[1]张慧利,夏显力.农村劳动力流动如何影响农户宅基地退出行为？[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(01):139-148.
　ZHANG Huili,XIA Xianli.How Does Rural Labor Mobility Affect Farmers’ Homestead Withdrawal?[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(01):139-148.
点击复制

农村劳动力流动如何影响农户宅基地退出行为？()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
139-148
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2022-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
How Does Rural Labor Mobility Affect Farmers’ Homestead Withdrawal?
作者:
张慧利;  夏显力
西北农林科技大学 经济管理学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
ZHANG Huili;  XIA Xianli
关键词:
农村劳动力流动; 宅基地退出; 遮掩效应; 风险; 社会网络
Keywords:
Rural Labor Mobility; Homestead Withdrawal; Masking Effect; Risk; Social Network
分类号:
F301
摘要:
使用四川泸县和宁夏平罗县803户农户的微观调研数据，实证探究了农村劳动力流动对农户宅基地退出行为的影响及其内在作用机制。结果表明：农村劳动力流动会促进农户退出宅基地，且劳动力流动对农户宅基地退出行为的正向影响随流动距离的增加而增大。进一步研究发现，农村劳动力流动显著增加了农户家庭收入，但农户家庭收入在劳动力流动影响农户宅基地退出行为中承担的中介作用表现为"遮掩效应"。从农村劳动力流动面临的风险寻求解释机制，结果表明，来自市场、制度及社会等层面的风险均对农户宅基地退出行为产生显著抑制作用，且从社会网络异质性角度看，这些风险对低社会网络农户宅基地退出行为的抑制作用更大。因此，建议积极引导达到城市化要求的高收入群体走出"半城市化"，从市场、制度和社会三个维度破解农户宅基地退出障碍，帮助农户进一步拓展社会网络来弥补城乡分割的社会结构漏洞。
Abstract:
In the context of the high vacancy rate of rural homesteads in China, the mechanism of how rural labor mobility affects the withdrawal behavior of rural households’ homesteads needs to be clarified urgently. This paper uses the micro-survey data of 803 rural households in Lu County, Sichuan and Pingluo County, Ningxia, to empirically study the impact of rural labor mobility on farmers’ homestead withdrawal behavior. The results of the study show that, rural labor mobility will promote the withdrawal of rural households’ homesteads, and the positive impact increases with the increase of the mobility distance. Further research finds that rural labor mobility has significantly increased the income of rural households, but the intermediary role of rural household income is shown as a "masking effect". The explanation mechanism’s results show that risks from the market, system, and society have a significant inhibitory effect on the withdrawal behavior of rural households’ homesteads, and are heterogeneous from social networks. And from the perspective of social network heterogeneity, those risks have a greater inhibitory effect on the withdrawal behavior of rural households with low social networks. Therefore, it is recommended to actively guide high-income groups that meet the requirements of urbanization out of "semi-urbanization", break the barriers to the exit of rural households’ homesteads from the three dimensions of market, system, and society, and help rural households to further expand their social networks to fill the gaps in the social structure of urban-rural division.

参考文献/References:

