民法典各分编(草案)》物权编[J].华东政法大学学报,2019(2):14-24.
[19] 刘守英,高圣平,王瑞民.农地三权分置下的土地权利体系重构[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,54(5):134-145.
[20] 陈锡文,赵阳,陈剑波,等.中国农村制度变迁60年[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:9.
[21] 陈小君.我国农村土地法律制度变革的思路与框架——十八届三中全会《决定》相关内容解读[J].法学研究,2014,36(4):3-25.
[22] 丁文.论土地承包权与土地承包经营权的分离[J].中国法学,2015(3):159-178.
[23] 党的十九大报告辅导读本编写组.党的十九大报告辅导读本[M].北京:人民出版社,2017:212.
[24] 俞江.保护既有权益是民法典编纂的底线[J].法学,2015(7):67-77.
[25] 赵万一,汪青松.土地承包经营权的功能转型及权能实现——基于农村社会管理创新的视角[J].法学研究,2014,36(1):74-92.
[26] 崔建远.土地承包经营权的修改意见[J].浙江社会科学,2005(6):65-68.
[27] 胡康生.中华人民共和国合同法释义[M].北京:法律出版社,2013:350.
[28] 王利明,房绍坤,王轶.合同法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:344-345.
[29] 高圣平.不动产权利的登记能力——评《不动产登记暂行条例(征求意见稿)》第4条[J].政治与法律,2014(12):8-17.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁亚荣,钟文颢.共享农庄土地利用法律问题研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(03):117.
　LIANG Yarong,ZHONG Wenhao.Study on the Legal Issues of Land Use on Shared Farms[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):117.
[2]孙新华,柳泽凡,周佩萱.“三权”分置中的地权整合与土地集中利用——以皖南河镇为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(01):2.
　SUN Xinhua,LIU Zefan,ZHOU Peixuan.Land Rights Integration in the “Three Rights” Separation and Centralized Use of Land: Evidence from River Town in the South of Anhui Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):2.
[3]彭开丽.“三权”分置背景下农户土地流转决策的形成机理与实证检验——基于湖北省672户农户的调研[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):116.
　PENG Kaili.Formation Mechanism and Empirical Study of Farmers’ Land Transfer Decision Under the Background of “Three Rights Separation”Policy: Evidence From Hubei Province with Survey of 672 Farmers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):116.
[4]廖洪乐.农地“两权”分离和“三权”分置的经济学与法学逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(05):109.
　LIAO Hongle.Economical Logics and Jurisprudential Logics on Both Farmland’s Two Rights Division and Farmland’s Three Rights Separation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):109.
[5]赵亚莉,龙开胜.农地“三权”分置下耕地生态补偿的理论逻辑与实现路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(05):119.
　ZHAO Yali,LONG Kaisheng.Theoretical Logic and Realization Paths of Arable Land Ecological Compensation under Tripartite Rural Land Entitlement System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):119.
[6]刘国栋,蔡立东.农村宅基地权利制度的演进逻辑与未来走向[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(06):115.
　LIU Guodong,CAI Lidong.Rural Homestead Right System: Evolution Logics and Future Direction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):115.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-07-25。
基金项目:教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目"农地‘三权分置’权利构造：学说与规范"（18JHQ065）
作者简介:单平基,男,东南大学法学院副教授,东南大学最高人民检察院民事检察研究基地主任
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01