[1] 尹志超, 刘泰星, 张诚. 农村劳动力流动对家庭储蓄率的影响[J].中国工业经济, 2020(1):24-42.
[2] 甄小鹏, 凌晨. 农村劳动力流动对农村收入及收入差距的影响——基于劳动异质性的视角[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2017(3):220-243.
[3] 张婷, 张安录, 邓松林. 期望收益、风险预期及农户宅基地退出行为——基于上海市松江区、金山区农户的实证分析[J]. 资源科学, 2016(8):1503-1514.
[4] 魏后凯, 黄秉信.农村绿皮书:中国农村经济形势分析与预测(2018-2019)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2019:232-235.
[5] 周京奎. 收入不确定性、住宅权属选择与住宅特征需求——以家庭类型差异为视角的理论与实证分析[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2011(4):1459-1498.
[6] Friedman M. A Theory of the Consumption Function[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1957.
[7] 刘守英. 农民的代际革命和城乡关系重塑[R]. 清华大学中国新型城镇化研究院, 2018.
[8] 钱忠好, 牟燕.乡村振兴与农村土地制度改革[J].农业经济问题, 2020(4):28-36.
[9] 徐延辉, 龚紫钰.社会质量与农民工的市民化[J].经济学家, 2019(7):90-100.
[10] Bogue D J. Internal Migration[M]//Hauser P M, Duncan O D. The Study of Population:An Inventmy and Appraisal. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1955:486-509.
[11] 杨玉珍.农户闲置宅基地退出的影响因素及政策衔接——行为经济学视角[J].经济地理, 2015(7):140-147.
[12] 汪为, 吴海涛.家庭生命周期视角下农村劳动力非农转移的影响因素分析——基于湖北省的调查数据[J].中国农村观察, 2017(6):57-70.
[13] Cai F. Economic Reasons for Migration, the Organization of the Labor Force and the Selection of Jobs[J]. Social Sciences in China, 1998(1):77-84.
[14] 邹伟, 王子坤, 徐博, 等.农户分化对农村宅基地退出行为影响研究——基于江苏省1456个农户的调查[J].中国土地科学, 2017(5):31-37.
[15] 吴婧.农村宅基地使用权退出的实践与路径:基于乡村振兴基础阶段的思考[J].江海学刊, 2020(3):84-90.
[16] 杨慧琳, 袁凯华, 陈银蓉, 等.农户分化、代际差异对宅基地退出意愿的影响——基于宅基地价值认知的中介效应分析[J].资源科学, 2020(9):1680-1691.
[17] 梅金平.不确定性、风险与中国农村劳动力区际流动[J].农业经济问题, 2003(6):34-37, 80.
[18] Nevin J A. Interval Reinforcement of Choice Behavior in Discrete Trials[J]. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969(6):875-885.
[19] Bosker M, Brakman S, Garretsen H, et al. Relaxing Hukou:Increased Labor Mobility and China’s Economic Geography[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2012(2-3):252-266.
[20] 余向华, 陈雪娟. 中国劳动力市场的户籍分割效应及其变迁——工资差异与机会差异双重视角下的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012(12):97-110.
[21] 肖严华.劳动力市场、社会保障制度的多重分割与中国的人口流动[J].学术月刊, 2016(11):95-107.
[22] 黄永亮, 崔岩.社会歧视对不同收入群体社会公平感评价的影响[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(6):23-32.
[23] 孙鹏飞, 高原, 赵凯.宅基地退出对农户收入的影响——基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)的反事实估计[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(2):69-78.
[24] Araujo C, De Janvry A, Sadoulet E. Peer Effects in Employment:Results from Mexico’s Poor Rural Communities[R]. University of Caifornia at Berkeley Working Paper, 2004.
[25] 王超恩, 符平.农民工的职业流动及其影响因素——基于职业分层与代际差异视角的考察[J].人口与经济, 2013(5):89-97.
[26] 唐林, 罗小锋, 黄炎忠, 等.劳动力流动抑制了农户参与村域环境治理吗?——基于湖北省的调查数据[J].中国农村经济, 2019(9):88-103.
[27] Karen E D, Jonathan S, Stephen P Z. Do the Rich Save More?[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2004, 112(2):397-444.
[28] 邹杰玲, 董政祎, 王玉斌."同途殊归":劳动力外出务工对农户采用可持续农业技术的影响[J].中国农村经济, 2018(8):83-98.
[29] MacKinnon D P, Krull J L, Lockwood C M. Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect[J]. Prevention Science, 2000(4):173-181.
[30] 邹秀清, 武婷燕, 徐国良, 等.乡村社会资本与农户宅基地退出——基于江西省余江区522户农户样本[J].中国土地科学, 2020(4):26-34.
[31] 王春超, 周先波.社会资本能影响农民工收入吗?——基于有序响应收入模型的估计和检验[J].管理世界, 2013(9):55-68, 101, 187.
[32] Paxton P. Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1999(1):88-127.
[33] 孙鹏飞, 赵凯.社会资本对农户宅基地退出行为的影响——基于安徽省金寨县的调研数据[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5):128-141.

相似文献/References:

[1]王敏,诸培新,张建.农地流转对农户宅基地退出意愿影响研究——基于江苏省855户农户的调查结果分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(4):81.
　WANG Min,ZHU Peixin,ZHANG Jian.How Farmland Circulation Affects Farmers’ Willingness to Homestead Exit: Based on a Survey of 855 Farmer Households in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(01):81.
[2]孙鹏飞,赵凯.社会资本对农户宅基地退出行为的影响——基于安徽省金寨县的调研数据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(05):128.
　SUN Pengfei,ZHAO Kai.Effect of Social Capital on Farmers’ Behavior of Quitting Rural Residential Land: A Case of 606 Farmers’ Samples in Jinzhai County, Anhui Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(01):128.
[3]王静,赵凯.宅基地退出、要素配置与农户农业生产效率[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(03):151.
　WANG Jing,ZHAO Kai.Agricultural Enterprises’ Vertical Integration Contract Mode Selection and Dynamic Evolution:Case Analysis Based on the Pig Breeding Industry[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(01):151.
[4]胡亦扬,张文武.城市规模、政策筛选与农村劳动力流动[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(05):159.
　HU Yiyang,ZHANG Wenwu.City Size, Policy Selection and Rural Labor Inflow[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(01):159.
[5]高原,高晨曦,赵凯.宅基地退出对农户家庭消费的影响——基于家庭人口结构的调节作用[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(04):139.
　GAO Yuan,GAO Chenxi,ZHAO Kai.The Impact of Homestead Exit on Household Consumption: Based on the Moderating Effect of Household Population Composition[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(01):139.
[6]孙鹏飞,尚丽娟,周升强.宅基地退出对农户子女教育获得的影响——基于安徽金寨县和四川邛崃市农户的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(02):160.
　SUN Pengfei,SHANG Lijuan,ZHOU Shengqiang.Does the Behavior of Quitting Rural Residential Land Help Improve the Education Access of Farmers’ Children: Based on the Survey of Farmers in Jinzhai County, Anhui Province and Qionglai City, Sichuan Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(01):160.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-04-02。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目"生产托管促进小农户与现代农业发展衔接的机制、效应与政策优化研究"（21BJY187）
作者简介:张慧利,女,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院博士生;夏显力,男,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01